Anyone else a SAHM who doesn't plan on returning to the work force?

Glad to see I am not alone, but let me clarify. I am talking about contining to be a SAHM (wife) well after the kids are gone. Just to make life easier for DH and to continue to be there as support for my kids as they enter adult life. I like to be the glue that holds it all together. :goodvibes DH and I have had many conversations about this because sometimes I do feel guilty that I can plan my day the way I want. He insists that me staying home makes his life easier because I take care of all the necessary stuff. Someone else said they felt they were born in the worng century because they loved to take care of the house, kids and stuff. I can relate. I enjoy what I do, and boy, do I do it well!!!! :rotfl2: :rotfl2:
 
The plan was that I would never return to the workforce BUT DH's career that used to be rock solid is solid no longer.

Trying to figure out Act III. I do want to be home more than full time work would allow. Teenagers need supervision. Thinking of starting a Kumon franchise rather than returning to my field.
 
Count me in as one of those SAHM's who isn't sure if she'll ever return to the regular workforce.

I have a BS in Engineering and worked for several years as an engineer and manager before staying home after the birth of my first child. Now that my eldest is starting Kindergarten, I've had a few people ask if I'll go back to "work" when my youngest hits Kindergarten. I'm honestly not sure... firstly, my husband makes a good income, so my income would be taxed at close to 40% (federal, state, medicare, and SSI); secondly, we live in a rural area with no before-school care and minimal after-school care opportunities; and thirdly, I'm not convinced that DH would be willing to take up more of the household responsibilities if-and-when I return to the workforce.

Presently, I'm enjoying being with the kids and keeping the house and our family well organized. I'm not sure what the future brings....
 
Oh wow, I'm not alone!! I also am a SAHM with a BA in business, and I'm not planning on going back to work either. My husband and I both prefer it this way.
 

Skatermom23 said:
Glad to see I am not alone, but let me clarify. I am talking about contining to be a SAHM (wife) well after the kids are gone. Just to make life easier for DH and to continue to be there as support for my kids as they enter adult life. I like to be the glue that holds it all together. :goodvibes DH and I have had many conversations about this because sometimes I do feel guilty that I can plan my day the way I want. He insists that me staying home makes his life easier because I take care of all the necessary stuff. Someone else said they felt they were born in the worng century because they loved to take care of the house, kids and stuff. I can relate. I enjoy what I do, and boy, do I do it well!!!! :rotfl2: :rotfl2:

In my post I stated that I was never going back to work. That means after the kids are off on their own. I don't need to work and I enjoy staying home so I will continue to do that.
 
txgirl said:
Hello kindred spirit! :wave2: I have echoed the above sentiment countless times. I love what I do and it is actually my *dream job* (see my profile ;) ). I can remember as a child, sticking pillows under my shirt and pretending to be pregnant! :rotfl2:

There is a huge hold in my heart for my mother who died when she was only 37 years old. Her life as a mother (sahm) completely shaped who I am and how much I value the passing of time, especially childhood.

Your feelings of dread and despair on going back to work crack me up! :rotfl: I have said the same thing and when my girlfriends who work in an office talk about their day, my stomach starts to churn and I feel a great big heave coming on!!!!! :sick:

To each their own, but if I get to live out my fantasy dream job, then I will be making trips to visit my kids in college instead of pushing papers when they are grown. When they are married, I will be helping them furnish their new homes, having them over for dinner, and spoiling my grandkids rotten!!!! :teeth: Hopefully, if we plan right I can splurge and provide Disney trips for the whole clan :)

Blessings!

Hello back atcha!! Sorry to hear about your mom, but glad to know that she helped you become the person you are. That is my goal in staying home and I am sure your mom would be very proud.

I had to write because everytime there is a SAHM thread lately, your posts are right on target with my thoughts. I agree with your fantasy job, I want to help and be there for my kids throughout their entire lives! Not in a pushy way, just so they know I am there for anything and everything that comes their way. I also am dying to take my kids and hopefully future grandkids on Disney trips and it will be a fulltime job just to plan those. My favorite thought is that I will be 76 years old for Disneyland's 100th anniversary. I was there for the 50th with my kids, and I hope to be there with them and theirs for the 100th too!

