Hillary Supporters unite....no bashing please! only smiles

Status
Not open for further replies.
Rezko Trial: Obama Consulted on Board Picks
March 10, 2008 1:27 PM



"As an Illinois lawmaker, Barack Obama was one of eight state officials consulted on appointments to a state board which later became involved in what prosecutors describe as a fraud scheme, the Associated Press reports today.

That information was contained in a June 2003 memo from a national Democratic official introduced this morning as evidence at the trial of Antoin "Tony" Rezko, a Chicago-area developer and political operative facing corruption charges......."

http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2008/03/rezko-trial-oba.html

Just sayin....:rolleyes1
 
Rezko Trial: Obama Consulted on Board Picks
March 10, 2008 1:27 PM



"As an Illinois lawmaker, Barack Obama was one of eight state officials consulted on appointments to a state board which later became involved in what prosecutors describe as a fraud scheme, the Associated Press reports today.

That information was contained in a June 2003 memo from a national Democratic official introduced this morning as evidence at the trial of Antoin "Tony" Rezko, a Chicago-area developer and political operative facing corruption charges......."

http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2008/03/rezko-trial-oba.html

Just sayin....:rolleyes1

Interesting. Thanks for the link.
 
That is annoying - because its not playing by the rules. Then again - the rules are - pledged delagates aren't obligated to vote for the candidate they are pledged to.

Would we could get some TX delagates to switch to Hillary - seeing as she won that state!

I heard on the radio - if the dems had a winner take all like the reps did - Hillary would be ahead - or would have won. But we don't. It is what it is.

Part of me thinks - if Hillary had no shot the party would have taken her aside by now. So, to me - she has a legitimate shot to win the nomination - with super delagate support of course. The same as Obama.

I agree and Hillary would have conceded if that was the point. She is to much involved in politics to risk loosing it all by staying in if she were asked by the party to leave. Even the media says it is such a close race that she woould be stupid to drop out. I think if she dooes poorly in PA she will drop out but she is favoresd to win there and to win big.
 
But my point is that my vote doesn't count. The last time a Dem won Texas was what...LBJ? Whether I vote or not won't change who gets the electoral votes from my state.

It might have, if our party had a nominee we could all support wholeheartedly. A nominee that had been able to campaign against McCain instead of spending time and money campaigning against another Dem.

If Obama does win the nomination I have no doubt that McCain's camp have an ad quoting HC and saying "Even his own party thinks he's too inexperienced to lead this country." And if HC is the candidate, McCain's camp will have an ad saying "Even her own party questions her ethics".

McCain isn't going to win by default - he's going to win because our party chose to beat up our own candidates.
I understand your frustration with Texas. It's tiresome to live in such a Conservative area who gave us...Bush. :eek: And he's just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to flaky politicians here.

However I refuse to give up on Texas. Texans have always been a contrary bunch and will sometimes do what you least expect. That is if the native Texans themselves speak up.

I want to add my thanks for your family's sacrifice. What a tough situation. :sad2:
 

Looks like I posted too soon about the mail in vote:

http://www.sptimes.com/2008/03/11/State/Florida_s_vote_by_mai.shtml

Florida's vote-by-mail plan gains few fans

State party officials set to submit it to DNC.

By Adam C. Smith and Wes Allison, Times Staff Writers
Published March 11, 2008


For all the buzz about Florida Democrats gearing up for a statewide mail-in ballot, don't hold your breath.

Interviews with state and national Democratic leaders, as well as officials with the campaigns of Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama make clear that the idea of re-doing the Jan. 29 election using a ballot-by-mail system is not universally popular.

"The Democratic Party is going to run a mail-in election and they're going to police it and they're going to - I mean, I think it's a nightmare," senior Barack Obama strategist David Axelrod said Monday on MSNBC.

Yes, state party staffers are pushing ahead with a $10-million plan that could be submitted to the Democratic National Committee as early as this week. And yes, some high powered Clinton supporters, including strategist James Carville and Govs. Ed Rendell of Pennsylvania and Jon Corzine of New Jersey say they can raise tens of millions of dollars to pay for do-over Democratic primaries in Michigan and Florida.

