Sorry, I'll try to stay on topic.
Personally, I blame the DDP as well as a bunch of this other stuff on a management philosophy I don't think is good for my relationship with Disney (I was going to say "bad management" but really, on a business level, its only bad if it means less profit - and if they can replace me at a margin profit of say $100 with five people that all have a marginal profit of $22 - they do better in the end). I think the DDP as well as a lot of the other cutbacks are symptoms of Disney going for a mass market volume operation. Mass market volume operations are not good at "magic" and need to standardize and reduce waste to stay profitable. But they can cut their margins and increase profits because a smaller margin over bigger volume still means more profit.
(Now, to me, none of this makes sense. They had capacity issues already in both the restaurants and the resorts pre DDP, so they can't increase their volume by any huge multiplier - but they do have to keep growing to survive as a business - so there are obviously peices I'm missing - Disney isn't run by idiots who can't do capacity calculations and don't understand pricing being driven by demand. However, they are a big company - and that can mean making decisions independantly that end up having dependant consequences - which is one of the things I suspect is happening).
Moreover, I don't see that it clearly drains resources in the same department. I don't know that Leaping Horse reports profitability through Dining or if it reports through BW and into Resorts. If the organization is that Leaping Horse reports through BW, than I fail to see where this has much to do with the DDP at all.
Personally, I blame the DDP as well as a bunch of this other stuff on a management philosophy I don't think is good for my relationship with Disney (I was going to say "bad management" but really, on a business level, its only bad if it means less profit - and if they can replace me at a margin profit of say $100 with five people that all have a marginal profit of $22 - they do better in the end). I think the DDP as well as a lot of the other cutbacks are symptoms of Disney going for a mass market volume operation. Mass market volume operations are not good at "magic" and need to standardize and reduce waste to stay profitable. But they can cut their margins and increase profits because a smaller margin over bigger volume still means more profit.
(Now, to me, none of this makes sense. They had capacity issues already in both the restaurants and the resorts pre DDP, so they can't increase their volume by any huge multiplier - but they do have to keep growing to survive as a business - so there are obviously peices I'm missing - Disney isn't run by idiots who can't do capacity calculations and don't understand pricing being driven by demand. However, they are a big company - and that can mean making decisions independantly that end up having dependant consequences - which is one of the things I suspect is happening).
Moreover, I don't see that it clearly drains resources in the same department. I don't know that Leaping Horse reports profitability through Dining or if it reports through BW and into Resorts. If the organization is that Leaping Horse reports through BW, than I fail to see where this has much to do with the DDP at all.