DizWacko said:
There is NEVER an excuse to walk into a dirty hotel room... NONE!. You are saying there is NO reasonable way to correct this issue beyond the rate at which rooms are cleaned now? Are you serious? How about having an inspector walk into each room before the guest checks in? Is this really that difficult or that expensive? Do you really need a high-paid skilled person to do this? Would this really effect the P&L of the operation that much?
And your personal experiences are not necessarily the norm. Dont forget the few posters on this board where this wasnt a one time thing.
You could probably use a refresher on quality control/continuous improvement. It is more expensive in the long-run to have customers find defects than it is to correct them BEFORE the customer has discovered them. And regarding the insects in the flour analogy, does those insect rates in any way effect the customer satisfaction with that product?
This gets more hilarious by the post; it's so obvious when someone responds without actually reading - and comprehending - my post. (I actually had to check to make sure I hadn't fallen for some Troll bait!

).
First, there's one simple excuse for walking into a dirty room - human error. Housekeeping checked off the wrong room, front desk mis-read the screen, scheduler had a brain bubble, etc. Add in computer error, and it's obvious - at least, IMHO, to any reasonable person who's ever made a mistake - that the assignment of a dirty room will happen every now and then.
Now for the not-reading-my-post part: I DID suggest options - in fact, I suggested the more/better housekeepers and a
DVC ROOM INSPECTOR. But not only will this increase cost (how many DRI's will it take to check SSR on Friday, when all the point-watchers move off-site/Value?) but still have that pesky old human element.
As for a refresher in QA/QC/CI - thanks, but not needed. I wrote statistical simulation software for manufacturing engineering / digital factory environments and yes, Six Sigma blah, W. Edwards Deming blah, process control blah. But that oft-quoted (and, to be honest, usually appropriate) comment about 'cheaper to find a defect before the customer does' really was meant to apply to manufacturing, at least originally - and doesn't ALWAYS apply, particularly when dealing with a service. Besides, from a more cynical POV, what happens to DVC's "P&L" when a DVC owner finds a dirty room? Nothing, AFAIK; a little lost goodwill, but DVC seems to be selling quite well - which is where DVC makes the $$$.
Again, I think it would really stink to open the door to my DVC Villa and see blood on the sheets (and hair in the fridge and CSI-type things in the closet). I'd also like to be guaranteed a non-HC room, and I'd like free DAILY HK. But how much extra is the group of DVC owners, as a whole, willing to pay to reduce (remember, perfection is an unattainable goal) the occurance of what appears to be (anecdotal evidence only) a small number of these unfortunate events?
Be well!