Wow, I think that I am borderline now on who I should vote for.... Thanks for changing my mind by giving actual substance to why Kerry should be voted for!!!
tit for tat, tit for tat
Originally posted by wvrevy
See, this is how well misinformation works in a campaign....The votes you're taloking about were also supported by the Secretary of Defense at the time: one Dick Cheney. The only "abscense of casting votes" Kerry has had has been during the campaign, and he has returned when he felt his vote would be necessary to change the outcome of a vote.
I don't think Cheney voted to reduce Intelligence spending, especially after the first WTC bombing. And isn't it telling that Kerry didn't want to go on record unless he was to cast the deciding vote?
You're joking, right ? This president has spent more "vacation" days outside the white house than any president in history, and you're honestly saying you're more worried about Kerry's attendance record ?!?
Oh come on, thats a shallow indictment.

The president doesn't really go on vacation other than changing his schedule for a short time being. He has almost all of his staff travel with him. Plus, we are in an age where electronic communcation makes him available at a moments notice.
And what is Kerry's excuse for missing so many meetings? What did he have to do that was so important to take him away from his elected duties? Can't answer that one can we?
I wonder if George did anything like this while defending Alabama from the Viet Cong ?
Probably not or we would have heard about it now. And this defends Kerry how? Please, straight up, do you think this was strange? Have you heard anyone do this before? Maybe Patton? Maybe JFK? And, if it was true, what is your impression of that person?
Yes, because eyewitnesses should certainly be disbelieved when you've got a bunch of people with agendas going on hearsay
Ask yourself this: in a court of law, would those "200+" even be heard, since they weren't even there at the time ?
The 200+ I heard was there either as other ships in combat, support personnel, or in command. Are you going to tell me that 200+ persons lied? Maybe Kerry can go back to Cambodia and find another 193 some odd persons to support him. Maybe Cambodia is where the actual retaping of battle scenes took place.
Oh, please. John Kerry went to war. He became disillusioned. He returned and spoke out against the war. What is so awfully damaging to the USA about that ?
Ohhh, I don't know. I will go ask a V'Nam Vet and tell me what he thinks about it.
And with a single statement you blithely excuse the hypocrisy of accusing Kerry of flip-flopping while doing exactly the same thing. Kerry's changes of mind sometimes came over decades, yet there couldn't have been anything that actually caused that change of heart other than politics, right ?
No, there could be other reasons such as not knowing truly what he has said before. Interesting that he doesn't admit that he has changed his mind... for personal reasons or not. And all of these 'changes of mind' seem to be in front of the mindset he speaks to. Funny isn't it?
Again, you're joking, right ? Bush won't answer questions posed him by reporters, and his cronies have turned questioning him into an unpatriotic act, but Kerry is the arrogant one ?
When has Kerry ever given any indication he would "back down", other than saying that the US has no right to completely ignore world opinion and trample on other countries ?
Bush doesn't have to answer some questions just as Kerry doesn't answer them either. You can't tell me that you don't think Kerry is arrogant.

He is a regular Ward Clever!!!
You're reading Kerry differently than I am. I think he would have continued to wait for the world to approval American Military action that was in the best, very best interest of the USA. I think he would allow the other world leaders to persude him to not take action when it is obvious (to some

) that action needed to be taken for our interests.
But there's not a single issue of substance in this list that doesn't apply just as strongly to Bush, if not more so.
I agree to some degree. With most politicians, you can compare them and see how they have very similar experences and such. And it comes down the individual that does the comparisons and how they interpret them. I see Kerry as the worst candidate in my comparisons.... YMMV.