Well good to talk to you, I am actually happy to see that there are more moms out there with the same feelings toward SAH. Here in Vegas, things are so work driven and it's all about who you know here and that gets old quick!
Not for me!

BTW, I saw that you stayed at POR last year? Any thoughts? Would you stay at POFQ or stick with POR? PM me if you want, don't want to go too much off topic!


Andrea
 
http://www.prospect.org/web/printfriendly-view.ww?id=10659

Modern Love
Paradise Lost (Domestic Division)

By TERRY MARTIN HEKKER
Published: January 1, 2006

A WHILE back, at a baby shower for a niece, I overheard the expectant mother being asked if she intended to return to work after the baby was born. The answer, which rocked me, was, "Yes, because I don't want to end up like Aunt Terry."

That would be me.

In the continuing case of Full-Time Homemaker vs. Working Mother, I offer myself as Exhibit A. Because more than a quarter-century ago I wrote an Op-Ed article for The New York Times on the satisfaction of being a full-time housewife in the new age of the liberated woman. I wrote it from my heart, thoroughly convinced that homemaking and raising my children was the most challenging and rewarding job I could ever want.

"I come from a long line of women," I wrote, "most of them more Edith Bunker than Betty Freidan, who never knew they were unfulfilled. I can't testify that they were happy, but they were cheerful. ...They took pride in a clean, comfortable home and satisfaction in serving a good meal because no one had explained that the only work worth doing is that for which you get paid."

I wasn't advocating that mothers forgo careers to stay home with their children; I was simply defending my choice as a valid one. The mantra of the age may have been "Do your own thing," but as a full-time homemaker, that didn't seem to mean me.

The column morphed into a book titled "Ever Since Adam and Eve," followed by a national tour on which I, however briefly, became the authority on homemaking as a viable choice for women. I ultimately told my story on "Today" and to Dinah Shore, Charlie Rose and even to Oprah, when she was the host of a local TV show in Baltimore.

In subsequent years I lectured on the rewards of homemaking and housewifery. While others tried to make the case that women like me were parasites and little more than legalized prostitutes, I spoke to rapt audiences about the importance of being there for your children as they grew up, of the satisfactions of "making a home," preparing family meals and supporting your hard-working husband.

So I was predictably stunned and devastated when, on our 40th wedding anniversary, my husband presented me with a divorce. I knew our first anniversary would be paper, but never expected the 40th would be papers, 16 of them meticulously detailing my faults and flaws, the reason our marriage, according to him, was over.

We had been married by a bishop with a blessing from the pope in a country church filled with honeysuckle and hope. Five children and six grandchildren later we were divorced by a third-rate judge in a suburban courthouse reeking of dust and despair.

Our long marriage had its full share of love, complications, illnesses, joy and stress. Near the end we were in a dismal period, with my husband in treatment for alcoholism. And although I had made more than my share of mistakes, I never expected to be served with divorce papers. I was stunned to find myself, at this stage of life, marooned. And it was small comfort that I wasn't alone. There were many other confused women of my age and circumstance who'd been married just as long, sharing my situation.

I WAS in my teens when I first read Dickens's "Great Expectations," with the tale of Miss Haversham, who, stood up by her groom-to-be, spent decades in her yellowing wedding gown, sitting at her cobweb-covered bridal banquet table, consumed with plotting revenge. I felt then that to be left waiting at the altar with a church full of people must be the most crushing thing that could happen to a woman.

I was wrong. No jilted bride could feel as embarrassed and humiliated as a woman in her 60's discarded by her husband. I was confused and scared, and the pain of being tossed aside by the love of my life made bitterness unavoidable. In those first few bewildering months, as I staggered and wailed though my life, I made Miss Haversham look like a good sport.

Sitting around my kitchen with two friends who had also been dumped by their husbands, I figured out that among the three of us we'd been married 110 years. We'd been faithful wives, good mothers, cooks and housekeepers who'd married in the 50's, when "dress for success" meant a wedding gown and "wife" was a tenured position.

Turns out we had a lot in common with our outdated kitchen appliances. Like them we were serviceable, low maintenance, front loading, self-cleaning and (relatively) frost free. Also like them we had warranties that had run out. Our husbands sought sleeker models with features we lacked who could execute tasks we'd either never learned or couldn't perform without laughing.

