Chesire said:I hope this isn't too much off topic, but do you have any ideas of how to teach younger children about finances? I think my parents did a great job of teaching me (looking back, years later ...) but I have no idea about how to teach my son.
It amazes me too. And it isn't just in Silicon Valley where folks spend a lot on appearances. I learned long ago that you can't tell anything about a person's financial situation by looking at their house, their clothes or their car because they may be in debt up to their eyeballs to pay for those things.Julia M said:That amazed me.....that they could drive fancy cars, but not have a few thousand dollars in cash available (we live in Silicon Valley, where salaries are high, but people also seem to spend alot on appearances.)
Julia M said:My biggest hope is that I do a good job educating my kids on how to handle money wisely

disneysteve said:Read that OP again. 30% of people earning over $75,000/yr live paycheck to paycheck. 44% of US households have NO savings at all. It boggles the mind.
)disneysteve said:I thought I'd share some data that all came from national financial magazines the past couple of days. Personally, I find these stats alarming.
1. Over the past 10 years, credit card debt among 18- to 24-year-olds has risen by 104%.
2. Only 56% of US households have any type of savings, while 44% have no savings at all.
3. 32% of households headed by someone aged 65 to 74 were carrying home mortgage debt as of 2001, an increase of 26% from just 3 years earlier.
4. Nearly 60% of households in America with children under age 18 and over half of those nearing retirement depend on their latest paycheck to meet expenses. That also includes one third of workers earning $75,000 or more.
Curious, as always, to hear your thoughts.
disneysteve said:Great point. No matter how low the price is, it isn't a bargain if you don't need the thing. You may save $50 by buying it, but you'll save $150 by not buying it.


That sort of scares me.HaleyB said:I am all for personal responsibility, but it is the role of a government to protect the weak from those that would prey on them. In some cases weak means those who do not know better.
Are you a college student? And you turned down the credit? I hope by the time I sent my kids to college, they were smart enough to do the same if they couldn't handle it. My kids DID have credit cards in college, but knew the responsibility was theirs to watch the charging on it. On Payday, I assume that college kids are smart enough to know that they can't go and buy 15 CD's before paying their bills, and they should know if they charged them instead, that simple math will show if they can afford to do this or not. I certainly don't want the government making decisions on who will or won't be eligible for a credit card, and for what amount. I DO think the government should be sure credit cards clearly show what percentage the payback will be, but then who reads the pamplet that comes with the credit cards giving all this info?Free4Life11 said:I believe these companies DO prey on people and I think it's wrong. They give them unsolicited credit line increases, hoping that people will charge more. They give them nice interest rates and then jack them up. Even if they say 14.99% after that, they find SOME way to raise the rate. It may all be legal, but I think it's sneaky and rotten.
I learned long ago that you can't tell anything about a person's financial situation by looking at their house, their clothes or their car because they may be in debt up to their eyeballs to pay for those things.
. Probably because we have been in that situation untill recently, me (28) a SAHM, and DH (39) has a great job but is self employed (pay out of pocket for health care, self employment tax, ect can be very expensive) and after a being totally OK with a purchase that would finance out to $50-$100 per month because we could cover that, all it took was a glitch in being paid (we were not paid for 4 months, we co-own the company and had some major problems with a divorcing spouse) we received a real wake-up. We were not thinking at all about the future (looking back it's really scary) luckily for us that wake up call came early enough and lasted long enough for us to really get the message and turn the situation around. We will still have fun times, budget friendly vacations, and a great life, without the amazing flat screen like our friends have in their living room, and best of all we are bill free except a Mortgage (and of course utilities) and are saving for the important things in life (retirement, weddings, schooling, ect). Thankfully reading posts like this one have helped lead me in the right direction, and give me reasons to keep on chugging down the savings track
Scary thing is that many will not have a real wake up call untill it is to late
time for some4. Nearly 60% of households in America with children under age 18 and over half of those nearing retirement depend on their latest paycheck to meet expenses. That also includes one third of workers earning $75,000 or more.
plus the 20% interest you will pay for the next 20 years of your life while making the minimum payment!DisneySteve,IMO, a credit card company should be legally barred from granting a credit card to an individual with zero income and thus no means to repay any debt acquired. How can you possibly be a good credit risk if you have no money?
)
).

DMRick said:That sort of scares me.
I think part of the blame should lie with the credit card companies/banks. There isn't a day that goes by that I don't get something in the mail offering me another credit card.
Along those same lines, I HATE when I'm checking out and the cashier says to me, "You saved $____ today." I know I should just let it go, but I usually say, "No, actually I spent $______ today."disneysteve said:Great point. No matter how low the price is, it isn't a bargain if you don't need the thing. You may save $50 by buying it, but you'll save $150 by not buying it.
In that case I understand, if she is able to hold a job, but still would not understand buying on credit and paying off, and hope your friend can help her daughter manage her offers. But I don't like the idea of the government deciding who IS capable. What if my IQ wasn't enough to suit them? Is it OK if my IQ is high enough but my salary isn't, or vise versa? Would they decide that all those who live in group homes can't get credit? We have a handicap group home a couple blocks from me, but not all of the residents would not be capable. What if the government decided I was putting too much on my credit cards, and didn't realize I paid them off every month. Who would decide the criteria? Too much government interference scares me. There are plenty of adults who have the same problem with cc's as young people, or mentally disabled people. I wish schools would have a required course in CC management...although so many adults know better and still get themselves in a bind. As far as the cc company's and their risk, and it being passed to me in the form of 23% interest, none of our cards are anywhere near that. But then I keep them paid off, so it wouldn't matter to me. If you have good credit (not you per se, anyone), be sure to call your cc company, if your interest is that high, and ask them to lower it. They often will.crisi said:Why? I have a friend with a mentally disabled adult daughter. The daughter has about third grade skills. She lives in a group home and works at Wendy's where she wipes tables and mops floors (but doesn't work the cash register or cook). She gets approved credit card offers all the time.
Personally, I'd rather have the laws that protect her - and protect me when they take advantage of her - than have her taken advantage of and us stuck with the bill, which is what happens now. If the credit card companies want to give her credit THEY should take the risk - not pass it along to me in the form of 23% interest.