But the hurdles are immense for pulling off an enormously high stakes election within the next three months:

- Growing skepticism from the Obama campaign and from key supporters of the Illinois senator. They note that Oregon spent 10 years developing and building up to a statewide mail election.

"Does anyone really believe we're going to get this right? And does anyone really want another screwed up election in Florida?," asked Tallahassee City Commissioner Allan Katz, a DNC member and top Obama supporter.

- Divisions among Clinton supporters about whether a new election, mail or otherwise, makes sense. In Florida, Sen. Bill Nelson is touting a vote-by-mail election, while U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz is trashing the idea.

- Little help from the Democratic National Committee's chairman, Howard Dean, in reaching a compromise. Dean has yet to discuss the options with state Democratic chairwoman Karen Thurman.

- No consensus on even basic logistical and legal issues about whether the Democratic election should or must be run by the state. Gov. Charlie Crist says the state must run the election, but most Democratic leaders disagree.

Still, Nelson remains optimistic. His staff has been speaking with lawyers and elections officials in Oregon, which has used mail-in ballots statewide since 1998, and in Florida, including talks with state elections chief Kurt Browning.

The next step is submitting a plan to the DNC, which is expected to happen this week.

"In one week's time, we have gone from people saying 'impossible' to many people saying it's a strong possibility," said Dan McLaughlin, Nelson's spokesman. "We're very optimistic here. Now, what are the chances? I'm not going to put numbers on it. We realize there are so many things that could jump up."

Advocates of voting by mail see upside

The talk of do-over elections comes as the Democratic presidential primary heads toward a stalemate and the prospect that two important states, Florida and Michigan, will have had no voice in picking the nominee. The DNC stripped both states of all their delegates because they moved their primary dates to January, in violation of the national party's schedule.

The elections were held anyway, but with no delegates at stake the results don't count. Clinton won Florida by 17 percentage points, and won 55 percent of the vote in Michigan, where Obama's name was left off the ballot.

Florida's Democratic Party officials have been looking at the vote-by-mail idea for nearly a year as a way to comply with the DNC, but discarded it last year because they could not pay for it. Advocates of a mail-in vote see it as a way of getting Florida's delegates restored while at the same time building a voter contact list that could be a big help in the general election.

"There are a lot of pessimists out there who expect the Florida Democratic Party can't get the job done but in the past couple years we've proved them wrong time and time again," said Democratic Party spokesman Mark Bubriski.

How would voting by mail work?

In votes by mail, voters sign their ballot and the signatures are matched against state registration records. Because Florida maintains a central database of those signatures, it may be possible for the Florida Democratic Party to pay the state elections office to verify the signatures or even process the ballots.

Given the intense media attention on the presidential race and Florida, the party estimates as many as 3-million of roughly 4-million Florida Democrats might participate. With the mailing and counting of ballots handled by an accounting firm, all registered Democrats would receive a ballot with return postage, and the party would open many as 50 regional offices to help voters who may not have received a ballot by mail.

"Because of how advanced our voter file is now we would be able to prevent people from voting more than once," said Bubriski. "We could pull it off, and it certainly wouldn't be a disaster."

State Rep. Keith Fitzgerald of Sarasota, the ranking Democrat on the state House ethics and elections committee, said an accounting firm could ensure the integrity of the election just as they do when corporations have mail-in elections for directors.

"I think some kind of mail ballot is probably the only practical way to pull this off," said Fitgerald, an Obama supporter. "But you're going to have to have buy-in from the DNC, the state party, and both the campaigns. Unless they agree on ground rules, and they're going to have to do it quickly, I don't see anything happening."

Adam C. Smith can be reached at asmith@sptimes.com or (727)893-8241.

[Last modified March 11, 2008, 01:07:28]
 
You guys will appreciate this. I've said elsewhere that my formerly Republican father not only voted for his first Democratic candidate in the Florida primary-he also voted for a woman for the first time. He said he knew his vote probably wouldn't count, but since he was going to vote on the property tax issue, he cast his vote for Hillary while he was there.

