I am on both sides, have a child where my ex doesn't pay anything in as "court ordered" support. He does however pay half on things like surgery, dentist, extras, book fees, etc. Visitation is very laid back to, we do an every other week thing and get along and my dd is VERY well adjusted and has an awesome relationship w/ both of us, never feeling like she has to choose sides.
My dh, has 2 children from another marriage. Pays support to them, also a higher amount than he should. If we weren't together, dh wouldn't be able to afford to live. I think that's why some people have an objection to the support amounts. Sometimes they are set at amounts that if the non custodial didn't have that 2nd income, they wouldn't even be able to live.
Dh is more than willing to help his children out financially where he is ABLE to beyond the date the court ordered support ends. However, he wants to help THEM, not pay the money directly to her because she doesn't use the money for the children. I think that's where alot of the support paying parents aren't understood. It's not the child the don't want to support, many will continue to help their children out where they can after they are adults, but do not want to continue paying for their ex's lifestyle. Also, after age 18, it should be each parent's choice, not the courts because if the two parents were still together, then it would be their CHOICE whether to continue paying for their child not a courts choice.
My parents are still married. When I was 18, I was on my own. I could still live under their roof, food, etc. But for anything "extra", I had to pay my own way, including college. My parents had 5 of us, they couldn't afford college for each of them. I don't resent it at all or feel like I was ENTITLED to have my school paid for. Where I went and studied and got good grades because I knew I was paying for them, I had friends whose parents footed the bill and partied and ended up dropping out. so see~it can go either way.
And one more note. Those that like to complain about the support paying parents and what they should and shouldnt be doing. Walk in their shoes. I do CASA work and advocate for this stuff. In over 80% of cases I have seen, the custodial parent (usually the mother) has created such a break down in the relationship of the father and is out for money vs the well being of the child. When the court is brought in, more often than not, the CASA and the psychologist brought in make recommendations for the father to have the child because they are out for the well being of the child instead of the financial gain.
And most mothers who are required to pay support,it's a proven fact, they don't or won't............