Actually I thought what you said was ridiculous.
And my point is that you were wrong about that. We're
disagreeing.
A moral imperative? That's just a tad dramatic.
Perhaps a little, but it was a matter of drawing the comparison, between the obligations of a host and the obligations of a guest. Your perspective indicates a really draconian guest-bias, as far as I can tell. I wonder if anyone lives the values as absolutely as you profess them, because I think, for a lot of people, it is chic to profess this guest-bias, but when push comes to shove they defer to a guests comfort only to some extent. I speak from personal experience as a vegetarian for whom hosts, perhaps folks who profess such guest-bias as you do, prepare either no vegetarian items for a dinner party, or make patently inconsiderate efforts in that regard. I also speak from second-hand experience as the husband of a woman who once was a smoker, and regularly exiled to the bitter cold to address her chemical addiction, by hosts who would not have their home affected by one or two cigarettes smoked. It is amazing how people try to rationalize saying it is appropriate for hosts to preclude cigarettes that could make drapes smokey, but not appropriate for hosts to preclude shoes that could scratch wood floors
And it goes broader than that... if you're a Christian, and I'm visiting you as your guest for Christmas, do we go to Midnight Mass at your church? or do you find a UU fellowship and have us go there together?
When you visit someone it is
their home you're visiting,
their life you're sharing in, and
their values that prevail. That's the "imperative". The considerations hosts make to defer to the guest's perspective over that of their own) is hospitality, a noble endeavor.
And yes, I think it's rude to ask.
You're entitled to your opinion, of course, but the real message here, that I hope you and those who agree with you are getting, is that reasonable people disagree about this. So since you think it is rude to ask, that means it is rude
for you to ask, but since other people don't think it is rude to ask, that means it is
not rude
for them to ask. You can't judge the actions of others by your personal values; otherwise, I'd have to label you as immoral if you eat animals. (And to be clear: I don't label you as immoral if you eat animals, even though I would label myself as such if I did.)
And yes, I think the host should put their guests' comfort before their own.
The host's comfort is not even remotely part of the issue here. This is a matter of respecting and caring for the host's home.
It would be rude to tromp mud through someone's house. I believe all would agree with that. I don't think that's what were discussing here.
In essence, we are, because the difference between "trumping mud" and anything that causes significant harm to the host's home is just a matter of degree, and in context, just a rationalization for disrespect by the guest.