To All Super Delegates! : This is very disturbing news!
In the landmark civil fraud case against Bill Clinton in Los Angeles, where the former President is charged with defrauding a Hollywood dot com millionaire to help Hillary Clinton obtain more than $1.2 million from him for her 2000 Senate campaign, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Aurelio Munoz ruled on Friday, April 25 that Hillary Clinton would not be required to testify in a sworn deposition as a material witness in the case until AFTER the November election!
While Bill Clinton, Chelsea Clinton, Al Gore, Ed Rendell, Barabara Streisand, Cher, Stan Lee, Brad Pitt, Mike Wallace, Larry King et al may be called to testify and be deposed starting in May, Hillary alone has been protected from explaining her role in her husbands fraud charges.
In an astonishing ruling by the Judge, Hillary Clinton may NOT be deposed about her role in the illegal solicitation and cover up of the largest contribution made to her Senate campaign until after the presidential election. This is the same contribution Hillary denied knowing about or receiving when Lloyd Grove of the Washington Post asked her specifically about it and her relationship with the donor, Peter Paul, in August 2000. Its the same contribution her finance director David Rosen was criminally tried in May, 2005, or hiding from her and her campaign. Its the same contribution the FEC fined her campaign for hiding from the voters in three false FEC reports by her treasurer between 2000-2006. (
www.paulvclinton.com)
Equally surprising as the ruling was the judges request to Hillary defense lawyer David Kendall to say hello to his (Judge Munoz) friend Bill, also a partner in Kendalls law firm
The decision to shield Hillary Clinton from civil discovery for an additional seven months, thereby delaying a long postponed trial,was made by the judge on his own, without any request by Hillary or her lawyer to make the ruling. No discussion was permitted by Pauls lawyer before the decision was made. Judge Munoz unilateral decision effectively saved the floundering campaign and hopes of Hillary Clinton to win her partys Presidential nomination!
Had Senator Clinton be forced to testify under oath, as a material witness and beneficiary of the fraud that her husband is being sued for before the Democratic Convention, her remote chances for being nominated the party candidate would have been unquestionably destroyed.
Hillary has never publicly commented on the case in which she was a defendant from 2003-2006. Nor has Hillary ever commented on the videotaped phone call she made to Peter Paul the day he began spending more than $1 million for her Senate campaign, the false statements she made through Howard Wolfson to the Washington Post denying working with Paul or receiving any contributions from him, the sworn Declaration she made under oath where she refused to deny any of Pauls allegations, the role her White House aide Kelly Craighead played in coordinating Pauls expenditures and befirending Pauls Japanese business partner during a White House visit and many other unanswered questions of illegal conduct.
The illegalities detailed in Pauls civil complaint and FEC complaint caused Hillarys finance director to be criminally indicted and tried in 2005 by the Department of Justice Office of Public Integrity (the same group that prosecuted
Scooter Libby) for hiding the cost of a fundraiser paid for by Paul. Pauls FEC allegations forced Hillarys campaign to admit to the FEC in October, 2005, that it violated FEC reporting requirements by hiding more than $700,000 received from Paul that Hillary personally said she never received.
Hillarys sworn deposition is expected to reveal numerous illegalities directed by Hillary, with Bills help, to win and keep her Senate seat and avoid being accountable to the law. The judges sua sponte decision to delay Hillarys deposition until after the presidential election denies the publics right to know what a presidential candidate and a former president have done to undermine the Rule of Law and the Constitution by corrupting the Department of Justice Office of Public Integrity and its very Chief, Noel Hillman, federal judge A Howard Matz appointed by Bill Clinton (who deceived the jury in the criminal trial of Hillarys finance director by telling the jury that Hillary was not involved in any way) and the FEC itself which aided and abetted Hillary filing a fourth false FEC report in January, 2006 that omitted any reference to the $1.2 million contribution the FBI and DOJ swore Paul made.
The Department of Justice prosecutor in the May, 2005 criminal case stated that $1.2 million was personally contributed by Paul at the request of Bill Clinton as part of an employment deal for Clintons post White House rainmaking services and was confirmed by FBI Special Agent David Smith as explained by Dept of Justice Prosecutor Dan Schwaber (pages 55,57,72) during the criminal trial of Hillarys finance director David Rosen in May 2005.
Hillarys treasurer was later forced to admit filing the false FEC reports to hide more than $700,000 paid by Paul, and fined $35,000 (the only fine imposed on Hillarys campaign) yet Hillary has never answered one question to the media or the courts about these charges!
In fact, Hillarys sworn Declaration in response to Pauls sworn allegations constituted a legal admission to Pauls charges becauseHillary refused to deny any of the allegations!
Strangely, Hillary admitted to the Washington Post in August 2000 knowing that the fundraising event Paul produced and paid for in August, 2000 cost more than $1 million- yet Rosen was indicted on three counts of hiding this fact from Hillarys campaign causing 3 false FEC reports to be filed!
The cover-up of the original felony violations of the federal election law committed by Hillary and Bill Clinton (they solicited and coordinated Pauls $1 million plus contribution as a quid pro quo for Clintons post White House employment) have resulted in a corruption of every branch of the government by the Clintons- all in plain view of the public and with the collusion of the media and the government. Watergate seems insignificant in the breadth of its public corruption in comparison with what has become the mother of all coverups orchestrated by Hillary Clinton.
Just doing my job 
