How Much Is Too Much For A Buffet?

I don't know that the majority of WDW guests are on the DDP as it depends on what percentage of guests is staying on property and of those - did they opt for DDP. I have to think that more people are probably NOT on the DDP. Which is what makes the price increases so extraordinary to me.

What is the percentage of guests staying on property on a given day - anyone know?
Melissa, it's not that simple. On any given day, less than half the people in the parks are staying on property. BUT, and it's a big but, most of those staying off property are in one of 2 groups; first time visitors that haven't done much planning, and people trying to save money. Both of these groups end up eating mostly qs meals plus eating some meals off property. So most of the TS customers are on property, and most of these have DDP. I am a big guy, so it suits me to a T. But after several of yours(and Eliza's) posts I realize it ain't for everybody.
I want to know, though, who are all these children not eating enough to be a value. I have been a cook for over 30 years. The last 7 have been in a children's behavioral hospital. These kids flat out eat. The little boys are always wanting more. The teen girls put away as much as the teen guys, which is a ton. I think a lot of folks are projecting their suspicions on their kids. BTW, we have some picky eaters, but I would put it under 15%. They eat lasagna, all kinds of Mexican, all kinds of Italian, Chinese, chicken, beef, pork, turkey. We offer ham, turkey and pb & j sammies for those who don't want what we're serving. But since 'Mom' ain't there to fix them what they 'demand', they eat what we have.
 
CP is $37 now? Are you kidding? :eek:

YEAP!! Can you believe that, and that's not for peak times either! I was sticker shocked when we went there for dinner 2 weeks ago. I thought it was around $32 a person. Minus the 20% with the TIW card puts it pretty well under $30 pp which is reasonable (by WDW standards), but not when it's $37 pp. This was the first (and last time) we went there for dinner.

We've done lunch so many times and loved it I thought we'd go for dinner to see what the difference was and the only difference I noticed was the PRICE and the absence of the pecan squares I love for dessert! :(

I saw the price when we checked in and did a double take realizing I looked at the lunch price by mistake when made the original ADR online (dah! my mistake, but won't make that again) but at that point it was too late to go somewhere else unless we wanted to eat at 10:00 at night.

The thing that bothered me the most is that we could have easily eaten at a signature restaurant for the same price. My dd is 12 and doesn't eat much from the adult buffet. But at 12 she is charged the adult price which somehow:sad2:: doesn't seem reasonable for chicken nuggets, pizza and mac n cheese even with Pooh characters.

The difference in price between lunch and dinner is quite substantial. You can almost pay for another adult at lunch for the difference and the food items are not justifiable for the difference in price for the 2 meals IMHO.:confused3

So, for us...too much is when I look at the price and do a double take..any of the princess meals (not just buffets) and CMs makes me do that double take!:sad2:
 
I called today.. got a VERYY!! nice CM,, anne, from Il, anyway. it's true! for value season in Sept. Boma is about $35!!!!

unless you are A very BIG EATER.. how is it worth it? this is only a way to make them seem like purchasing the DDP is "saving" you so much!

hubby and I are BIG Disney fans. visit at least 2X a year. we are SO disapointed!!!
 
Melissa, it's not that simple. On any given day, less than half the people in the parks are staying on property. BUT, and it's a big but, most of those staying off property are in one of 2 groups; first time visitors that haven't done much planning, and people trying to save money. Both of these groups end up eating mostly qs meals plus eating some meals off property. So most of the TS customers are on property, and most of these have DDP. I am a big guy, so it suits me to a T. But after several of yours(and Eliza's) posts I realize it ain't for everybody.
I want to know, though, who are all these children not eating enough to be a value. I have been a cook for over 30 years. The last 7 have been in a children's behavioral hospital. These kids flat out eat. The little boys are always wanting more. The teen girls put away as much as the teen guys, which is a ton. I think a lot of folks are projecting their suspicions on their kids. BTW, we have some picky eaters, but I would put it under 15%. They eat lasagna, all kinds of Mexican, all kinds of Italian, Chinese, chicken, beef, pork, turkey. We offer ham, turkey and pb & j sammies for those who don't want what we're serving. But since 'Mom' ain't there to fix them what they 'demand', they eat what we have.

