Tonka's Skipper
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2010
- Messages
- 7,266
Or one could base it on the thousands of comments on the WDW Facebook page that are 3:1 negative.
however many of those comments are the same people repeating over and over.
AKK
Or one could base it on the thousands of comments on the WDW Facebook page that are 3:1 negative.
At some point, this theoretical "baseline" changes. For many, I'd guess that you can chuck a baseline several years old and set a new one as the standard. Unless of course, doing so doesn't buttress a case one is trying to make.
Otherwise, we should all be comparing our current lifestyle most directly to Marconi and Model Ts. (Or earlier, take your pick.)
And what is also important is that the locals ARE Disney. We work at Disney, we take our family that may be visiting us to Disney, we are the ones who provide Disney with its support (hospitals, police, roads). When everyone was afraid to fly after 9/11, who kept Disney open? Florida locals. When the economy tanked and tourism budgets were slashed who kept Disney open? Locals. We are not a group to be pawned off, Disney and locals have a very symbiotic relationship. Yes, us locals go whenever we want to, but we are also the ones who are very heavy FP- users. We try and make the most of our time at the parks, and FP- was a big part of that. So please do not count out a very large and important part of Disney's revenue.

Just wanted to whisk in here, and say thank you to everyone for the nice discussion. Everyone is making great points, and I mainly was posing the question of how long is Disney going to continue to invest in an over budget people tracking system when it could have invested in revamping of old rides, infrastructure improvements, light rail systems (instead of more pollution causing buses.), creating better food, and redecorating/revamping hotels.
One thing: I am a local. I am also a Passholder. When I got to Disney, I eat at their sit-down restaurants as well as the FF ones. My DS celebrates his birthday at Crystal Palace, and we have eaten at Le Cellier, the French Bistro, Biergarden, Boma, Tony's, Cinderella's, Morroco, Mexico, and many other sit-downs. To say locals only come in for a day, eat at the FF places and FF on the way home is a little offensive. Lots of locals come to Epcot for the food, or the MK for special days. And we do buy stuff. Stuff for our friends, special pins, exclusive merch, etc. And we ride rides. Lots of rides! We go for the rides. And we go to hard ticket events like the Christmas party and Halloween. Why do you think there are FL local discounts? Disney courts us, they want us to be there, they want us at the hotels, parks and special events. So the new FP+ system is a bit of a mystery to me. Also, I really hated spending my time looking at a cell phone when I could have been paying attention to my family and my DS.
And what is also important is that the locals ARE Disney. We work at Disney, we take our family that may be visiting us to Disney, we are the ones who provide Disney with its support (hospitals, police, roads). When everyone was afraid to fly after 9/11, who kept Disney open? Florida locals. When the economy tanked and tourism budgets were slashed who kept Disney open? Locals. We are not a group to be pawned off, Disney and locals have a very symbiotic relationship.
Yes, us locals go whenever we want to, but we are also the ones who are very heavy FP- users. We try and make the most of our time at the parks, and FP- was a big part of that. So please do not count out a very large and important part of Disney's revenue.
I think that this holds true for the Disney veteran - our baseline involves the use of fast passes.
1. But remember that many (maybe most ???) parks do not have fast passes - certainly not for free.
2. So for new guests, the baseline truly is "standby only".

I think you are vastly overestimating how much Disney cares about locals.

I agree that new guests unfamiliar with legacy FP will believe this to be an improvement. And I maintain that guests who used legacy FP minimally also see this as an improvement. Doesn't mean I have to like it. If that makes me "spoiled" in some circles, so be it.![]()
They will not "believe" it to be an improvement - it will be an improvement. 3 free fast passes which can be reserved in advance is much better than no fast passes, or having to pay for fast passes for most people. That is their baseline.
They will not "believe" it to be an improvement - it will be an improvement. 3 free fast passes which can be reserved in advance is much better than no fast passes, or having to pay for fast passes for most people. That is their baseline.

They will not "believe" it to be an improvement - it will be an improvement. 3 free fast passes which can be reserved in advance is much better than no fast passes, or having to pay for fast passes for most people. That is their baseline.
1. Actually, I think most parks have it monetized in some form or another.
2. I agree that new guests unfamiliar with legacy FP will believe this to be an improvement. And I maintain that guests who used legacy FP minimally also see this as an improvement. Doesn't mean I have to like it. If that makes me "spoiled" (dare I say "entitled") by legacy FP in some circles, so be it.![]()
...Disney didn't really care if guests used FP-, but they are pushing FP+ as hard as Kroger pushes their customer card because they want the data.
WDW just announced yesterday that the first quarter sent an all time attendance record for WDW. I don't think MB or FP+ is going anywhere.
Hey - it was actually Q4 (Oct. Nov. Dec.) and was across the entire Disney Company.
I don't intend this to be snarky or sarcastic in any way, so please don't take it that way. This is a sincere question that so far, has largely eluded an answer here. Here goes: Insofar as this relates to FP+, does "It worked perfectly for us" mean that you found it to be a tremendous improvement over the old system, or simply that you have no complaints about it? There have been many, many posts such as yours where people are stating that "it worked for them", and there is no basis to question that conclusion at all. But what seems to be missing is the taking of the next step. Did you find that getting 3 FP+ per day at one park only with tiering and no repeats is better than the old system, just as good, or not as good, but perfectly acceptable? I think that it is very clear how the people who do not like FP+ come out in all of this. But there seems to be a lack of clarity coming from the other side. Lots of "we liked it" and "it worked for us" posts, which is fine. But it isn't necessarily the case that those responses are coming from people who view this as an improvement as opposed to merely a change that they can adjust to. Hope that made sense.
p.s. This question actually goes out to anyone who falls into the "we liked it" or "it worked for us" camp, and not just PrincessJo, so anyone is free to comment. (Obviously.)
My DD likes it, and usually just rides single rider if she chooses to ride it at all. Disney's not going to admit it's a fail because they dont' consider it one - it's doing exactly what Disney intended for it to do.