Yeah, that's the theme, bash the poster when you can't tackle the evidence. IMO, you just lost the argument with your childish, immature, responses.
Sorry, you can put me on ignore, I'm not interested in uniformed opinion.
Again, these videos may be way off the mark, but you've not done or said anything that would counter them. You just attack. As an American, that is your right and I would die to protect that right.
You haven't given any evidence AT ALL! All you've said is that you've watched a conspiracy video.
Without going into all the conspiracy theories, let;s just focus on the most common one-- That the WTC were blown up intentionally by the government and that simply flying a jet liner couldn't cause the collapse. That the collapse was too much like an implosion and planned demolition.
1. A planned demolition of the building would use high explosives in a sequential order of charges and floors. These charges are placed beginning at the base and go UP.
2. These supposed demolition charges were placed on the floors where the planes had hit and exploded in a ball of fire. However, this massive explosion did not set off these supposed demolition charges, nor did this massive hit by an aircraft sever any of the cabling/primer for these charges.
3. The pilots would have to hit the building at the exact floors of the charges to make it "look real". Excellent piloting by amateur pilots.
4. These charges would have to be set on these floors without anyone witnessing the charges and primer cords being placed. No witnesses to this activity
5. Professional demo companies will remove non-load bearing walls from the building and partially pre-cut primary support throughout the building to promote a clean collapse of the building. No witnesses of such activity.
6. Theorists claim the steel couldn't have reached a temperature hot enough to melt. Explained by PM and by the butter example.
7. Steel with jutted angles after the collapse. Not all the building was the same temperature. Steel was bent, twisted, and jagged.
8. Puffs of dust and debris that bblew out the sides at the point of initial collapse prove that there were explosive charges. Except that the building was full of million of cubic feet of air. Whebn the first floor collapsed (and each successive floor, the air gets pushed OUT at an extreme rate, pushing dust and debris out.
9. The tallest building ever intentionally demolished by explosives was 469 feet and 25 stories tall (Hudson bldg in Detroit in 1998). The WTCs were approximately 1,360 feet tall and 110 stories. If we are to believe the conspiracy theorists, the gov't would have to plan to fly two airlines into the exact floors of he buildings, plant charges and weaken the building sufficuently to cause it's collapse without anybody seeing. Implement this plan to bring down a building three times taller with 4 times as many stories, then do it again within 20 minutes of the first one and then bring down a third building (WTC 7) that is twice as tall as tall as the previous record demolition only 7 hours later. (3 world-record demolitions in 7 hours!!

)
So, it sounds like you and the other conspiracy supporters think it is more believable that the government is capable of pulling all that off, in addition to the missile/plane attack on the Pentagon and the "shoot down of flight 93", rather than believe that 19 Muslim terrorist planned and hijacked 4 airliners and succesfully flew 3 of them into buildings.
Yep, perfectly logical. I can also see how you can believe that Obama could sit in a Church for 20 years and not know that it was a BLF church and that his friend, pastor and close spiritual advisor was a racist hate-monger.