Like most loyal wives of our generation, we'd contemplated eventual widowhood but never thought we'd end up divorced. And "divorced" doesn't begin to describe the pain of this process. "Canceled" is more like it. It began with my credit cards, then my health insurance and checkbook, until, finally, like a used postage stamp, I felt canceled too.

I faced frightening losses and was overwhelmed by the injustice of it all. He got to take his girlfriend to Cancun, while I got to sell my engagement ring to pay the roofer. When I filed my first nonjoint tax return, it triggered the shocking notification that I had become eligible for food stamps.

The judge had awarded me alimony that was less than I was used to getting for household expenses, and now I had to use that money to pay bills I'd never seen before: mortgage, taxes, insurance and car payments. And that princely sum was awarded for only four years, the judge suggesting that I go for job training when I turned 67. Not only was I unprepared for divorce itself, I was utterly lacking in skills to deal with the brutal aftermath.

I read about the young mothers of today - educated, employed, self-sufficient - who drop out of the work force when they have children, and I worry and wonder. Perhaps it is the right choice for them. Maybe they'll be fine. But the fragility of modern marriage suggests that at least half of them may not be.

Regrettably, women whose husbands are devoted to their families and are good providers must nevertheless face the specter of future abandonment. Surely the seeds of this wariness must have been planted, even if they can't believe it could ever happen to them. Many have witnessed their own mothers jettisoned by their own fathers and seen divorced friends trying to rear children with marginal financial and emotional support.

These young mothers are often torn between wanting to be home with their children and the statistical possibility of future calamity, aware that one of the most poverty-stricken groups in today's society are divorced older women. The feminine and sexual revolutions of the last few decades have had their shining victories, but have they, in the end, made things any easier for mothers?

I cringe when I think of that line from my Op-Ed article about the long line of women I'd come from and belonged to who were able to find fulfillment as homemakers "because no one had explained" to us "that the only work worth doing is that for which you get paid." For a divorced mother, the harsh reality is that the work for which you do get paid is the only work that will keep you afloat.

These days couples face complex negotiations over work, family, child care and housekeeping. I see my children dealing with these issues in their marriages, and I understand the stresses and frustrations. It becomes evident that where traditional marriage through the centuries had been a partnership based on mutual dependency, modern marriage demands greater self-sufficiency.

WHILE today's young women know from the start they'll face thorny decisions regarding careers, marriage and children, those of us who married in the 50's anticipated lives similar to our mothers' and grandmothers'. Then we watched with bewilderment as all the rules changed, and the goal posts were moved.

If I had it to do over again, I'd still marry the man I married and have my children: they are my treasure and a powerful support system for me and for one another. But I would have used the years after my youngest started school to further my education. I could have amassed two doctorates using the time and energy I gave to charitable and community causes and been better able to support myself.

But in a lucky twist, my community involvement had resulted in my being appointed to fill a vacancy on our Village Board. I had been serving as titular deputy mayor of my hometown (Nyack, N.Y.) when my husband left me. Several weeks later the mayor chose not to run again because of failing health, and I was elected to succeed him, becoming the first female mayor.

I held office for six years, a challenging, full-time job that paid a whopping annual salary of $8,000. But it consumed me and gave me someplace to go every day and most nights, and as such it saved my sanity. Now, mostly retired except for some part-time work, I am kept on my toes by 12 amazing grandchildren.

My anachronistic book was written while I was in a successful marriage that I expected would go on forever. Sadly, it now has little relevance for modern women, except perhaps as a cautionary tale: never its intended purpose. So I couldn't imagine writing a sequel. But my friend Elaine did come up with a perfect title: "Disregard First Book."
 
PatriciaH said:
http://www.prospect.org/web/printfriendly-view.ww?id=10659

Modern Love
Paradise Lost (Domestic Division)

By TERRY MARTIN HEKKER
Published: January 1, 2006

A WHILE back, at a baby shower for a niece, I overheard the expectant mother being asked if she intended to return to work after the baby was born. The answer, which rocked me, was, "Yes, because I don't want to end up like Aunt Terry."

That would be me.

In the continuing case of Full-Time Homemaker vs. Working Mother, I offer myself as Exhibit A. Because more than a quarter-century ago I wrote an Op-Ed article for The New York Times on the satisfaction of being a full-time housewife in the new age of the liberated woman. I wrote it from my heart, thoroughly convinced that homemaking and raising my children was the most challenging and rewarding job I could ever want.

