DAS changes coming WDW May 20/ DL June 18, 2024

Your math is failing to account for ratios such as 4:1 or 10:1 for LL entrance and how that affects timing.
The ratio is determined based on the number of guests expected in each queue -- LL vs standby. Those ratios may well be adjusting now that WDW has a better handle on the number of guests who will enter the LL in an hour. The ratio does NOT directly drive the standby wait time; the number of people in each queue drives the ratio.

Standby wait times used to be calculated by handing a guest a lanyard as they entered the standby queue and the guest returned that lanyard when exiting the attraction. Simple calculation of how long a guest was in the queue+attraction. Other than the fact standby had to halt periodically to allow the LL (FP) to move through, the LL (FP) was not used to calculate the standby wait. It's still that simple though lanyards are no longer used.
 
Wait times are not only based on how many people enter each queue (LL, SB). Disney controls the capacity of several rides by adjusting the number of vehicles/boats operating, etc. Depending on how many boats they have running, we could see an hour wait for Jungle Cruise on a slow day or a busy day.
 
Your math is failing to account for ratios such as 4:1 or 10:1 for LL entrance and how that affects timing. That is why I included the ratio piece in my calculation. Less people in LL but the same ratio of LL:Standby = exponentially faster throughput of LL. You can't calculate it as x number of people have now moved from LL to Standby. You must insert timing ratios into your equation. A 4:1 or even 10:1 ratio (x:y) where x has decreased by 40% and transferred to y does not increase y by 40%, neither does it cause y to remain stable.

This is why it was said that standby will speed up and wait times decrease if LL users decline. (ie: touring plans predicted math).

This is why the observed result draws us to conclude that DAS users did not make up 80% - or even 40% of LL users.
Of course the increase and decrease percentages aren't going to be equal.
This is all vastly more complex because those people who moved through faster go somewhere. Rather than spending 60 minutes in line A, They might spend 45 minutes in line A, then they go to line B, causing line B to increase sooner. At the same time, the family who used to get a return for the LL to ride A, eat lunch, then go through the LL while grabbing a return for ride B might be in that 45 minute Line A, then go to lunch, then join line B.
There are many factors going on, but we already definitively know that increasing the LL entry rate does increase standby waits, and decreasing the LL entry rate will decrease standby waits. The number of users obtaining DAS is inconsistent even across years in the same time frame, so having a single month of comparison is essentially meaningless.

I know that our April/May trip this year made a DAS ration of 80% completely believable, as we were watching blue lights non-stop as we toured the parks with our paid G+. When we did standby, we also stood and watched what seemed like endless streaming by of LL users while we were at a complete standstill for at times up to 5 minutes. There is no point in arguing over whether DAS was getting to be too much, when you have a disability system MOST of the people in the park have a legitimate reason to utilize, it is too many people with special access. It needs to be tightened to people who NEED it, not those who find it convenient. The initial weeding process is going to suck until it gets straightened out.
 
Your math is failing to account for ratios such as 4:1 or 10:1 for LL entrance and how that affects timing. That is why I included the ratio piece in my calculation. Less people in LL but the same ratio of LL:Standby = exponentially faster throughput of LL. You can't calculate it as x number of people have now moved from LL to Standby. You must insert timing ratios into your equation. A 4:1 or even 10:1 ratio (x:y) where x has decreased by 40% and transferred to y does not increase y by 40%, neither does it cause y to remain stable.

This is why it was said that standby will speed up and wait times decrease if LL users decline. (ie: touring plans predicted math).

This is why the observed result draws us to conclude that DAS users did not make up 80% - or even 40% of LL users.
Your math is very impressive but I see it in simpler terms. What matters is attraction capacity. The ratio of people from LL and standby does not increase or decrease ride capacity, it just determines the number of guests boarding from each group per hour, If the number of people in standby remains the same pre and post DAS changes, then yes standby wait times should decrease. DAS changes will decrease the number of people in LL. Where did those people go? Did they all go to standby? Probably not 100%, but most did. They have to be somewhere if they are at WDW, and I don't see people paying for a park ticket just to shop and eat. It is reasonable to assume that the number of people in the standby line is higher now due to DAS changes. More people in standby at any one time but more standby guests moving through in an hour equals about the same standby wait times. The only reason for a decrease is due to those that would ride with DAS through LL but chose to not do standby.
 

