The EMH characters are going because of "lack of demand"
But ... is it possible that the demand really
was low enough that this decision made sense? I realize that if it is something
you want that is being cut, it makes it frustrating and annoying, but that doesn't mean the demand wasn't low. And I don't go by complaints here -- you can find a decently large number of people here on these boards who will complain about almost anything, but we hardly constitute a representative sample, even taking the entire membership as a whole.
I don't know ... none of this makes much sense to me -- from either side of the argument. The idea that this relatively small amount of additional downtime for the monorails will make a big difference in maintenance seems questionable to me, no matter how loud some assert that it is the case. And yet I cannot say for sure that reaction of mine is correct. At the same time, I cannot fathom that Disney would really want to eliminate evening EMH. It isn't just a freebie -- it is something Disney implemented specifically to drive hotel bookings on property. While cutting it would certainly mean a cost savings for Disney in terms of park operations, if that results in a reduction of "heads in beds" that offsets what they save or even possibly surpasses that savings, then it would make no sense -- and I don't for a second believe that Disney executives don't know that. I know some people here want to believe that TPTB are blithering idiots, but I don't buy that either.
It just doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me from any angle. Maybe they don't want to eliminate evening EMH but reduce the guest load. Some people probably stay on-property to get that benefit but don't wind up actually using it much while they're there. If the number of people using it were reduced, it cold still be touted as a benefit while also saving the company some money, if only because staffing of cast members during EMH could be reduced. Really, if they wanted to save money on EMH and want to cite reduced demand for doing so, it seems to me that
morning EMH would be a more ripe target -- it attracts far smaller crowds (which is, of course, one of the reason those who
do attend like it so much). But they aren't talking (so far) about changing the monorail system's morning hours.
Further, I can't see that Disney is just not willing to spend money on the parks. That flies in the face of the ongoing Fantasyland expansion, the new Star Tours -- even a show like
The Magic, the Memories and You. All of those things cost money (
loads of it, in most cases), and the latter could even be seen as keeping people out of shops and restaurants at a time when they might otherwise visit them.
I just cannot see why this is being done -- from either side of the fence. That being said, I don't like to jump to the conclusion that people are lying to me just because they've made a decision I don't particularly like, especially when I lack hard evidence to support such a view -- and the fact that some guests are angry about the decision is not hard evidence. I think people tend to believe that others think as they do, which always makes me wonder about cynical and pessimistic people, and those who presume dishonesty in others as an initial reaction. So, for now, I'll accept the explanation that maintenance is the primary motivation behind this. That said, I would like to hear a more thorough explanation of how this aids the quest to keep the monorail system running in nominal condition. Whether we'll actually get that is another question -- and Disney certainly has no obligation to provide such a thing, although I hope they will.
Scott