Mackenzie Click-Mickelson
Chugging along the path of life
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2015
- Messages
- 29,755
I'm not ignoring yours nor the other poster's comments or points because we've already discussed this before in this vastness of this thread so please don't think I am. I'm honing in on someone who may be upset but is using that to speak about Disney's motive. That poster may be coming at it from having just cancelled their trip because of their personal situation and feelings towards what options they had (though they did at least mention ecv and wheelchair even if that may not be the primary need for them to tour the parks).There's a significant portion of DAS users being offered other accommodations that can be best defined as a group 'medically fragile' - (eg: DM1 and array of GI oriented (including IBD/IBS), POTS) that concurrently may be physically impaired requiring usage of an ECV too now that DAS is not an available accommodation to them.
These are ones newly added to queues with mobility devices that are not accustomed and have more than an external ailment to which mobility devices themselves alleviate and do not need an urgent exiting of the queue unlike above mentioned group. It becomes a logistical and potentially medical issue while trying to exit the queue urgently whereas an only physical ailment-ECV bound will not have such urgent timing issues.
This is the primary consternation of most former DAS users entering other accommodations. Many queues are difficult to navigate backwards to exit with ECV. Enter an internal medical issue - like driving impaired down a narrow alleyway at speed with people on the sides -- not a good situation for many stakeholders.
While we may all have differing opinions on what Disney's motive is sometimes people can become too generic or too general in their comments and saying physically disabled guests are being kicked out to sell more LL is too generic and too general and inaccurate. There have been physically handicap guests using mobility devices in the standby for years, that is irrefutable. It might be a case of forgetting guests who did not use Disney's service for a person who has been well used to Disney's service; basically a perspective skewed.