TheMaxRebo
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2008
- Messages
- 27,672
And I understand that but, and I want to use this word loosely because it’s going to seem like an attack but I don’t mean it that way, it’s kind of selfish.
1, as I stated above, the theatrical experience provides jobs to a lot of people, and a lot of younger people, a lot of which is needed to put them through college.
2. These movies are available at home 90 days after they’re in theater, so it’s not like theatrical is exclusive. Where we’re heading, streaming is looking to become exclusive.
3. These directors are making these movies to be seen in theaters, not at home. Same with some actors, though actors will take jobs no matter where their film is screened. But we’re going to see the end of film as an art and begin to see film as a media conveyor belt. More SharkNado, less Ford v. Ferrari.
In the end, we may see more movies, but of far less quality, and far less jobs being given out
but wouldn't the job just shift? not like media isn't being made, just more designed for streaming. I am sure productions like Mandalorian or Game of Thrones employ tons of people as well .... if anything people are consuming more media in total not less. And a lot of that streaming quality is increasing improving as well
I also think the theater experience will live on for a long time - at least for th big movies that benefit most from being seen in a theater. Just might be fewer theaters in total but what are left are designed for those time of "epic" movies
(though, perhaps not my place to comment - both of your examples of movies (both good and bad) are ones I have not seen)