Hi
I can't say i blame you!!
Its funny though because I'm in the opposite situation.....
I have 4 children, who are 7,5,3 and 11 months
When we went in March my 3 year old was just over 2 and a half and because that meant I had 2 children and 2 infants we could stay in one room at SL (for some reason the rooms at sL allow 2 infants??)
My 7 and 5 year old would have a meal each and because they are also only small there was easily enough food for all 3 of them to split and share.
BUT this time we are going to book for december and my 3 year old is 3yr 2 months - so because of this 2 months (over 3) we have to have 2 seperate rooms even though they are all small and will share one double bed anyway so 1 room will be totally un used!!!
And he will get free food which is great but there is no way they will all eat large meals so I'll have loads of spare food too!!
This thread got me wondering..... If people do it this way round (saying child is over 3) how many must do it other way round and say child is under 3 when there not???/
I wouldn't dare try it although I'm sure they didn't check kids passports last time i went. I just know they would this time!!
Not moaning just think its funny how people have different needs and things that suit one family doesn't suit another??
And that I have to pay over double what I paid 9 months ago because of 2 months!!!!!
But hey!
