Please don't start this non-argument all over again. I have said several times in this thread that it is not and the "individual level" as you put it.
I am not sure what exactly you call non-argument, considering you and others do argue balancing things out. So, why balance of a group even matter if it does not change negative affect on a individual?
As of now, system works perfectly fine and as a group everything is in balance. Yet, former late FP argue individual affect on their trip, so it is only logical to put away any statistical theories and see things from individual point of view or as I call it "individual affect".



