Like many of the others who are thankful for this service, my son has autism. We've been taking him since 2009 to WDW...every year we obtain a GAC and every year we have been decreasing the actual use of the card - he continues to mature (physically and emotionally) and the need is no longer as great. Eventually we hope to discontinue having to use it, but for now, we are so grateful to have that option. It's even more amazing that we don't have to jump through hoops to obtain it - if you only knew what some have to do just to get basic services to help their children live a decent life, you would be shocked. Keep in mind, no one asks for their child to be born with a disability.
To answer those who question whether those people who have disabilities like my son should even attempt WDW, I just want you to understand how invaluable WDW is in helping our kids learn to tolerate the circumstances that may "set them off". It's a simple concept...you can desensitize someone by introducing them to their triggers, very slowly and over periods of time...and the rewards (the attractions) are fantastic motivators! WDW has helped our son to enjoy life, and what he learns there definitely translates into being able to handle his issues better in other locations. It's therapy!
I just loved your whole post, and I'm so glad your son is doing better with every trip.
the bottom line is ....no GAC's should be given out without a doctors note period. That would get rid of alot of abuse right there.
Of course it would, when Disney was shut down by the blatant disregard for the law.
If you want special treatment places, I believe you should have to prove why you can have it.
The system wasn't designed to be SPECIAL treatment, though. It is supposed to help people have a more typical park experience, not a special one.
It's the CMs, IMO, who are allowing it to be more special than it's supposed to be. And they are where the changes should start. Make the GAC "act" like it's supposed to act.
Having a special parking space is *special*, which is why you need a doctor involved to get a placard or license plate. Having somewhere *else* to wait the normal amount of time for a ride isn't *special*. So no doctor's note is needed.
I read a report of a person with HEARTBURN that used a GAC. That is just absurd.
Link please?
I think that the GAC works as a golden FP pass more often than not. If you read TRs of people who use the GAC, they are almost always ushered through the FP line when they show the GAC.
....
I think that what they are doing in CA is a great idea. I understand that people have issues that make it difficult to be in crowds or to stand for extended periods of time, but that doesn't mean they should get on the attraction immediately. Being able to wait away from the crowds either in a dedicated GAC lounge or out in the park somewhere would work fine.
That article *vaguely* mentioned that some CMs, at some undefined time in RSR's life, were giving times to come back. It also said that they issued GACs. That's two separate, different, things being done at the same ride. So they aren't doing any ONE thing at all. The article was pretty bad, IMO.
And I disagree that the GAC works like a "golden ticket" more often than not. We're seeing a very distinct subset, by reading trip reports.
Looking at the comments below that article, WDW doesn't need a letter like that to know if this person really has an illness?
No. Different countries, different laws.
Well, they THINK they see abuse. They have no way to know.
Exactly.
I don't post often but saw this and had to comment only because of an experience earlier this month when my sister and I were visiting MK.
As we were leaving a man was rolling out in a wheel chair ~ he stepped out of it at the exit gates and a CM directed him to the return area but he just kept walking out of the exit, with absolutely no obvious problem to the extent that he decided to skip away and jumped over something in front of him.
That's an abuse of the system. I thought people now had to have a prescription of some kind in order to be issued a GAC.
So then you followed him and interviewed him thoroughly where he confessed that he was indeed abusing the privilege?
Or maybe that was one little part of his day, and right then he didn't need the wheelchair, but maybe earlier he did.
That's what I'm saying; there's just no way, other than interviewing everyone you see, to KNOW what's going on. That's why the article is so bad; all he does is say that some CMs say there's abuse. There's no proof at all. And all anyone of us can give is anecdotal evidence. MY anecdotal evidence is from
Disneyland, accompanying a friend of mine, and being sent through a door that LOOKED like it was going to put us right onto Buzz, but in fact we had to wait more time than it would have taken to get through the rest of the line. I'm 100% sure that people thought we were getting right on, but we were not. And I've talked with others who have experienced the expected wait with a GAC *most* of the time, and who occasionally got that extra near-FOTL experience.