Casey Anthony Civil Trials Discussion

And the defense failed to mention that the swamp was not searched in the right spot...they were many yards away with thick underbrush. (watch Vinnie's tour....)

Then there is the whole witness tampering issue that is being investigated right now.:confused3

Experts can disagree--

I honestly don't see what the big deal is about the software that speaks of conspiracy. It is two competing companies that found 2 different results.

If someone can explain why one should be believed over the other, I might be able to try and understand. PRobably won't comprehend...but I might be able to understand.

I do not understand what the problem is this all came out at the trail didn't it? One company said 84 and one said 1 or 2.
 
A producer claims he met with Casey Anthony in Palm Springs today to discuss a $1million television deal, the MailOnline can exclusively reveal.

Al Taylor, who on Sunday said Anthony's first interview was a ‘done deal,’ claims he was called to the early morning meeting in an undisclosed location by Anthony’s legal team this morning.

He claims to have met with Anthony, who was flanked by her lawyer Jose Baez, for 15 to 20 minutes to discuss his proposal, he said.

‘I made a plea to her last night’ Mr Taylor said referring to his appearance on CNN's Issues show.

‘Jose's a great lawyer but he's not a great agent. Take the money,’ he had said.

Mr Taylor claims Mr Baez is reluctant for Anthony to work with him, but that she was keen.

‘She (Anthony) made them come to Palm Springs. She wants the money that's for sure, he said.

'No one else has the balls. I'm offering money from my own company. We're the only game in town.’

Mr Taylor said he has offered Anthony $1million to be interviewed by an as yet unconfirmed host, through his own company Private Elevator Productions.

The money was raised by unnamed investors, he added.

Mr Taylor had said part of the proposed show would include Anthony taking a lie detector test.

But after his alleged meeting with the 25-year-old this morning he said he would be willing to reconsider this aspect.

‘She was a little concerned about how she is going to look with the lie detector test,’ Mr Taylor said.

‘I said: "You're the most hated woman in America, if you have to do some weird things…

'We were worried she wouldn’t answer the questions. We wanted to get our million dollars’ worth.’
Anthony’s lawyer Mr Baez admitted he would meet with Mr Taylor to hear what he had to offer but denied the deal had been sealed during an interview with Fox News.

Mr Taylor, a freelance producer, also claimed he had given the Jerry Springer show first refusal of the Anthony interview.

A spokesman for the Springer show denied the conversation ever took place however.

Mr Taylor claims he has a written and verbal agreement with Mr Baez’s law firm and said he threatened to sue Anthony should she back out.

‘She said "If you're gonna sue me, join the line,”’ Mr Taylor said of Anthony.

He refused to comment on what Anthony had been wearing or where she was heading after their alleged meeting but did say she ‘seemed normal.’

‘You would never know she had been in jail for three years,’ he said.

Mr Taylor also claimed Anthony asked him never to call her 'Tot Mom.'

‘That was a sort of dig at Nancy Grace,’ he added.

While Mr Taylor said he would offer the interview with Anthony to a U.S. network for free he claims to have also contacted countries around the world – ‘even African countries’ – to discuss network deals.

The pair also discussed a potential $1million book deal at the alleged meeting, Mr Taylor claims.

The freelance producer said he told Anthony he had a ghost writer and also a title – ‘Not Guilty’ – in mind.

Because he is an independent publisher he 'can take the heat' of the likely boycott that would occur with such a controversial publication, he added.

Mr Taylor claims he left Anthony with the decision.

‘I gave her a hug and said "you do what you need to do."'

He then claims to have told her: 'you’ll be worth $100,000 in six weeks.’

Mr Taylor said he could turn a show around in a week should Anthony agree to the deal.

Anthony was thought to be in Carlsbad, California, according to the Today Show.

The private Pilatus PC-12 jet Anthony was whisked away on the morning of her release from Orange County Jail is owned by California attorney Todd Macaluso's firm, according to the news programme.

Macaluso had, at one point, been a member of Anthony's defence team and had given her $70,000.

The firm has an office at the Palomar Airport in Carlsbad.

However a Florida TV station claims Anthony was spotted landing at an executive airport back in Orlando late Monday in a private jet.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...V-deal-claims-producer.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
 
CurlyGirl wanted me to let everyone know that she won't be back for a month to the disboards. So I am letting you all know, she didn't just leave us! :)
 
I do not understand what the problem is this all came out at the trail didn't it? One company said 84 and one said 1 or 2.

Because it is someone's fault that Casey was acquitted.

We can't blame her or her defense team. The constitution says so.
We can't blame the jury. The constitution says so.
We must blame the prosecution. The constitution says so.

