And bush is so great with animals:
![]()
So good, in fact, that the real president...Dick, goes on canned hunts..You know where you pen the animal up and kill it.
So good, in fact, that the real president...Dick, goes on canned hunts..You know where you pen the animal up and kill it. It's most fun when you use an animal who has lived it's life in a preserve and it trusts humans...but then again that lawyer fellow trusted humans too...How is HE doing?
This is an interesting article about how "Socks" the cat softened Hillary's image in the White House as First Lady. After the White House years, Socks went to live with Betty Currie, Bill's secretary. Buddy the chocolate lab ran into the road and crossed the Rainbow Bridge. Personally, I never considered "Socks" as relevant in this race. I don't like Hillary for a plethora of reasons that don't involve her cat. Does this matter to some people?
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article2702804.ece
I never got those "animal preserve" hunts. It's cowardly, imho. And I really don't see the sport in it. It's not like they earned the horns they take home. But, that's another debate, as they say.
Its for rich boys that cant be bothered to hunt for real but somehow feel manly shooting animals that are not particularly afraid of humans and easy to find , just hang out next to the area where the caretakers leave the feed , tough one, very primal of them

The cocker spaniel Zeke that they owned in Arkansas was killed in a traffic accident after he got out of the governor's mansion by mistake.I thought the whole Buddy thing was an accident.
Obviously, it DOES matter to you or it would NOT be a thread that you started. You even say it's an 'interesting article.'
My point is post 21 and on...it's no longer about the Clintons, but about how much worse Bush is...The entire thread is ABOUT the Clintons. I have no idea what your point is.
If it didn't matter to you, then why bother posting it?

I can't imagine anybody thinking that article was worth linking to, but it's a good bet Drudge, or some other neo-con tabloid, had in on the first page.![]()
My point is post 21 and on...it's no longer about the Clintons, but about how much worse Bush is...
One thread I got blasted for pointing out to one poster facts about the Clinton administration - it immediately went to "well Bush is worse". No one is allowed to mention anything, no matter how major or how minor about what the Clintons did wrong. They have their own 26%. And if we do, then we are immediately labeled as Bush apologists, that Bush was actually at fault.
Take a look at the thread again - it's no longer about the Clinton's, and it didn't take that long.
The cocker spaniel Zeke that they owned in Arkansas was killed in a traffic accident after he got out of the governor's mansion by mistake.
I think that it should at least be remotely interesting when given the factors that may or may not influence a voter. In all probability, Hillary will be the democratic nominee. I will be very happy to magnify her achilles heel, what ever that may be. I personally don't think it will be her cat however.

Actually, if you read Dawn's post, she thinks that it is ridiculous that someone is commenting on this as relevant to the race.Dawn's Hillary witch hunt has just gone beyond ridiculous.
To get the old Hillary discussion back on page one. Dawn knows what she's doing, but like I said, it usually backfires.
