Fair point, but likewise your opinion will not be a true representation of what animal kingdom needs either as you are just as much against the laundry as those that root for it too much.
You don't seem to understand me at all...all due respect...so this analysis is a bit off target.
I criticize Disney's management decisions much more so than what's going on in the parks day to day.
But I can separate that stance from what works and what doesn't.
The NFL is a success/works...but it's not a well done project...it doesn't really add anything unique/memorable and that is a failure in management and execution or ulterior motives.
But it has drawn people and developed a following...so it works from an operational standpoint. However the ends do not justify the means.
What is the history of AK?
Let's go over it:
"Forced" by Eisner against the wishes of many upper managers and board members for many valid reasons...notably maintenance costs and difficulty selling animals across all demographics...
Built, but shortened and opened prematurely in a silly PR stunt with the lesser competition, so opened as a half park (a late Eisner signature move...he only built one full park)...
So that was apparent in 99-2002 and beyond when internal tracking (this is where not all takes are the same) showed that is suffered from multiple problems - including the theme and lack of enough attractions/interest due to many factors to drive a following...bad park design, lack of IP identity, bad word of mouth...etc.
So it fell behind the completely disheveled (honeslty) mgm as park 4 outta 4...and at the ridiculous high operational cost that is hard to swallow and sustain...
It's not all AK's fault...a huge problem is lack of middle class discretionary funds and no vacation to be had...but that is the main problem.
Immersive theming hasnt driven the growth of park attendance since day one. Perhaps if they could effectively budget the park? They never have done that either.
But the fact remains: disney needs to get more gate - making more of a #1
Park out of AK - to justify the costs. Elephants don't stop eating...you can't close them like epcot pavilions...and that is how it has to fit in the puzzle.
Avatar needs to be a step towards that considering the cost and it will take up an entire decade. This really isnt debatable...
Not the end all...but a solid step at a minimum.
A one and done scenario isn't gonna go well with management.
So perhaps, the quip with Mickey gloves and a wave might be underselling the point...in this case?