Defense isn't talking. What can we talk about?
Casey is walking but not talking. What can we talk about?
Prosecutions said their peace and don't want to talk anymore. What can we talk about?

We talk about stuff that proves prosecution screwed up. When I think the jury didn't even realize folks were talking about computers and blamed George who was not implicated in computer-gate.:confused3

It seems it is easy, when you search, to not find something.

Very hard to find something if it was never there in the first place. :confused3

And it's all a conspiracy, dontcha know?
 

HEY you know what this is starting to sound "kinda" like …. although she was not a Felon, but you all know how ANNA NICOLE SMITH and her atty HOWARD STERN go realllllllly close……………hmmmmm, Casey and Jose, sitting in a tree, k.i.s.s.i.n.g ……. and you all know the rest!!!!!!!!!!! :laughing:


Well, I for one am glad that Carlsbad will most likely NOT be her home because its MINE!!!!!!!!!!! :thumbsup2
 
I do not understand what the problem is this all came out at the trail didn't it? One company said 84 and one said 1 or 2.

But, the 84 times witness, said he was wrong and attempted to contact, the prosecution. The prosecution ignored him and objected to the defense bringing this up, knowing the info was wrong.
** Software designer and prosecution witness John Bradley says his CacheBack computer search program produced wrong results.
** Bradley says he told prosecutors of the error in late June, but says they never told the jury about his findings.
** Prosecutors repeatedly used the chloroform searches as critical evidence
 
CurlyGirl wanted me to let everyone know that she won't be back for a month to the disboards. So I am letting you all know, she didn't just leave us! :)

Well we appreciate her going on a spy mission for us.:rotfl:

Okay--I'm sure she didn't do that. Hope it is for good reason and not bad.
 
But, the 84 times witness, said he was wrong and attempted to contact, the prosecution. The prosecution ignored him and objected to the defense bringing this up, knowing the info was wrong.

I thought prosecution called one and Baez called the other.

You have me confused.:confused3

Was John Bradley called?
 
I thought prosecution called one and Baez called the other.

You have me confused.:confused3

Was John Bradley called?
Yes, Bradley testified to 84 times, defense expert..once. But, after the prosecution expert testified..he realized, the information was wrong.
A former Canadian police sergeant who specializes in computer forensic analysis, Mr. Bradley said he first became suspicious of the data after he testified on June 8. He said he had been called to testify by the prosecution about his CacheBack software. Instead, he was asked repeatedly about the Sheriff’s Office report detailing the 84 search hits on “chloroform,” which he had not seen.
 

Okay--I read another article and understand better.

In the wkmg article, this was mentioned:
After the results were mentioned in court on June 23rd, Mr. Bradley contacted the State the same day. He consulted as to a potential rebuttal to the defense regarding the error in his program and recommended using Net Analysis findings. All findings had previously been supplied to the defense in discovery.

On June 27th the discrepancy was discussed with Mr. Baez and both he and the prosecution agreed to use the Net Analysis return of 1 site visit count as the most accurate information available at the time. If additional information became available, the State agreed to disclose. Mr. Baez brought the discrepancy forward in court testimony and again at closing with his court exhibit," the response said.

The response also said Bradley never told prosecutors that there were inaccuracies with the search dates or times.


"We are dismayed at the suggestion made by the defense that prosecutors would withhold exculpatory material. Court records show that the defense was completely aware of the issues, utilizing these facts at trial," the response said.

In all this confusion--it sounds like the forensics experts, used the software wrong, but that wasn't found out until last month?

If it wasn't disclosed, how can prosecution be responsible for a deliberate cover up?

Yeah--it indeed still smells fishy.
 
She was just spotted getting off the plane in Orlando registered to Todd Macaluso. She was covering her head and running into the building. Wonder where she is going now?

http://www.wftv.com/news/28598791/detail.html

LOL! Is he tired of her already and bringing her back!?!?!

Well, so 84 times was incorrect and the prosecution knew it. Didn't another witness testify, the duct tape was arranged AFTER, the remains were found? So, that leaves us with the swamp...that was searched many times, but no body?:confused3

Duct tape was before the body decomposed and the swamp where her remains were was never searched.

CurlyGirl wanted me to let everyone know that she won't be back for a month to the disboards. So I am letting you all know, she didn't just leave us! :)

That stinks.

But, the 84 times witness, said he was wrong and attempted to contact, the prosecution. The prosecution ignored him and objected to the defense bringing this up, knowing the info was wrong.

The witness testified to 84 times then went back and retweaked the results which changed the number of times. He notified the prosecution AFTER they rested. From what I read that he posted he talked to a SGT with OCSO never with LDB.
 
Okay--I read another article and understand better.

