Jodi Arias Trial Part 5, starting with Violet STILLLLL rambling April 4

[Luv'sTink]

However, the DT seems to be all smiles. Crazy!

 

[MaryAnnDVC]

The DT looked like they just had a big WIN. After all, it PROVES that Jodi's story (the 3rd one ) was true. I don't think this changes a thing. Obviously if she was taking a series of pictures she didn't have a weapon in her hand. So how long does it take to get out a weapon that was stashed on her or nearby? Idiots.

 

[Thumper_Man]

Then what is the point to the picture?

It's been suggested that she was holding a knife or pointing a gun at TA while she was taking the picture. Defense stated earlier that this verifies JA's testimony that she was holding a camera at the time, and nothing else.

 

[Uncle Remus]

Anyone hear if the judge is going to address the Laviolette issue tomorrow, is that still on?

 

[Thumper_Man]

However, the DT seems to be all smiles. Crazy!

The DT looked like they just had a big WIN. After all, it PROVES that Jodi's story (the 3rd one ) was true. I don't think this changes a thing. Obviously if she was taking a series of pictures she didn't have a weapon in her hand. So how long does it take to get out a weapon that was stashed on her or nearby? Idiots.

Well even the sun shines on a dog's. Well you know. Let them have their little victory. I believe they're still losing the war.

This doesn't prove that she still didn't have it on her somewhere.

 

[WPack911]

I guess the State reconsidered calling one of it's previous witness' science not reliable. Probably a good idea, wouldn't want any convictions based on this expert's work in other cases questioned.

I don't think it had anything to do with that, probably more to do with just wanting to get the trial moving again and not having to go through an yet another DT witness.

 

[Luv'sTink]

What I don't get about her..."he body slammed me, because I dropped the camera" is he was sitting down in the shower..... She dropped the camera, he had to get up then reach out or step out and grab her. So he did that without saying a word? Then started yelling obscenities at her? Otherwise she had time to move away from him.

 

[Thumper_Man]

Anyone hear if the judge is going to address the Laviolette issue tomorrow, is that still on?

Being that was in sealed chambers, we may not know until after the trial.

 

[MaryAnnDVC]

It's been suggested that she was holding a knife or pointing a gun at TA while she was taking the picture. Defense stated earlier that this verifies JA's testimony that she was holding a camera at the time, and nothing else.

Did the prosecution ever claim that she was holding a weapon when she took that picture? I don't recall hearing that and I never thought that, even tho some people have suggested it explained the look of "fear" on his face, which I also never thought.

 

[Luv'sTink]

Did the prosecution ever claim that she was holding a weapon when she took that picture? I don't recall hearing that and I never thought that, even tho some people have suggested it explained the look of "fear" on his face, which I also never thought.

The first I ever heard of being able to see something in his eye was on this website and then other websites had the picture blown up. They are obviously watching the stuff on the web closely, the DT.

But what others said they could outline was not like what this guy said he could outline.

 

[Uncle Remus]

Being that was in sealed chambers, we may not know until after the trial.

So they did have that hearing? I had other things to do so lost track of the progress this afternoon.

I can't wait to read those closed hearings' transcripts when they're unsealed.

 

[Thumper_Man]

Did the prosecution ever claim that she was holding a weapon when she took that picture? I don't recall hearing that and I never thought that, even tho some people have suggested it explained the look of "fear" on his face, which I also never thought.

I missed the beginning of the trial, so I don't know if it was ever brought up by the Prosecution or not.

One fact remains though, JA is still the one that took the picture.

 

[usnuzuloose]

Did the prosecution ever claim that she was holding a weapon when she took that picture? I don't recall hearing that and I never thought that, even tho some people have suggested it explained the look of "fear" on his face, which I also never thought.

I don't think that was ever brought into question as far as I know. The juror's would not know anything about that anyway. So it is done and dealt with.

 

[PizzieDuster]

Wow, what a video. That made you feel like you were there, scary.

That was very graphic....it showed some awful stuff....very graphic. That's it...I'll keep this on the trial now.

 

[Thumper_Man]

So they did have that hearing? I had other things to do so lost track of the progress this afternoon.

I can't wait to read those closed hearings' transcripts when they're unsealed.

I never read or saw anything on twitter regarding this (or any place else for that matter). You're guess is as good as mine. If not today, then for sure tomorrow. Judge gave her an option of which day to be there.

 

[Uncle Remus]

I never read or saw anything on twitter regarding this (or any place else for that matter). You're guess is as good as mine. If not today, then for sure tomorrow. Judge gave her an option of which day to be there.

Ah, okay, thanks.

 

[MaryAnnDVC]

The first I ever heard of being able to see something in his eye was on this website and then other websites had the picture blown up. They are obviously watching the stuff on the web closely, the DT.

But what others said they could outline was not like what this guy said he could outline.

I don't think that was ever brought into question as far as I know. The juror's would not know anything about that anyway. So it is done and dealt with.

I'm just saying that I don't think that the prosecution ever claimed she was holding a weapon when she took the picture, so the defense now saying that the picture proves she wasn't holding a weapon means, basically, nothing.

One of the dead at the Boston Marathon bombing is an 8 yr old. An 8 yr old died, and Jodi Arias is a snotty breathing little piece of **** murderer. Makes me sick.

 

[WPack911]

That was very graphic....it showed some awful stuff....very graphic. That's it...I'll keep this on the trial now.

Indeed, that was about as graphic and real and scary as it gets.

 

[lorimay]

I never thought she had the knife in her hand when she was taking pictures.

He would not have looked so calm.

She put camera down and grabbed that knife from her pants.

The DT can be all happy, but I don't think this makes a big difference for state.
He will put it all together in his closing.

Does this mean that the idiots are going to rest tomorrow and JM will start rebuttal?

 

[Brit17]

I am so confused ... So the judge read the stipulation that it was Jodi's reflection in the photo and she was not holding a weapon ... Ok ... So ...

1. Why did JM concede that it was actually JA in that photo at all when he thought it was a dog? ..

2. I don't think that JM ever said that JA was actually holding a weapon while taking the photos of TA in the shower in the first place, so why is the DT looking so full of themselves? ... it doesn't mean that JA didn't have a weapon on the floor, behind her, in her sock, in a pocket, hidden under something, etc. ...

3. The judge told the jury to be there 9:30am tomorrow, does that mean they are done with all things Violet? ...

Sidebar - I could never be a defense attorney ... How can Nurmi and Willie sit there looking all smug working to get a cold-blooded murderer free? ... How do they sleep at night? ... I know I couldn't do it that's for sure ...