I understand the basis of your argument and it is correct. My only point is that it is an impercetible affect the vast majority of the time. In reality, it only "frees" up another room for someone else if the hotel is fully booked such that the someone else wouldn't have been able to book a room otherwise. So, unless the rooms are sold out, the same number of people will be at the resort whether the family of five stuffs into the 1BR or takes the 2BR.
Do you have any way to calculate how much additional wear and tear a particualr 1 BR will have if it is occasionally "stuffed" with 5 people instead of 4? Won't the same amount of wear and tear occur if the family takes a 2BR instead, it will just be in a different unit. Wear and Tear is based on the number of people using stuff and walking around, regardless of what room they are in. So the resort overall will experience the same level of use by the family of 5 regardless of what unit they are in.
Either way, I doubt each unit gets "stuffed" often enough to overall affect the crowd level at the resort or the wear rate of any particular room. I'm not talking about some radical abuse event like 10 people bouncing on a bed every night. I'm talking about a standard situation of two parents and three kids. I'm quite confident that if we were able to conduct a three year study of a control room that always had a strict limit of 4 persons and one that occassionally was "stuffed" with 5 people, no one would be able to tell the difference.
I find this whole debate petty and unnecessary. JMHO of course.
Do you have any way to calculate how much additional wear and tear a particualr 1 BR will have if it is occasionally "stuffed" with 5 people instead of 4? Won't the same amount of wear and tear occur if the family takes a 2BR instead, it will just be in a different unit. Wear and Tear is based on the number of people using stuff and walking around, regardless of what room they are in. So the resort overall will experience the same level of use by the family of 5 regardless of what unit they are in.
Either way, I doubt each unit gets "stuffed" often enough to overall affect the crowd level at the resort or the wear rate of any particular room. I'm not talking about some radical abuse event like 10 people bouncing on a bed every night. I'm talking about a standard situation of two parents and three kids. I'm quite confident that if we were able to conduct a three year study of a control room that always had a strict limit of 4 persons and one that occassionally was "stuffed" with 5 people, no one would be able to tell the difference.
I find this whole debate petty and unnecessary. JMHO of course.

This is not true. If one gets two rooms no one else can get that room. If one rooms stuffs, not only will the wear and tear on that given unit be affected adversely but so will the density of all applicable issues. If you only get one unit and go over, then there will be someone else in the next unit with their cars and numbers added to the mix.
Any resort or hotel assumes that there will be less than maximum usage. So if you have 9 in a 2 BR and the next 2 BR has 6, that does not make up for the room stuffing in any way. The fact that there are other factors that also tend to increase maint costs is not applicable because they tend to be additive. But the point was that how one uses the resort does affect other people, it is not a victimless crime. We can then discuss how much it affects maint, etc and also rank different issues that tend to raise costs. Actually smoking is likely the largest single controllable cost.