I agree! Most people are getting the DP, or else Disney wouldn't work the DP the way they do. They also wouldn't be using it for Free Dining. It's their cash cow. You have a captive audience for people on property, and even for those who are not staying on property, many of them still eat at character meals, so they now have to incur the huge cash prices, or, the next time they come, stay on property to buy the DP. This is a perk that Disney greatly advertises.

My kids have been eating adult food since they were a little over a year. There are no hotdogs and mac and cheese in this house. My 3 year old baby boy eats more than me, and our DD7, eats more than my hubby most nights. We've done DxDP with our kids several times, as they love: fish, grilled chicken, appetizers, soup, etc. We've had DDE/Tables in Wonderland for years, due to the healthy eating habits in our household. We eat well at home, with fresh fruits/veggies, grilled meats, soups, etc., so we do on vacation as well.

Many of the kids' meals at Disney are yucky, so we share our adult meals, and in many cases, we've even paid out of pocket, except when at a buffet. We've eaten at all buffets a million times over the years, as they were the most value for us, as there was something for everyone. Not anymore. After having eaten at 2-3 TS meals per day (including Signatures) for years, we have cut out all TS meals, except for Kona Cafe for our trip in a few weeks, and we still haven't decided for July yet. We are looking forward to saving thousands of dollars per year on Disney food!


YEAP!! Can you believe that, and that's not for peak times either! I was sticker shocked when we went there for dinner 2 weeks ago. I thought it was around $32 a person. Minus the 20% with the TIW card puts it pretty well under $30 pp which is reasonable (by WDW standards), but not when it's $37 pp. This was the first (and last time) we went there for dinner.

We've done lunch so many times and loved it I thought we'd go for dinner to see what the difference was and the only difference I noticed was the PRICE and the absence of the pecan squares I love for dessert! :(

I saw the price when we checked in and did a double take realizing I looked at the lunch price by mistake when made the original ADR online (dah! my mistake, but won't make that again) but at that point it was too late to go somewhere else unless we wanted to eat at 10:00 at night.

The thing that bothered me the most is that we could have easily eaten at a signature restaurant for the same price. My dd is 12 and doesn't eat much from the adult buffet. But at 12 she is charged the adult price which somehow:sad2:: doesn't seem reasonable for chicken nuggets, pizza and mac n cheese even with Pooh characters.

The difference in price between lunch and dinner is quite substantial. You can almost pay for another adult at lunch for the difference and the food items are not justifiable for the difference in price for the 2 meals IMHO.:confused3

So, for us...too much is when I look at the price and do a double take..any of the princess meals (not just buffets) and CMs makes me do that double take!:sad2:

There is hardly that much difference been CP lunch and dinner - been eating lunch for years, as we have no interest in paying $10.00/pp for pretty much the same thing for dinner.

If you check on my link, you'll see the current peak and non-peak buffet times. Wasn't able to get them all, but most are there.

I realized I forgot to put the link to my 2011 buffet prices thread, sorry!:

http://www.disboards.com/showthread.php?t=2627843

As you can see, some dinner buffets during peak season, are approaching close to $50.00/adult, and that is without tip included. The prices are beyond ridiculous, so it would seem that most people will do on the DP. If you have children under 9, it's a no brainer, since if you eat at 1 buffet meal, you have already gone over the cost of that child's DP, and you still have CS and a snack to use up.

Disney are marketing geniuses for a reason, and the overinflation of meals is one prime example. When Signatures are now almost or even cheaper in some cases than character meals, it tells us that most people are dining at character meals, and thus, the crazy prices. Disney jacks up prices due to usage demands - if you want it, you'll pay for it!

Tiger
 

Local dinner theatres and shows are comparably priced or higher than Disbuffets albeit with a little more entertainment than just a character interaction.Then again if those places had a Nemo or Princesses that were required to appease the kids they'd get more $$$.I had avoided Disbuffets for a long time after experiences that left us unhappy with the food.Recently the princesses in the family got us to go to 1900PF and we were all pleasantly surprised.
 
