Madonna3
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2008
The whole point of the ride is the scenery and the AA. It's the most advanced AA ever made and they want you to experience the bioluminescence. Many say it is re-rideable.
Not my point...
The whole point of the ride is the scenery and the AA. It's the most advanced AA ever made and they want you to experience the bioluminescence. Many say it is re-rideable.
Can I have some more clarification then. This isn't really a boat ride that has a story like say pirates. It's just supposed to immerse you in the scenery and show off the AA.Not my point...
Can I have some more clarification then. This isn't really a boat ride that has a story like say pirates. It's just supposed to immerse you in the scenery and show off the AA.
That would cost as much as the floating mountains probably. The tech is so new I'm guessing it was hard enough to get just that one perfected.I guess I find that concept underwhelming. I would find it better had they managed to create a whole village of these AA's
I guess I find that concept underwhelming. I would find it better had they managed to create a whole village of these AA's
I think this whole discussion is taking place more on the Pandora thread, but just to add my two cents: Having ridden the ride, I actually found the AA underwhelming and the rest of the ride totally fascinating. Clearly YMMV and my opinion does not seem to be the norm in regards to the AA, but I would definitely re-ride for scenery and experience alone.
That would cost as much as the floating mountains probably. The tech is so new I'm guessing it was hard enough to get just that one perfected.
I'm sorry if this has been reported.
Let the Paint the Night rumors begin again:
WDW News Today is reporting that sources at the Disneyland Resort told them that the very popular nighttime parade, Paint the Night, is packed and ready to be sent to an unknown location. They think that the location will be Walt Disney World.
http://wdwnt.com/blog/2017/05/rumor-paint-night-electrical-parade-packed-leave-disneyland-going/
k, but, here's my thing. Disclaimer: I have not stepped foot into Pandora... yet. However, the River Journey seems to focus on this one of a kind AA. In fact, it's the pinnacle of the ride. You take a slow moving ride through, albeit impressive, projection and scenery, to see ONE animatronic singing a song flailing away and then get off the ride. That, to me, is very underwhelming. Now, had they had a WHOLE RIDE of these animatronics, I might be a little more impressed. I'm not really understanding the point of this ride. FOP, even though I have not ridden, and possibly may not be able to (fingers crossed that I've dropped enough lbs) I think is impressive and that just uses tech we already have.
I don't know, but the river ride may be one of those one and done kinda deals.
Avatar is getting very positive reviews. Most say photos dot do the land justice.
Yes the boat ride is short but everyone says the AA is incredible. Other than some issues with the restraint flight of passage has good reviews too. There are numerous reviews out there.
I think this whole discussion is taking place more on the Pandora thread, but just to add my two cents: Having ridden the ride, I actually found the AA underwhelming and the rest of the ride totally fascinating. Clearly YMMV and my opinion does not seem to be the norm in regards to the AA, but I would definitely re-ride for scenery and experience alone.
k, but, here's my thing. Disclaimer: I have not stepped foot into Pandora... yet. However, the River Journey seems to focus on this one of a kind AA. In fact, it's the pinnacle of the ride. You take a slow moving ride through, albeit impressive, projection and scenery, to see ONE animatronic singing a song flailing away and then get off the ride. That, to me, is very underwhelming. Now, had they had a WHOLE RIDE of these animatronics, I might be a little more impressed. I'm not really understanding the point of this ride. FOP, even though I have not ridden, and possibly may not be able to (fingers crossed that I've dropped enough lbs) I think is impressive and that just uses tech we already have.
I don't know, but the river ride may be one of those one and done kinda deals.
So, does it give a peaceful and coolness vibe that one would get years ago on the Land boat ride where all of those plants were around and the growing tech so new? It's like a place of calm in a sea of Disney insanity outside?
Read the micechat Kevin Yee review, I think that's pretty fair. Or the Jim Hill/Len Testa review.Even when I try to be objective...you fall into the snare...
Who's "most"? Objective reviews are near impossible where the "news" comes from...
I said I'd take my time and I'm gonna try to...maybe a few months for shake down.
I've read flyerjab twice...and I'm on the fence there...
What animal kingdom needs is heavy hitters to drive attendance and justify the cost of the park.
"Immersive theming" has become a bit of red herring there, has it not?
Don't believe me...it's disney that has been wrestling with this since 1999...you can choose not to think they are concerned with the money and lack of punch...but that simply isn't true.
Yes I think calming/pleasant would be the best way to put it.So, does it give a peaceful and coolness vibe that one would get years ago on the Land boat ride where all of those plants were around and the growing tech so new? It's like a place of calm in a sea of Disney insanity outside?
Read the micechat Kevin Yee review, I think that's pretty fair. Or the Jim Hill/Len Testa review.
So, does it give a peaceful and coolness vibe that one would get years ago on the Land boat ride where all of those plants were around and the growing tech so new? It's like a place of calm in a sea of Disney insanity outside?