NotUrsula
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2002
- Messages
- 20,067
So, at this time of year there are food drives all over the place, and last night I was shopping and added some things to my cart for donating. In doing so, I followed the "wish list" given to me by OFS, and as I was buying these things, I thought about the "healthy food vs. picky eater" thread that is current here. Most of the things that the pantry was requesting were not the sort of thing that the more health-conscious among us would touch with a 10-ft. pole, and it got me thinking about the ethics of the whole situation.
So, when you buy donations for a food drive, do you buy what the drive wants even if you think it is junk food, or do you buy things that you think that the folks who are getting this food should be eating? Do you take special dietary requirements into account when you buy, such as making it a point to contribute lower-salt canned soups instead of the regular ones? Or do you look at it in terms of bang-for-the-buck, in that you have a limited amount you can afford to contribute, and you want to feed as many mouths as you can for that money, even if the food isn't the most nutritious choice? Do you think about giving what the clients are likely to actually enjoy, or are you thinking that food is food and that those who are up against the wall shouldn't want to be choosy?
I guess that in my own case I kind of split the difference. One of the main factors that I take into account is ease of preparation, because the poorest among us are less likely to have fully-equipped kitchens, so open-heat-and-eat is usually my primary selection criteria. Most of the time when I follow the list I'm more of a bang-for-the-buck kind of contributor, but I do try to at least be a little conscious of flavor and ingredients; for instance, if the cheaper store brand is a salt bomb as compared to the name brand, I try to make the better nutritional choice as long as the price difference isn't more than about 30%.
(As a side note, something else that occurred to me was to wonder why we never seem to have kitchen goods drives along with the food drives. If nothing else, shouldn't we be tossing in a few can openers and saucepans among all that canned food?)
So, when you buy donations for a food drive, do you buy what the drive wants even if you think it is junk food, or do you buy things that you think that the folks who are getting this food should be eating? Do you take special dietary requirements into account when you buy, such as making it a point to contribute lower-salt canned soups instead of the regular ones? Or do you look at it in terms of bang-for-the-buck, in that you have a limited amount you can afford to contribute, and you want to feed as many mouths as you can for that money, even if the food isn't the most nutritious choice? Do you think about giving what the clients are likely to actually enjoy, or are you thinking that food is food and that those who are up against the wall shouldn't want to be choosy?
I guess that in my own case I kind of split the difference. One of the main factors that I take into account is ease of preparation, because the poorest among us are less likely to have fully-equipped kitchens, so open-heat-and-eat is usually my primary selection criteria. Most of the time when I follow the list I'm more of a bang-for-the-buck kind of contributor, but I do try to at least be a little conscious of flavor and ingredients; for instance, if the cheaper store brand is a salt bomb as compared to the name brand, I try to make the better nutritional choice as long as the price difference isn't more than about 30%.
(As a side note, something else that occurred to me was to wonder why we never seem to have kitchen goods drives along with the food drives. If nothing else, shouldn't we be tossing in a few can openers and saucepans among all that canned food?)