Yesterday, a package arrives at my house: a Hillary sign, two buttons and a T-shirt...from Dad. :lmao:
 
Ummm HER mom has one (and thats not my opinion its a fact) but thanks for the advice and for clarifying the rules:rolleyes: I usually don't post, I usually just lurk and Brit posts all the time, so usually I just use her i.d. since she is always signed on, not that I should have to justify why I use it.
Sorry I got the gender of your DD wrong. I'm glad that you have an account and IMO you should use it more often even if it means you have to log out and log back in. It's just nice to know WHO we're talking to: adult or child.

And thanks for the "invite" Robin, but I will go back to the Obama thread now, too much "poop" in this sandbox, :scared:
Nice. Maybe it doesn't matter if you're posting under and adult userID or a child's userID when you post things like that.
 
/
A mail in vote is not a vote. They really need to set something up. Both Hillary's and Obama's campaigns are flush with money. Why can't they spend $10M each and the DNC kick in another $10M?
 
A mail in vote is not a vote. They really need to set something up. Both Hillary's and Obama's campaigns are flush with money. Why can't they spend $10M each and the DNC kick in another $10M?

Why should they? :confused3 Particularly when a caucus could be run for considerably less?
 
Why should they? :confused3 Particularly when a caucus could be run for considerably less?

And seating the delegates for Hillary would cost absolutely nothing. I am glad you agree with that.
 
And seating the delegates for Hillary would cost absolutely nothing. I am glad you agree with that.

So, fairness means either doing it your way, or not at all? :confused3

ETA: And abiding by the rules would also cost nothing.
 
Why should they? :confused3 Particularly when a caucus could be run for considerably less?

Would a caucus be held at a convenient time for working people (which likely would be at night), or a convenient time for older, retired people that don't normally venture out in the evening? Which group of voters should be disenfranchised and not get a fair chance to vote?
 
Would a caucus be held at a convenient time for working people (which likely would be at night), or a convenient time for older, retired people that don't normally venture out in the evening? Which group of voters should be disenfranchised and not get a fair chance to vote?

The days are getting longer, and add in Daylight Savings Time. Early evenings would not be a problem. Believe me, the white belt/white shoe/bermuda shorts crowd arrive at the early bird between 4-6:15 pm on a regular basis...year 'round.
The 6pm arrival folks aren't done with dinner till 7:15 or so.
 
Would a caucus be held at a convenient time for working people (which likely would be at night), or a convenient time for older, retired people that don't normally venture out in the evening? Which group of voters should be disenfranchised and not get a fair chance to vote?

Personally, I think ALL voting (primary, caucus, or general election) should be done on weekends. That gives the most people the opportunity to make it to the polls...and they don't even have to close school to do it. :thumbsup2

Michigan's party plan was always to hold a caucus at some point after the premature primary. It was only later that the Democratic governor decided she didn't want them to do that.

Florida didn't have a plan...but then, it's Florida, so what else would anyone expect? :teeth:
 
Would a caucus be held at a convenient time for working people (which likely would be at night), or a convenient time for older, retired people that don't normally venture out in the evening? Which group of voters should be disenfranchised and not get a fair chance to vote?

Oh for pity's sake. Older, retired people don't run and hide behind the curtains as soon as the sun goes down. If we have a 72 year old running for President, I'm sure that a 72 year old can caucus for one.

Oh and those Texas caucuses everybody hates so much started at 7:15 which yes, would be at night, for all those working people.

Where is it written that voting is supposed to be "convenient" for everyone? Personally I'd find it convenient to vote online.

Waaaah! I want the entire voting system overhauled so I can vote online!
 
What we have here is an Obama supporters' infestation. ;) Seriously folks, you want it all your way because that's the only fair way and can't seem to understand that other people might have different opinions.
 
Nah, I'm just being an ornery Texan tired of hearing non-Texans complain about our process which has worked just fine for 32 years and doesn't need to be changed just because some people are unhappy with the result.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

PixFuture Display Ad Tag












Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE














DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Back
Top