"I come from a long line of women," I wrote, "most of them more Edith Bunker than Betty Freidan, who never knew they were unfulfilled. I can't testify that they were happy, but they were cheerful. ...They took pride in a clean, comfortable home and satisfaction in serving a good meal because no one had explained that the only work worth doing is that for which you get paid."

I wasn't advocating that mothers forgo careers to stay home with their children; I was simply defending my choice as a valid one. The mantra of the age may have been "Do your own thing," but as a full-time homemaker, that didn't seem to mean me.

The column morphed into a book titled "Ever Since Adam and Eve," followed by a national tour on which I, however briefly, became the authority on homemaking as a viable choice for women. I ultimately told my story on "Today" and to Dinah Shore, Charlie Rose and even to Oprah, when she was the host of a local TV show in Baltimore.

In subsequent years I lectured on the rewards of homemaking and housewifery. While others tried to make the case that women like me were parasites and little more than legalized prostitutes, I spoke to rapt audiences about the importance of being there for your children as they grew up, of the satisfactions of "making a home," preparing family meals and supporting your hard-working husband.

So I was predictably stunned and devastated when, on our 40th wedding anniversary, my husband presented me with a divorce. I knew our first anniversary would be paper, but never expected the 40th would be papers, 16 of them meticulously detailing my faults and flaws, the reason our marriage, according to him, was over.

We had been married by a bishop with a blessing from the pope in a country church filled with honeysuckle and hope. Five children and six grandchildren later we were divorced by a third-rate judge in a suburban courthouse reeking of dust and despair.

Our long marriage had its full share of love, complications, illnesses, joy and stress. Near the end we were in a dismal period, with my husband in treatment for alcoholism. And although I had made more than my share of mistakes, I never expected to be served with divorce papers. I was stunned to find myself, at this stage of life, marooned. And it was small comfort that I wasn't alone. There were many other confused women of my age and circumstance who'd been married just as long, sharing my situation.

I WAS in my teens when I first read Dickens's "Great Expectations," with the tale of Miss Haversham, who, stood up by her groom-to-be, spent decades in her yellowing wedding gown, sitting at her cobweb-covered bridal banquet table, consumed with plotting revenge. I felt then that to be left waiting at the altar with a church full of people must be the most crushing thing that could happen to a woman.

I was wrong. No jilted bride could feel as embarrassed and humiliated as a woman in her 60's discarded by her husband. I was confused and scared, and the pain of being tossed aside by the love of my life made bitterness unavoidable. In those first few bewildering months, as I staggered and wailed though my life, I made Miss Haversham look like a good sport.

Sitting around my kitchen with two friends who had also been dumped by their husbands, I figured out that among the three of us we'd been married 110 years. We'd been faithful wives, good mothers, cooks and housekeepers who'd married in the 50's, when "dress for success" meant a wedding gown and "wife" was a tenured position.

Turns out we had a lot in common with our outdated kitchen appliances. Like them we were serviceable, low maintenance, front loading, self-cleaning and (relatively) frost free. Also like them we had warranties that had run out. Our husbands sought sleeker models with features we lacked who could execute tasks we'd either never learned or couldn't perform without laughing.

Like most loyal wives of our generation, we'd contemplated eventual widowhood but never thought we'd end up divorced. And "divorced" doesn't begin to describe the pain of this process. "Canceled" is more like it. It began with my credit cards, then my health insurance and checkbook, until, finally, like a used postage stamp, I felt canceled too.

I faced frightening losses and was overwhelmed by the injustice of it all. He got to take his girlfriend to Cancun, while I got to sell my engagement ring to pay the roofer. When I filed my first nonjoint tax return, it triggered the shocking notification that I had become eligible for food stamps.

The judge had awarded me alimony that was less than I was used to getting for household expenses, and now I had to use that money to pay bills I'd never seen before: mortgage, taxes, insurance and car payments. And that princely sum was awarded for only four years, the judge suggesting that I go for job training when I turned 67. Not only was I unprepared for divorce itself, I was utterly lacking in skills to deal with the brutal aftermath.

I read about the young mothers of today - educated, employed, self-sufficient - who drop out of the work force when they have children, and I worry and wonder. Perhaps it is the right choice for them. Maybe they'll be fine. But the fragility of modern marriage suggests that at least half of them may not be.

