kdibattista
<font color=darkorchid>It left an indent the size
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2002
- Messages
- 7,794
Not sure what to think about this: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,192085,00.html
cardaway said:You shouldn't have to be thinking about this right now. It's disgusting how the media puts these names out there without a conviction.
cardaway said:You shouldn't have to be thinking about this right now. It's disgusting how the media puts these names out there without a conviction.
pixiemomma said:Do you feel the idenity of all defendents should be hidden unless they are convicted?
I understand where you are coming from. These boys will probably be labeled rapists for a long time regardless of actual or legal guilt but why stop at those accused of rape.
froglady said:Once someone is indicted, it's public record. They will or will not be "convicted" after a trial. The Grand jury just made a determination that there was enough evidence (which we aren't privy to at this point) to proceed with an arrest, arraignment, and most likely, a trial.
cardaway said:Yes.
I didn't say stop at rape.
va32h said:Indictments are a matter of public record and that shouldn't be changed because the defendants are clean-cut white kids from Duke.

froglady said:Once someone is indicted, it's public record. They will or will not be "convicted" after a trial. The Grand jury just made a determination that there was enough evidence (which we aren't privy to at this point) to proceed with an arrest, arraignment, and most likely, a trial.
cardaway said:All true, but that means her name is on record as well. Let's let that out too, right?
cardaway said:You shouldn't have to be thinking about this right now. It's disgusting how the media puts these names out there without a conviction.
va32h said:I don't know if these players are guilty or not, since I have heard no evidence in the case.
However, just because someone is a stripper does not mean they can't be raped.
Just because someone is drunk, does not mean they can't be raped.
Shows like CSI have promoted the idea that there will always be DNA to conclusively prove guilt. Lack of DNA evidence does not automatically mean innocence.
Indictments are a matter of public record and that shouldn't be changed because the defendants are clean-cut white kids from Duke.
discernment said:Game is over now. The race card has been played.![]()
disneyjunkie said:OH please, let's not pretend race isn't a issue here. Race, class, and politics are all at play here.
discernment said:Oh, I agree. Race has been played from the beginning along with the usual Jesse Jackson involvement. Along with the D.A being up for re-election.
As someone once said, "you can get an indictment on a ham sandwich". It is too easy to get an indictment and therefore I agree that these names should not have been released.