I am not against banning plastic bags, I am against the mandatory charges for the multi-use or paper bags the stores can give you. Why? Because that money is just a bribe to the grocery stores to go along with the nonsense. The money you pay for take-out bags does not benefit the environment one bit. Think about it; what kept the stores from charging you for bags before the law went into effect? Absolutely nothing - it's so disingenuous. Also, is there anything else you can get in a store that there is a law mandating its minimum price? Nope. We call them "dime bags" (because, you know, they cost a dime?)
As for the reusable bags;
We call them "stupid bags". Why? Because it never fails, you get almost done in the store, kids in tow, when - OOOPS! You left the bags in the car. Now you have to either buy bags (I need more of those like a hole in the head), go back out to the car (not happening if you are solo with the kids) or take the groceries to the car in the shopping cart. It makes you feel really stupid, right? Those things take up half of the trunk of each of our cars, plus we've got a stash in the house - they're everywhere!
If there is going to be a ban on plastic shopping bags, then there should also be a ban or surcharge on those millions of little Keurig plastic coffee pods. Since the invention, there has to be MILLIONS in the landfill already. I've been in Fortune 500 office buildings, where ONE floor can go through 75 pods in a DAY.These sky-rises are often 20 - 60 floors high. One plastic item shouldn't be surcharged, while millions of other unnecessary plastic other things are not being surcharged.
Can (general) you tell, I am on a rant about these plastic surcharge/bans.![]()
![]()
NY just passed a plastic bag ban.
It also allows counties to charge 5 cents per paper bag.
We call them "dime bags" (because, you know, they cost a dime?)
From the same article the OP quoted.
"That said, the Danish government's estimate doesn't take into account the effects of bags littering land and sea, where plastic is clearly the worst offender."
A study purporting to show environmental impact that failed to take into account a major environmental impact comes out to 20,000 uses? hmmmmm.
"A 2011 study by the U.K. government found a person would have to reuse a cotton tote bag 131 times before it was better for climate change than using a plastic grocery bag"
Oh but wait. There's more.
Those studies were done on a per bag basis, and thus also didn't take into account that your average reusable bag can hold three times what the plastic bags do or that due to rips and the like, many of those plastic bags don't even get used once. So that 131 is knocked down to 43.
Oh but wait. There's even more. Those studies were for cotton reusable bags. Well I have reusable bags from several stores including four national grocery chains here in the states and guess what. They aren't made out of Cotton. So the 131 figure doesn't apply to them. They're made out of Polypropylene. They only require 11 uses on a per bag basis to be more environmentally friendly. And again taking into account their greater capacity, we're down to 4. Oh and these bags are recyclable when you can no longer use them.
So. Think you can use the reusable bag 4 times? I know I can. I'm well over 150 with mine that would easily beat the UK study even if they were cotton.
Whatever happened to making a pot of coffee for the office?
Those things are awful. I make coffee using paper filters (which degrade nicely TYVM). Kuerigs are awful, and also make bad coffee. I cringe when I see them. If you use the reusable filters for them, it's ok...most people don't however.
Plus those Keurigs are a couple hundred dollars per machine. And the pods are way overpriced. So, if people are going to pay for that "convenience" to make single cups of coffee, they can certainly afford to pay a surcharge on filling out landfills.
My Black & Decker single cup DRIP coffee maker (with dollar store paper filter insdie the permanent filter,) finally burnt out after 17 years. I know, because I checked to see when I reviewed it on Amazon. It worked so well and for so long, and didn't fill up landfills, that I bought the same model again.It was on sale for $15 at Target this past Christmas. Should last me another 15+ years without contributing to landfills.
Same here. Some things can’t be placed in a reusable bag.We use the bags for cat litter, so one reuse only. I'm not a fan of the ban. I'd just have to go buy small garbage bags for cat litter.
We call them "dime bags" (because, you know, they cost a dime?)
Is that how much they will be allowed to charge us? Because I was at Whole Foods, brought my own plastic grocery bag, that I reused, and they took 10 cents off my bill.
We have a Brew Express hooked up to our RO that has two brew baskets, one for full and half pots and one for single cups/to go cups and bowls for Ramen or the like. You can buy a pod like attachment for it but I don’t see why you’d want to.Plus those Keurigs are a couple hundred dollars per machine. And the pods are way overpriced. So, if people are going to pay for that "convenience" to make single cups of coffee, they can certainly afford to pay a surcharge on filling out landfills.
My Black & Decker single cup DRIP coffee maker (with dollar store paper filter insdie the permanent filter,) finally burnt out after 17 years. I know, because I checked to see when I reviewed it on Amazon. It worked so well and for so long, and didn't fill up landfills, that I bought the same model again.It was on sale for $15 at Target this past Christmas. Should last me another 15+ years without contributing to landfills.
![]()
The question is are they really dime bags anymore? You didn’t get a whole lot back in the day I can’t imagine it would much at all now.I think you are very confused about the most typical definition of a "dime bag." Maybe don't ask for any out in public?
The question is are they really dime bags anymore? You didn’t get a whole lot back in the day I can’t imagine it would much at all now.