Your math is very impressive but I see it in simpler terms. What matters is attraction capacity. The ratio of people from LL and standby does not increase or decrease ride capacity, it just determines the number of guests boarding from each group per hour, If the number of people in standby remains the same pre and post DAS changes, then yes standby wait times should decrease. DAS changes will decrease the number of people in LL. Where did those people go? Did they all go to standby? Probably not 100%, but most did. They have to be somewhere if they are at WDW, and I don't see people paying for a park ticket just to shop and eat. It is reasonable to assume that the number of people in the standby line is higher now due to DAS changes. More people in standby at any one time but more standby guests moving through in an hour equals about the same standby wait times. The only reason for a decrease is due to those that would ride with DAS through LL but chose to not do standby.
The human variance on this really makes it complicated. You also have DAS users who might have gone on something (especially long wait rides) multiple times with DAS, but would only for example do SDD or Pirates once without DAS vs 2-3 times with it. They might not replace rides with shopping all the time, but those shopping breaks, bathrooms breaks, food breaks, now all come between rides vs "during the line".
 
Exactly our experience as well. Everyone saying that DAS users were 80% of the LL, and I was like "What?? We never see anyone else around us in line who is a DAS user."

Now we see that drastically reducing DAS users had zero affect on wait times, it's pretty clear the percentages being thrown around were not accurate.
We go to WDW twice a year for 2 week plus trips and seldom see any other DAS parties scan in
I know that our April/May trip this year made a DAS ration of 80% completely believable, as we were watching blue lights non-stop as we toured the parks with our paid G+. When we did standby, we also stood and watched what seemed like endless streaming by of LL users while we were at a complete standstill for at times up to 5 minutes. There is no point in arguing over whether DAS was getting to be too much, when you have a disability system MOST of the people in the park have a legitimate reason to utilize, it is too many people with special access. It needs to be tightened to people who NEED it, not those who find it convenient. The initial weeding process is going to suck until it gets straightened out.
We were also at WDW April/May this year and seldom saw anyone else scan in with the Mickey head turn blue. Turning blue is not specific to DAS. It's just an alert for the CM that they to check the screen to see what the alert it. For DAS, it's to check that the photo of the DAS registered person on the screen matches the person entering the attraction.
One occasion that we saw, the alert was that the group was early for their Genie+. Another, they scanned in to the wrong attraction.
My experience does not support the 80% estimate or even close. I do agree with your last point though. A large number of people were getting DAS for 'just in case' , specific diagnosis or convenience and it's now being trimmed back to NEED.
Your math is failing to account for ratios such as 4:1 or 10:1 for LL entrance and how that affects timing. That is why I included the ratio piece in my calculation. Less people in LL but the same ratio of LL:Standby = exponentially faster throughput of LL. You can't calculate it as x number of people have now moved from LL to Standby. You must insert timing ratios into your equation. A 4:1 or even 10:1 ratio (x:y) where x has decreased by 40% and transferred to y does not increase y by 40%, neither does it cause y to remain stable.

This is why it was said that standby will speed up and wait times decrease if LL users decline. (ie: touring plans predicted math).

This is why the observed result draws us to conclude that DAS users did not make up 80% - or even 40% of LL users.
CM have posted in various places that the ratio is not the same for each attraction and even within an attraction, it varies based on conditions at the time.
Wait times are not only based on how many people enter each queue (LL, SB). Disney controls the capacity of several rides by adjusting the number of vehicles/boats operating, etc. Depending on how many boats they have running, we could see an hour wait for Jungle Cruise on a slow day or a busy day.
This is a very important variable - number of boats, number of vehicles, number of theaters/rooms running can make a big difference.
I posted this about 150 pages back regarding the touring plans claims about observations.

There has been a lot of discussion on this thread, with a lot of people accepting everything he has written as 'Proof'. I am pointing out some things here and don't think this 'proof' should be discussed here anymore.
ONLY DISNEY KNOWS THE ACTUAL NUMBER, anything else is a guess.


He had people watching everyone who entered a particular attraction at a particular 1 hour time of day on 9/13/2023. His people were just counting numbers entering the Standby and LL entrance. Those may or may not reflect what goes on other times, especially for guests using DAS.

