I asked a similar question earlier, but differently.
Jon (implied or stated) that he went under the advice of his attorney to violate his contract.
Would that be a just reason to depose an attorney?
He can decline under attorney/client privilege, but if Jon were to say "my attorney said it was okay" as his defense (for example), that is hearsay and hearsay usually is not admissable. And Jon can't speak for his attorney who is available to speak for himself, right? (inquiry--I'm not really debating, just trying to sort through why they are deposing him.)
******
I think folks were mentioning this lawsuit is in MD as that is where HQ for TLC is or something. I'm also wondering if there is an open records law.
Folks get all in a snit down here b/c of all the info being released on the Casey Anthony Case, but we have sunshine laws and public record is public record and something like all evidence or something has to be released before trial. So we can (if we chose) read miles and miles and miles of legalize pertaining to the case. People like to blame the prosecution (including the defense team whose legal training at times seem to match mine), but they are doing what the law requires.
Does anyone know if MD has a similar law?
Goodness only knows! My gut feeling: all of the above stuff in the headlines is lawyer-speak.
I'm not a lawyer, and I don't think it matters what our non-lawyer opinions are any more, All of this is now in the court systems of PA (the divorce and possible violation of child labor laws) and Maryland (the alleged breach of contract and Jon's countersuit.)
I'm hoping that most of this will be settled out of court. For the protection of the children.
I just hope that the children ARE protected as far as possible. General you, YMMV.