Originally posted by MECH8T7
Aren't you guys kind of suprised that, other than phorsenuf, none of them have posted on our parallel thread?
Yes, I am one of "them", and I am posting on your thread. And I know where Canada is. I grew up in Detroit in the olden days when the two dollars were virtually even. (which tells you that I am very old).
I posted several times on that other thread - quoted facts, figures, and gave links to the programs offered in California where I worked.
I find it quite insulting to be the object of ridicule on this thread just because I am a U.S. American who posted on that thread. Most of you (not all but the vast majority) have have left no question about how stupid you think U.S. Americans are. I don't see how your assessment of our intelligence is any less bigoted than those who assume that Canadians kill baby seals for fun at lunch time.
Anybody know where you can get some similies of happy faces getting their head blown up with a shotgun?
Nice to know that's what you think of us.
Duh - our two countries are QUITE different. Maybe you are having trouble accepting that we are different from you. Why would you assume that we should do everything alike - how is your disapproval of our policies any different than the US posters who don't agree with what you do? What, I got from this thread was a strong sense of superiority on the part of many of the Canadians who posted.
As for the maternity leave thing - the state where I lived and worked (California) has recently added paid family leave. Yes, it's shorter than the Canadian version, but I understand from other posts that Canada did not start out with one year of maternity benefits. California didn't just make it for maternity - it also covers taking care of parents, and when adopting or accepting a foster child (who might not be an infant).
Many of you are younger and may not have had to face the elder care issues yet. Does Canada offer paid leave for that? Perhaps it does and you just didn't mention it because the focus was on maternity leave.
As someone who has watched many, many children grow up, I honestly don't think there is that strong of a correlation between the mother being home the first year and the child's outcome. I've seen totally wretched human beings come from a home where the mother was always home. and I've seen wonderful young adults come out of a single parent home where the mother had to work two jobs.
That statement doesn't mean that I disapprove of mother's staying home with her child. Life is incredibly easier for a new mother if she can take time off to raise her children.
I believe someone on this thread mentioned population replacement concerns. Making life easier for a parent (maternity leave, personal leave, child care, etc) is an excellent way of providing an environment where people decide that they do want to bring children into the world.
Population replacement is really not a concern in the U.S. unless one is some kind of bigot that worries about the racial demographics changing. The U. S. does not currently have to face some of the population demographic problems that other countries do. We are still growing - a lot.
And Canada's social policies must not be that perfect - that poor young woman Totalia (in Canada) posted several times about the poverty she experienced and how she had gone a week without eating because of no food as a child. Providing food for children should be a top priority for any country.