Sorsha
<font color=royalblue>People, don't be like the ch
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2007
- Messages
- 3,716
With all due respect, this statement demonstrates a basic lack of understanding of immunology. Vaccines work by triggering a lasting immune response in your body's immune system. They accomplish this because the selected antigen(s) in the vaccine (be they live, attenuated, or dead) allow the immune system to learn how to produce antibodies against the target pathogen. This effect lasts long after the vaccine leaves your body. While it may be true to say that often times live/attenuated vaccines may trigger a stronger, longer lasting, immune response, it's wrong to try and say that vaccines that employ dead antigens offer no lasting effect.
The need for annual influenza vaccines isn't because that our vaccines offer no lasting protection because they're "dead", it's because the flu virus is extremely good at mutating compared with other pathogens.
I respectfully stand corrected then. Thanks for clearing that up.
My point still stands however.
I don't care. With as little a threat as influenza poses to me and mine, with our healthy immune systems, and the relatively small threat to life and limb in the US in general I don't find influenza to be a large enough risk to justify the expense, inconvenience, and/or possible side effects of an unneccesary vaccine every year. Even the CDC reports numbers as small as 5000-ish deaths in the USA, and some 90% of deaths are in adults 65 and older. It just plain doesn't matter to me.
To each his own though.Now, if someone could come up with a vaccine to the bloody stinking 24 hour stomach bug the kids all seem to get at the beginning of every school year, we would be ALL OVER that!!
