It doesn't really matter because the jury has no idea what the attorney said.
I agree with this. And I'm thinking it went something like this. . .(since we like dialogues)
Anthony's attorney (AA): It doesn't look good for Casey.
Anthony's (maybe just CA): What can we do? We don't want her to get the death penalty.
AA: So do you think she did it?
Anthony's: We don't know, but if she did, we don't want her to be found guilty of 1st degree, aggravated murder.
AA: Well, we can talk to the defense and see what can be done. You can change your story and we'll figure out how that can happen . . .legally.
Anthony's: Ok, sign me up! (I'll do whatever it takes. . .including perjuring myself)
That last part is my opinion!
That leads to the premature statement of Anthony's thinking she might be guilty. . .or found guilty. And it leads to the obvious powwow with Baez et al. . .and the result we saw today when Cindy was on the stand. It was really hard to watch! It was soooooo orchestrated and coached. Baez was all over the place. . .just making the points that Cindy was amazingly able to "recollect" now. And she showed signs of stress during the cross examination. . .and big relief when it was over. I have lost all respect for her. . .and any shred of empathy or compassion I had felt for her previously. The "right" thing to have done was to not contradict your previous testimony and instead have pleaded for your daughter's life during sentencing if, in fact, the jury finds her guilty. I think her plea would have carried some weight, seeing as most people felt horrible for her up to this point. Now I actually hope she does time for perjury. . .

And I'm really looking forward to the State's rebuttal now. . . I hope they shred her!