He's making a lot of assumptions to come up with his figures. His assumptions included:
  • Observations made reflected what would be seen other times of day (his observations were made between 5 and 9pm).
  • That his observations were correct (for example, Haunted Mansion between 5 and 6pm, they reported counting 710 entering the Standby line and 923 in the LL).
  • The small number of guests on VIP tours during the observation times reflected VIP tour use. I've personally seen 2 or 3 groups of VIP tours getting on an attraction during the few minutes I'm getting on an attraction during the day on some days. I personally would expect more VIP tours during the day and fewer in the evening.
  • attractions have a maximum capacity of 300 per hour for Genie+ allocation, which is a static number. He admits that number should be taken with a grain of salt. He/we don't know whether ALL attractions have the same Genie+ allocation per hour AND/OR whether the allocation per hour is the same for all hours of the day.
  • Genie+ has a 1 hour return time, so the guest using LL during his count included only the 300 Genie+ allocated for that hour. Guests frequently post that they were able to use Genie+ 5 minutes before and 15 minutes after their 1 hour window. The 'unknowable' part is how many in his count included people using that 'expanded window'
  • There is no way to count Rider Swap (which he conceded) or people using LL with Guest Recovery Passes (for example, if Space Mountain had been down for a while, guests who had Genie+ while the ride was down might have gotten a Guest Recovery Pass allowing entry into another attraction).
He's extrapolating all that to come up with his numbers. A few numbers/assumptions being different would make a big difference in the end result.
Some other confounding factors include:
  • guests with a DAS Return Time have a beginning time to use it, but it can be used any time after that until the attraction or park closes. So, people using DAS during the one hour observation period could have received that Return Time many hours before.
  • guests with disabilities don't use all attractions equally. Many have disabilities that make attractions like Space Mountain or 7 Dwarfs inappropriate for them.
 
We were also at WDW April/May this year and seldom saw anyone else scan in with the Mickey head turn blue. Turning blue is not specific to DAS. It's just an alert for the CM that they to check the screen to see what the alert it. For DAS, it's to check that the photo of the DAS registered person on the screen matches the person entering the attraction.
One occasion that we saw, the alert was that the group was early for their Genie+. Another, they scanned in to the wrong attraction.
My experience does not support the 80% estimate or even close. I do agree with your last point though. A large number of people were getting DAS for 'just in case' , specific diagnosis or convenience and it's now being trimmed back to NEED.
I don't even read whatever blogger everyone talks about doing some random sample but agree their system is senseless. It's interesting that our experiences are totally different, and I get that blue does not ALWAYS mean DAS, but when you're walking up to the little scanner, and watch multiple groups in a row re-organize, person #1 scans, gets blue, then looks up at the CM while the group waits, nobody says anything and then it's green and the group scans in... It's a safe guess that at least many of those groups are DAS users. What we watched on our last trip was awkward and unlike anything we've seen on past trips.

My comments about it being believable also come from common sense- obviously it wouldn't the same across all rides or all times of day, but the fact that it had become common, and even encouraged, to ask for DAS when a child had ADD, vision or hearing loss, learning disabilities, etc. is a factor. Not that some of these aren't legitimate causes of need, but they are relatively common issues. ADHD alone is over 11% of children. Basic population analysis tells us to have a "special system" that upwards of 30% of the population qualify for and can bring their whole family along would result in the ratio of DAS to paid LL that is going to be higher than ideal, unless we want to believe that something like 50-80% of total parkgoers were paying for Genie+ to bring that ratio down. At this point it would be common sense, rather than a wild imagination, that would tell us they were issuing a large number of passes.
 
Where are you accounting for the guests who now must enter the standby instead of LL? For the most part they don't just disappear, they are now added to the standby queue. They weren't really in standby previously, unless you are claiming the often inflated standby wait was to account for DAS parties.

And therein lies a different issue -- that standby waits aren't all that accurate anyway so maybe WDW has continued to leave them inflated...?

But they now must adapt meals and breaks around riding, so they aren't in as many standby lines as they would have been able to be in LLs...so you will get reductions, even if they never rode while waiting for a DAS ride...
 
There are multiple places to find the exact data for wait times, so it's not really anecdotal. Wait times have not decreased since the DAS system changed.
You are conflating total wait times with LL waits, I am not making a claim about standby waits. Almost everyone who has been in a park in the past few weeks (including me) have noted that LL waits are significantly shorter overall and fewer occasions where the LL is over 20 minutes. This is a big win for the DAS users who previously had to leave lines when LLs were too long.
 
You are conflating total wait times with LL waits, I am not making a claim about standby waits. Almost everyone who has been in a park in the past few weeks (including me) have noted that LL waits are significantly shorter overall and fewer occasions where the LL is over 20 minutes. This is a big win for the DAS users who previously had to leave lines when LLs were too long.
This.

My hope is that we shall see this realized here at DLR too and that progress not reversed with FP+ Resurrected.

