richmond282
Trumpet players don't have egos, we're just better
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2008
- Messages
- 2,183
When it comes to Baez's opening statement, it was a seed. From that point, his focus has to be on fertilizing (he's got THAT down) that seed so that the doubt of the prosecution's case grows. However, he doesn't have to prove his theory is fact. I think he's going to be successful in creating enough doubt that she will be found not guilty of the most serious charge, but not the rest.
I don't think he's created any doubt at all. Nothing in cross-examination seems to indicate that there was anybody else other than Casey involved in Caylee's disappearance/death. He has only proven that Casey is a LIAR. To me that shoots his theory out of the water just because an accidental drowning is what CASEY claims happened, but she's a LIAR so why believe that statement anyway.
I've been thinking about all this Xanex speculation. If Casey was drugging Caylee, where did the Xanex come from? No one (as far as I know) has ever found any Xanex in Casey's possession or come forward saying they supplied the Xanex or are missing any Xanex.
I think the name Zanny might have come from her friend Annie's name. A couple pages back someone linked an article about her. It said Annie used to live in Sawgrass Apartments and had friends and relatives with the same names as "Zanny's" relatives. I don't think Annie IS Zanny, but only the inspiration for the lies.