So, at what price point does a person say, "That's too much, I'm not eating there"?
For me, it was $40 (+ gratuity) for Boma dinner. We were going to eat there on our arrival night because I've wanted to try it, but $40/pp is just too much for one meal. We opted not to get the dining plan this trip for various reasons, but I'm tempted to get it in the future so I can "justify" trying some of these outrageously priced meals.

I will pay $20+ per adult for a character breakfast because in that case part of the cost is for "entertainment." (And I have a 2-year-old.) Same thing with Biergarten; there's live music so part of the price is to cover that. But for just food & no show, $30-$40 per adult is too much.
 
With the cost of buffets going up, the average person can easily save 20% off their dining (Disney's figures) if they purchased the same food cash.

table service credit:
Biergarten buffet dinner - $34.99 + 6.5% tax = $37.27

Counter service credit (Sunshine Seasons)
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Turkey and Monterey Jack Cheese on Foccacia $8.59[/FONT]
Strawberry Shortcake $3.99
Fanta $2.39
= 14.97 + 6.5% tax = $15.94

Snack credit (from cart somewhere in the park):
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Mickey's Premium Ice Cream Bar $3.50[/FONT]

Total - 37.27 + 15.94 + 3.50 = 56.71
cost of the dining plan $45 (non peak).
You are saving 20%.

I did not choose the most expensive of anything for that day either.

Previously on the dining plan, buffets were not always a good value. With the current pricing structure though, buffets on the dining plan can be just as good OR BETTER of a value than eating at a sit down, menu restaurant.

Paying cash, you need to determine that based on your eating habits, age factors, touring plans, etc.

Personally, if paying cash I don't think I'd choose to pay $35 for the Biergarten. On the dining plan though, a meal credit is a meal credit. It doesn't matter if one meal "costs" me $28 or $35 or $42. It's one meal credit.

Like the numbers, but you forgot the 18% gratuity at the Biergarten, so essentially the cost of the dining plan would come in around $52, making a roughly $5 difference (or a little over 10%).

A savings is a savings though, it's just not that much in my mind. Especially when I can run off-site and eat at Sweet Tomatoes for around $15 total.
 
I have paid that much for a non Disney Brunch at the Gaylord Texan so I think $90 isn't too bad
 
Like the numbers, but you forgot the 18% gratuity at the Biergarten, so essentially the cost of the dining plan would come in around $52, making a roughly $5 difference (or a little over 10%).

A savings is a savings though, it's just not that much in my mind. Especially when I can run off-site and eat at Sweet Tomatoes for around $15 total.
You would hopefully still be tipping if not on the dining plan, so that's a wash.
 
Melissa, it's not that simple. On any given day, less than half the people in the parks are staying on property. BUT, and it's a big but, most of those staying off property are in one of 2 groups; first time visitors that haven't done much planning, and people trying to save money. Both of these groups end up eating mostly qs meals plus eating some meals off property.

You forgot group 3 - Local residents & day-trippers who don't need to stay on property.
 
You forgot group 3 - Local residents & day-trippers who don't need to stay on property.

That's what I was thinking. It doesn't make sense to me that most people would be on DDP. I know it is or at least has been a cash maker for Disney - well now that they've tweaked all the menus and reduced what's on them and changed what is included with the plan. Although I guess that has been the restaurants' response to the flat reimbursement rate from Disniey...but since most people aren't staying on property and of those that are not all are on the plan - :confused3

Ahhh - like I said, I'm not a fan. We we do opt for the DDP on occasion. We calculate out intricately what the costs are and where we can eat so that we maximize our money - I won't pay for it unless I can beat its cost with where we eat. Convenience means nothing!!!:rotfl2:
 
Like the numbers, but you forgot the 18% gratuity at the Biergarten, so essentially the cost of the dining plan would come in around $52, making a roughly $5 difference (or a little over 10%).

A savings is a savings though, it's just not that much in my mind. Especially when I can run off-site and eat at Sweet Tomatoes for around $15 total.

The recommended gratuity % is the same whether paying cash or using the dining plan.
 