In the wkmg article, this was mentioned:


In all this confusion--it sounds like the forensics experts, used the software wrong, but that wasn't found out until last month?

If it wasn't disclosed, how can prosecution be responsible for a deliberate cover up?

Yeah--it indeed still smells fishy.
People are accusing the state of not disclosing this mistake , which they supposedly knew, to the defense. Its all a bit confusing.

Bob Kealing from WESH is reporting that a statement was released saying that as per Court records, the State notified the defense of the mistake well before the trial ended and Baez was able to use this in his closing statement.

:confused3
 
Well, so 84 times was incorrect and the prosecution knew it. Didn't another witness testify, the duct tape was arranged AFTER, the remains were found? So, that leaves us with the swamp...that was searched many times, but no body?:confused3
State’s response to comments made by Mr. John Bradley, designer of the software
CacheBack, in today’s New York Times article

I do not understand what the problem is this all came out at the trail didn't it? One company said 84 and one said 1 or 2.

Yes.

HERE at 10:50 it is brought up by Bozo again hoping to get the Judge to order the State to again mention the error. Bozo actually did a good job on direct of disputing the numbers and pointing out the errors.

The "false" testimony he is referring to is actually a corrected report brought to attention after the State rested and after Cindy lied under oath.

As the Judge ruled, file the proper motions and it will be dealt with. As far as I can tell this article is just a ruse to stir controversy
 
LOL! Is he tired of her already and bringing her back!?!?!



Duct tape was before the body decomposed and the swamp where her remains were was never searched.


The witness testified to 84 times then went back and retweaked the results which changed the number of times. He notified the prosecution AFTER they rested. From what I read that he posted he talked to a SGT with OCSO never with LDB.

That area was searched more than once. The skull was outside, the bag, and the remains scattered by animals. An expert said, the tape was rearranged.

I do not believe, the prosecutions scenario.

I still, believe the jury should have been informed, regarding the software error. This was a big point, made by the prosecution.
 
Well, so 84 times was incorrect and the prosecution knew it. Didn't another witness testify, the duct tape was arranged AFTER, the remains were found? So, that leaves us with the swamp...that was searched many times, but no body?:confused3

Who testified to that? I admit I can't remember every single person anymore but the only one I remember that ORIGINALLY testified that the duct tape was placed after was Dr. Spitz. You want us to take the word of a past his prime, fame seeking, argumentative curmudgeon who has a reputation of arguing his case even when wrong?

The fact remains, Caylee was last seen in Casey's custody per her own defense lawyer. Something happened to Caylee. Since she ended up stuffed in plastic bags and dumped in a swamp while mom partied, while many people testified that the trunk smelled like decomposition during this same time period and Casey even admitted to that, yeah, I'm going with Casey killed Caylee.

IF, and that is a big if, George was involved in any way, shape or form, I am 100% in favor of prosecuting him to the fullest extent of the law. How bizarre that an innocent person such as Casey wouldn't have immediately pointed the finger at dad if he did it especially if she didn't have anything to do with it.

If they can ever prove George molested Casey, I am also in favor a stringing him up by his jewels. Besides the fact that none of this has been proven, it also doesn't give Casey a pass when her daughter died. Whether George had anything to do with it or not, whether he molested her daily, it isn't an excuse. You don't get to cover up a death simply because you were abused or because mommy might be mad at you.
 
That area was searched more than once. The skull was outside, the bag, and the remains scattered by animals. An expert said, the tape was rearranged.

I do not believe, the prosecutions scenario.

I still, believe the jury should have been informed, regarding the software error. This was a big point, made by the prosecution.

No the area wasn't searched more than once. The only person who looked in that area was Mr. Kronk.

Yes the skull was outside the bag. Yes the remains were scattered. The only rearranging of the duct tape was done when Caylees face decomposed and by the water.

The jury was informed of the discrepencies found in the reports.
 
That area was searched more than once. The skull was outside, the bag, and the remains scattered by animals. An expert said, the tape was rearranged.

I do not believe, the prosecutions scenario.

I still, believe the jury should have been informed, regarding the software error. This was a big point, made by the prosecution.

Curious why you believe the defense who simply told you that the area was searched and a body wasn't found but you don't believe the prosecution who actually had witnesses testify that they searched NEARBY areas and NEVER went to that exact spot? You are doing exactly what the jury did. You bought the opening argument and when there wasn't any proof, you didn't care.
 
CurlyGirl wanted me to let everyone know that she won't be back for a month to the disboards. So I am letting you all know, she didn't just leave us! :)

Say it isn't so?

If you're reading CurlyGirl, we'll miss you.
 












Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE


New Posts





DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter DIS Bluesky

Back
Top Bottom