This depends on the state laws. It can be quite complicated regarding who pays for what and where it comes from.Insurance will also conducting their own independent investigation especially if occupants have injuries to claim where it makes sense to go after the insurance to pay for their medical bills.
Haha.You always notice
I know who was driving because within hours of the accident, my friend from the back seat had told his family who was driving, and one of his family members had told me. The original information he shared with his family does not match what the driver told police.
Having dealt with a car accident fatality in AK, I know how you can be unsure of law enforcement actually getting to the truth (or wanting to). But since it's a fatality hopefully the troopers help out in the investigation. I know that they have the ability to figure out a lot of what us "civilians" wouldn't be able to.I have a lot of doubt that any of them would be wearing gloves or big coats. They are all weather-resistant Alaska kids and I don’t think they would wear gloves or coats unless going to do snow sports or snow activities.
You found the death of OP's friend..."interesting?"Interesting first post.
Sorry about your friend.
You found the death of OP's friend..."interesting?"
Welcome to the dis, Aaden.Hey there. I came across this old forum post and wanted to offer my thoughts. I'm sorry to hear about your friend's tragic accident. While it's been some time since this post was made, it's always worth reaching out to a private investigator for a fresh perspective.
Do you know any good PI's, Aaden?it's always worth reaching out to a private investigator for a fresh perspective.
Anyone else ever wonder if writers pop up here to test a plot for believability?
I don't get why they won't just submit the question and openly admit that it's a hypothetical for a novel, or whatever.Anyone else ever wonder if writers pop up here to test a plot for believability?
That's the obvious answer. There are two survivors, not counting the actual driver.Well ...the answer is simple Watson. The other survivor(s) would/should know who was driving![]()
BUT, this was posted over a year ago. I doubt a private investigator would be able to get much now.I can almost guarantee that no DNA was lifted from steering wheel or fingerprints taken. Accident investigators usually do not do such things especially if they feel confident of whom was driving and that physical evidence and occupant and witness statements support each other. Also steering wheels are usually textured or dimpled and are very hard to pull identifiable fingerprints from. Many times you have to have an independent investigator or insurance investigator do such things if there is a question such as in this case. I don't want to discourage, but in most cases these vehicles have no windows and are left in tow lots, exposed to the elements, so DNA evidence gets compromised, not to mention chain of custody problems.
Civil lawsuit I am sure.That's the obvious answer. There are two survivors, not counting the actual driver.
BUT, this was posted over a year ago. I doubt a private investigator would be able to get much now.
I do remember though, when I was a senior in HS, we had a "caravan" of cars going out to lunch. The lead car got into an accident (no injuries that I remember). About a decade later, I had an investigator (maybe a lawyer?) contact me saying they were looking into that accident and wanted to know what I remembered. I thought that was really strange.
I'm sure. But after such a long time? For, from what I can remember, a "routine" accident?Civil lawsuit I am sure.
Maybe initially, but life has taught me that the stranger a story is, the more likely it is to be true.Anyone else ever wonder if writers pop up here to test a plot for believability?