The way I see it, if I got the salmon entree at Coral Reef, that alone would cost me $24. Even if Boma is $38 that means that for $14 more I'm getting an appetizer, a drink, and dessert.
Coral Reef would cost $7 for an appetizer, $24 for the entree, $6 dessert and $3 soft drink (approximate costs from all ears' menu). That's $40 and I can't get seconds of anything.
For us Boma is still a good deal and so is Cape May.

But the character meals... I love CP and CM, but the food belongs in a high school cafeteria. CM's dinner in particular is awful. My mom really wanted to do CM for breakfast this trip, until I told her to expect to pay $30 for overcooked scrambled eggs, a stale bagel and bad coffee.
 
That's what I was thinking. It doesn't make sense to me that most people would be on DDP. I know it is or at least has been a cash maker for Disney - well now that they've tweaked all the menus and reduced what's on them and changed what is included with the plan. Although I guess that has been the restaurants' response to the flat reimbursement rate from Disniey...but since most people aren't staying on property and of those that are not all are on the plan - :confused3

Ahhh - like I said, I'm not a fan. We we do opt for the DDP on occasion. We calculate out intricately what the costs are and where we can eat so that we maximize our money - I won't pay for it unless I can beat its cost with where we eat. Convenience means nothing!!!:rotfl2:

I don't know why you are so sure that most guests are not staying on property?

I did some research and this is what I came up with:

Disney World - close to 26,000 hotel rooms with an average occupancy rate of close to 80% (can't get specifics as they don't release actual figures), and during peak times like Christmas, it is close to 100% occupancy. Orlando hotels are never close to 100% based on the research I did.

Orlando - can't find how many hotel rooms, but Central Florida, which is made up of 9 counties, of which Orlando is one of them, has 110,000 rooms. They report an occupancy of between 60 - 80% depending upon the time of year. Central Florida is a very big area, comprised of Orlando (theme parks, convention center), Cocoa Beach/Port Canaveral (cruises), Melbourne (Kennedy Space Station), and some other major areas such as Daytona Beach.

It is hard to know how many guests stay on property vs. off property because I can't find number of hotel rooms in Orlando. Plus, Orlando has Sea World and Universal, and some of the hotels service these parks, plus it has a massive convention center as well.

Everyone I know only stays on Disney property, but it would be interesting to see what the numbers are. Since Disney keeps building more hotel rooms, and DVC is at an all-time high, I still think a huge amount of guests stay on property. If we just counted guests who only went to Disney, it would be interesting to see these numbers.

Tiger
 
I don't know why you are so sure that most guests are not staying on property?

I did some research and this is what I came up with:

Disney World - close to 26,000 hotel rooms with an average occupancy rate of close to 80% (can't get specifics as they don't release actual figures), and during peak times like Christmas, it is close to 100% occupancy. Orlando hotels are never close to 100% based on the research I did.

Orlando - can't find how many hotel rooms, but Central Florida, which is made up of 9 counties, of which Orlando is one of them, has 110,000 rooms. They report an occupancy of between 60 - 80% depending upon the time of year. Central Florida is a very big area, comprised of Orlando (theme parks, convention center), Cocoa Beach/Port Canaveral (cruises), Melbourne (Kennedy Space Station), and some other major areas such as Daytona Beach.

It is hard to know how many guests stay on property vs. off property because I can't find number of hotel rooms in Orlando. Plus, Orlando has Sea World and Universal, and some of the hotels service these parks, plus it has a massive convention center as well.

Everyone I know only stays on Disney property, but it would be interesting to see what the numbers are. Since Disney keeps building more hotel rooms, and DVC is at an all-time high, I still think a huge amount of guests stay on property. If we just counted guests who only went to Disney, it would be interesting to see these numbers.

Tiger

It could be because my mom lives in Clermont and we have so many friends down there, that I know as many people who go that don't stay on property as people who do. We come down 192 when we stay at my moms and see those people just in general, we tend to drive and park even when we're at DVC so we see the full lots - mostly non resort guests - and we know so many people that just go for the day. I have friends here at home in TN that go to Disney and vary on and off site. I have one girlfriend (family of 5) that is going in a few weeks. Has 2 table service meals a day reserved and is staying off property - found a beautiful, new 3 bedroom for under $200 a night.