We don't know if my son will get DAS renewed being adult with mod/sev ASD.

But we Do have the means for LL purchases if the LL lines are permissible. That has been a major obstacle for several rides at DLR and he hasn't ridden on despite going on off season and midweek.
 
I’ve had the opposite experience it seems many others have reported. I have an AP to WDW and very often when I go to the parks at busy times I will see one or more groups scanning in with DAS when I get to an attraction. I also hear people talking about DAS around me in general quite a bit.

As someone pointed out earlier, yes blue can mean more than DAS, but there are clear indicators when it is DAS.
 
I have been going about 2 times a year, and used DAS up until now - mostly with one othe person, very occasionally a couple more in my party. And my experience has been similar to what others have described - I have never seen any other blue Mickey's at scan in points at all - regardless of whether they are DAS, VIP, wrong time scan in, or other reasons (other than children who can't quite get it the first try)... I also am a chatty kind of person, and have never even talked with anyone else that uses it at the parks. Maybe I go at down times, or am not very observant. 🤷‍♀️
 
I don't even read whatever blogger everyone talks about doing some random sample but agree their system is senseless. It's interesting that our experiences are totally different, and I get that blue does not ALWAYS mean DAS, but when you're walking up to the little scanner, and watch multiple groups in a row re-organize, person #1 scans, gets blue, then looks up at the CM while the group waits, nobody says anything and then it's green and the group scans in... It's a safe guess that at least many of those groups are DAS users. What we watched on our last trip was awkward and unlike anything we've seen on past trips.
it probably depends a lot on time of day, attraction, day, exact date etc. That probably made a difference in what you saw compared to what we saw.
I agree there was a very large amount of use and overuse that needed to be dealt with. I just don't think it approaches 80% like some people claim.

A lot of things in social media give evidence to DAS having been given out for wants, not needs. That's the big change
 
It's easy for people's perceptions to be biased towards what they personally saw - or didn't see. Saying you all saw blue lights or didn't see any only speaks to personal instances. When I went last - I saw absolutely no blue lights, though that a while back.

From all the information, I don't think it was 80% percent that people have been throwing around. But I think it was large enough to interfere with future systems like this new pre selection version of Lightning Lanes, and that is why they cut back to those who they deem 'need it.' Simple as that really.
 
The optics aren’t great for the new DAS criteria. Before the changes it was hotly debated what if any impacts DAS had at all. If that were true, would it make any sense for WDW to open themselves to scrutiny for nothing.

The worse it looks the more reason they’d need to bother. The need to make changes had to outweigh the negative perceptions and headlines we see right now around the changes.

It’s a big risk - a decision I don’t think WDW took lightly. What was happening that made them feel this was their best option? How could they defend such a decision? Show previous impact on park operations and other guests? Show accommodations still meet legal requirements?
 
You are conflating total wait times with LL waits, I am not making a claim about standby waits. Almost everyone who has been in a park in the past few weeks (including me) have noted that LL waits are significantly shorter overall and fewer occasions where the LL is over 20 minutes. This is a big win for the DAS users who previously had to leave lines when LLs were too long.
Nope - there are multiple spots that track the wait time for LL so it's easy to find that data apart from standby. LL has remained the same as this time last year.
 
What sites track LL waits accurately? I’ve never come across one.
There are a few that try to track LL waits, but none of them do it very accurately. They generally rely on self-reported data, sometimes supplemented by their staff doing some sampling. For individual waits it's not particularly useful because crowdsourced data with relatively few datapoints is unreliable by nature (I've tested myself to see how close they were to my actual waits and it varied pretty significantly), but it could theoretically be useful for tracking trends on a larger scale I guess.
 
Nope - there are multiple spots that track the wait time for LL so it's easy to find that data apart from standby. LL has remained the same as this time last year.
I don't even know how a third party could reasonably and consistently track lightning lane wait times, as there is no official measure provided by Disney and it would therefore have to rely on highly anecdotal user reports. Standby at least has Disney's reported information and even if a site is using additional user submitted information, they project based on the official time combined with consistent patterns of over- or under-estimating.
 












Save Up to 30% on Rooms at Walt Disney World!

Save up to 30% on rooms at select Disney Resorts Collection hotels when you stay 5 consecutive nights or longer in late summer and early fall. Plus, enjoy other savings for shorter stays.This offer is valid for stays most nights from August 1 to October 11, 2025.
CLICK HERE













DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest

Back
Top