OtherScott
Laugh
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2013
- Messages
- 750
Do the words “heard from a number of guests” and “we’re working on providing” sound like they are reacting, or that they had these changes in their pocket all along?
First, points for working in the Trading Places ref. Pure genius. Second, megapoints for response time. I'm in awe.
Good comedy has a ring of truth to it...great comedy has even more.
And you went from great to good in scenario 1: "there seems to be rather uniform agreement that three FPs per day is not enough and people want more."
Now a good lawyer would remind the jury during close that you made the claim in your opening that Valentine concluded that "there seems to be rather uniform agreement that three FPs per day is not enough and people want more." Then he'd ask them if they had been shown any evidence to support this. He'd do this by standing 2 feet from you while you scribble on a legal pad as your client tries not make eye contact with the jury - while trying not to look like he's trying not to make eye contact.
Then he'd remind the jury that they heard from witness cigar95, who told them firsthand how, in January, he participated in testing of the very options that opposing counsel claims were only the result of surveys conducted in 2 months later. Surveys opposing counsel claims were only drawn up as the result of panic induced from irate customers.
The he'd instruct the jury to take the survey questions with them into the deliberation room. Read them carefully. Are they designed to answer if more FPs should be available, or how?
With every drip of information, this becomes less satisfying.
.