If roughly 20,000 rooms have 4 people each - 80,000 people total to spread between all the parks on a given day. Just rough averages based on your numbers - not exact at all. Most sources say the average annual attendance at Magic Kingdom is around 16 + million - roughly 45,000 a day in 2006. Obviously some days way way over and some way under. That is over half of all guests on propery each day. Leaving the rest to be divided between 3 parks, 2 water parks or whatever they happen to be doing thay day.

Its probably close to 50/50 depending on the park and the day. During peak times it would tip to off property as Disney rooms are a stable number, but park attendance increases significantly. During off season the opposite would happen.

I think too, we have to consider that resort occupancy does not necessarily reflect park attendance and vice versa. To what impact that has on dining I don't know. The other unknown would be the percent of Disney resort guests on the DDP. Of the on property people, what percent is on the plan?

If I get a chance in between the insane amount of laundry that needs to be done I'll see if I can find some real numbers. Its really an interesting topic.
 
the reason buffets are $35 is because enough people pay it. For those getting the dining plan, it seems like a good deal because they can get a "$35" buffet for one credit. But the only reason it is $35 is enough people will pay it. It's like me saying "I'm raising the price of milk to $10 a gallon, but if you join my milk club you can get a gallon every week for only $20 a month." What a bargain. It doesn't matter how much it cost to feed my cow, if I get enough people to pay $10 for a gallon of milk, its worth $10. And I'd rather sell two gallons for $10 each than three gallons for $5 each.

If people stopped going in to crystal palace, for example, that price would come down. That place starts getting empty, the price will come down. But guess what, it isn't going to start being empty. People go in, because they are tired and hungry and see the characters in there and want to experience it and figure "what the heck, I only do this once a year/in a while/in a lifetime" so I might as well go ahead and spend it.

Is it worth it? Probably not. But a lot of folks would rather just pay it than explain the economics of it to their kids- or to themselves for that matter - right then and there.

No, it really isn't "worth" $35, but people pay it.

If I never went to chef mickey's again and watched those birds flying around and heard that music and had to wait in line for that tired food I wouldn't mind one bit. But I'm sure I'll be back as long as the kids are wanting to go.

I read somewhere someone say that the trail's end was no better than going to a golden corral, but cost a lot more. Well, I don't agree exactly. At trails end you can ride a pony and play the playground. I think the food is a little better than at a place like that. For example, I like the chili. But I don't like the chili enough to pay $6 for a bowl of it. There's a tipping point for everything. For a character buffet in the park like CP it is probably a pretty high point.
 
I have paid that much for a non Disney Brunch at the Gaylord Texan so I think $90 isn't too bad

I have eaten brunch at the Gaylord Palms and it makes Disney Buffets look like serving lunch meat vs prime Rib at Gaylord!!!!!!!!!.
 
Biergarten


Lunch - Adult $25.99; Child 3-9 $13.99
Dinner - Adult $34.99; Child 3-9 $16.99




Dinner Buffet Only Add-Ons

Braised Beef Roulades
Sauerbraten (Marinated Pot Roast)
Potato Dumplings with Bread Crumb Butter
Herring Salad Schleswig Holsteiner Style


Ain't worth the difference.
 
Biergarten


Lunch - Adult $25.99; Child 3-9 $13.99
Dinner - Adult $34.99; Child 3-9 $16.99




Dinner Buffet Only Add-Ons

Braised Beef Roulades
Sauerbraten (Marinated Pot Roast)
Potato Dumplings with Bread Crumb Butter
Herring Salad Schleswig Holsteiner Style


Ain't worth the difference.
Maybe not to you, but I pay $25 for a rouladen dinner at German restaurants. Last year I had 5 roulades at Biergarten. Once again, I never made it to the dessert side. Hmmmmmmmmm.
Consider on the dining plan both are 1 credit. Doesn't make much sense, but them's the rules.
 


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer






DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom