LuvinTheWorld
Earning My Ears
- Joined
- May 18, 2023
- Messages
- 56
Well of course, they're going to sell these extra DAS spots as G+ and LL.
Well of course, they're going to sell these extra DAS spots as G+ and LL.
Disney has never previously tried to give a disability hierarchy where they say one is more deserving of accommodation than another. When they eliminated the GAC, they reduced the accommodation for everyone equally, and the new offering, DAS, was the same for everyone. This new situation is not remotely analogous to that.
I apologize if I missed this in all the posts from earlier today, but how often have you or a family member used DAS in the past?
If leaving the line works, why would a DAS be needed?
Yeah I really want to know how the heck they’re going to handle certain disorders that can get triggered in queues that don’t fall under this system. This genuinely feels like a problem waiting to happenWait until they start denying kids with serious T1D and approving kids with ADHD. Things should get interesting.
I don’t see how it could impact standby wait times (other than large amounts of people staying home or choosing to ride less rides if their preferred accommodation is no longer available—frankly, I am someone who appears will no longer qualify based on physical disability and our family will likely spend less time in the parks, more at resort pools, and also do fewer riders when we are at the parks…so I guess that’s some capacity that will open up for standby and I’m disproving my own assumption here)—but it will absolutely decrease the LL return times for DAS and Genie+ unless Disney is planning to sell extra LLs for each DAS holder (and their guests) who no longer qualify—and I don’t think it’s Disney’s plan, though I wouldn’t bet my life on it.Yes, I have read statements on other pages/sources that people do think this will impact standby and LL wait times.
Of course the DAS is superior, I’ve never said otherwise. But just because someone wants the superior accommodation doesn’t mean that they need the superior accommodation.There IS a hierarchy. One accommodation is FAR superior to the other. You seem to be the only one who doesn't think so.
I notice you keep referring to preferences and wants but what about needs? The accommodations can only be reasonable if they are actually able to assist the guest, and that decision needs to look at the guest’s needs - not their diagnosis.You keep saying that there is a hierarchy of who deserves accommodation, which is simply untrue. They’re still offering accommodations, just not the one you prefer.
Not to mention that exiting and reentry would need to accommodate scooters/ECVs and wheelchairs- and accommodate devices passing etched other as well as not ibterfering with people creating "bubbles" of space in lines are, consident space isBut you literally cannot leave 90% of lines at the drop of a hat because of the way the lines are designed. It's nearly impossible in the current state. And before someone comes in with "well what if they open up emergency exits" That doesn't exist in a functional way on all rides, particular on the West Coast.
That wouldn't work too well for many individuals, such as myself, who areIf it were me (and I'm with your DD), I would just ask for the "leave the line" pass at the start of every queue. While she'll need to wait solo until you get to the front of the line, it will probably allow her to safely ride the rides with you.
PS - I wonder if that is the plan for many physical issues for adults. They will individually get that type of pass and get to go through the exit of rides when the planned stand by time has elapsed (which should be roughly when their group would get to the front). It makes for a more lonely trip, but one where "maybe" and physical situations are accommodated, while discouraging abuse.
It often takes 1.5 years or more to accurately diagnose an individual with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Of course, now that you have a diagnosis, what does it mean for your particular body. FOP can and does affect any part of your body. In some cases. there may be negligible effects on mobility. In other people, it can be much more progressed.If you go to the doctor with a problem, they will give you a diagnosis (or a likely diagnosis/referral to a specialist if it's complicated) If the problem someone has was never bad enough to go to a Dr for, then it may not be bad enough to qualify for a program meant for disabilities...
Not me, but my daughter - 600 in the world now. She was diagnosed when there were about 70 in the world.Yeah and this is unfortunately a real concern for me. (As well? I’m sorry I haven’t seen if your in the same lump of category of rare conditions. Feel free to correct me). I have a condition that around 50 people have. In the entire world. It’s comorbid to more common conditions that still fall under that classification that I also have the diagnosis for. But if I was at the start of my medical journey and I had the rare diagnosis but not the common ones this has a high chance of causing problems. Fortunately I have both the rare diagnosis along with the more common ones and can retain the DAS
But someone else who has this same condition as rare as it is who might be at the start of their journey could have so many problems. Diagnosis take time.
Yes you do. You keep saying it isn't a disability hierarchy. It is.Of course the DAS is superior, I’ve never said otherwise. But just because someone wants the superior accommodation doesn’t mean that they need the superior accommodation.
Because when leaving the line is an accommodation, demanding the DAS is a preference, not a need.I notice you keep referring to preferences and wants but what about needs? The accommodations can only be reasonable if they are actually able to assist the guest, and that decision needs to look at the guest’s needs - not their diagnosis.
If it is true that not everyone with condition X needs accommodation Y, then how is it helpful for Disney to list a condition as being eligible and other conditions as not being eligible?
Believe what you like.Yes you do. You keep saying it isn't a disability hierarchy. It is.
I mean sure it happens if you’re lucky. I was walking around with Classic Hashimotos for 2 1/2 years and had doctors ignoring the symptoms and the test results adding up before I finally got a diagnosis in March.If you go to the doctor with a problem, they will give you a diagnosis (or a likely diagnosis/referral to a specialist if it's complicated) If the problem someone has was never bad enough to go to a Dr for, then it may not be bad enough to qualify for a program meant for disabilities...
She’s lucky my family member has Crohn’s and DAS is a lifesaver! Without it, there will be issues for my family member so we will wait and see.My sister uses it for Chron’s when she’s having a flare, and she’s happy with this change. She always felt the DAS was overkill for her, but it was the only option available.
Because when leaving the line is an accommodation, demanding the DAS is a preference, not a need.
I agree 100% that they should have had all of the info available before the unveiling.I think we still need to see more on how the return to queue accommodation works before we can declare it is a reasonable accommodation.
Personally, I think Disney should have had all of the information on how these changes will work before they announced them. It has created a lot of added anxiety and worry.
But leaving the line would not be a sufficient accommodation for everyone who falls outside of the ‘autism or similar’ category. It may be for some, but not everyone. If my UC is mild and my T1D well controlled, it would absolutely be sufficient for me.Because when leaving the line is an accommodation, demanding the DAS is a preference, not a need.
I definitely agree though I kinda wonder if someone released it as a means of gauging ahead of time if they need to make alterations to what they have planned. Which isn’t the best in terms of everything but I would rather have them realize that they need to maybe rethink something. Then have it dropped on us without notice and thus without seeing the actual impact ahead of time.I think we still need to see more on how the return to queue accommodation works before we can declare it is a reasonable accommodation.
Personally, I think Disney should have had all of the information on how these changes will work before they announced them. It has created a lot of added anxiety and worry.
So what do you do if you’re in the LL and these things happen?But leaving the line would not be a sufficient accommodation for everyone who falls outside of the ‘autism or similar’ category. It may be for some, but not everyone. If my UC is mild and my T1D well controlled, it would absolutely be sufficient for me.
If I am in the midst of a severe UC flare with poorly controlled blood glucose (which for me is inevitable in the Florida heat coming from the UK), it is not reasonable and trying to leave could cause me harm. This is actually something my doctor specified when applying for a similar system in the UK which actually required medical evidence.