Regrettably, women whose husbands are devoted to their families and are good providers must nevertheless face the specter of future abandonment. Surely the seeds of this wariness must have been planted, even if they can't believe it could ever happen to them. Many have witnessed their own mothers jettisoned by their own fathers and seen divorced friends trying to rear children with marginal financial and emotional support.

These young mothers are often torn between wanting to be home with their children and the statistical possibility of future calamity, aware that one of the most poverty-stricken groups in today's society are divorced older women. The feminine and sexual revolutions of the last few decades have had their shining victories, but have they, in the end, made things any easier for mothers?

I cringe when I think of that line from my Op-Ed article about the long line of women I'd come from and belonged to who were able to find fulfillment as homemakers "because no one had explained" to us "that the only work worth doing is that for which you get paid." For a divorced mother, the harsh reality is that the work for which you do get paid is the only work that will keep you afloat.

These days couples face complex negotiations over work, family, child care and housekeeping. I see my children dealing with these issues in their marriages, and I understand the stresses and frustrations. It becomes evident that where traditional marriage through the centuries had been a partnership based on mutual dependency, modern marriage demands greater self-sufficiency.

WHILE today's young women know from the start they'll face thorny decisions regarding careers, marriage and children, those of us who married in the 50's anticipated lives similar to our mothers' and grandmothers'. Then we watched with bewilderment as all the rules changed, and the goal posts were moved.

If I had it to do over again, I'd still marry the man I married and have my children: they are my treasure and a powerful support system for me and for one another. But I would have used the years after my youngest started school to further my education. I could have amassed two doctorates using the time and energy I gave to charitable and community causes and been better able to support myself.

But in a lucky twist, my community involvement had resulted in my being appointed to fill a vacancy on our Village Board. I had been serving as titular deputy mayor of my hometown (Nyack, N.Y.) when my husband left me. Several weeks later the mayor chose not to run again because of failing health, and I was elected to succeed him, becoming the first female mayor.

I held office for six years, a challenging, full-time job that paid a whopping annual salary of $8,000. But it consumed me and gave me someplace to go every day and most nights, and as such it saved my sanity. Now, mostly retired except for some part-time work, I am kept on my toes by 12 amazing grandchildren.

My anachronistic book was written while I was in a successful marriage that I expected would go on forever. Sadly, it now has little relevance for modern women, except perhaps as a cautionary tale: never its intended purpose. So I couldn't imagine writing a sequel. But my friend Elaine did come up with a perfect title: "Disregard First Book."


While that is true in some respects, it wouldn't make me change my mind. My children are my world, and look how well things turned out for the author. 12 amazing grandchildren from her amazing children whom she raised at home!

Andrea
 
It was nice to see this post, because I often feel guilty about not wanting to return to work! I've learned to stretch my DH's paycheck so that we can live, but it's not easy on under $40K a year! However, it's SO important for me to be here for my two boys.

I've been a SAHM for the past 11 years, but for 4 of them, I sold real estate part time. I hated it. I have my BS in Elementary/Early Childhood Ed, and just this past March, began sub. teaching for our school district. I loved being able to pick and choose my days and schools, and best yet, I was able to see my kids off to school, and pick them up too! Most times, I even subbed in their school, so I'd bump into them in the hall and grab a quick hug!

This fall, I will be working 6 hours a week, teaching pre-school at our church. It is just Monday and Friday mornings and will not interfere with my kids' schedules at all. On the other days, I still plan to sub teach, but on my terms.

This little bit of working is great for me. I've always said that I don't want to return to work unless it fits my life. With subbing and pre-school, I'm still able to be home and clean my house, go to the grocery store, etc. when the kids are in school. I can volunteer in school (which I do alot of!) and I'm home with them after school and can take them to their activities. And we get a little extra income too.

I have full-time working friends who have made comments about my wasting my degree and make me feel like a load. I try to let it slide, but they just choose to live their lives differently than I do. They work to pay for daycare and the newest "toys"...(cars, etc.), and I just don't like that idea for us!
 
Add me to the group. My children are 3 and 5 and I have no plans of returning to work when my children enter school. I have a BS in accounting and I use it to help friends and family do their taxes. If everything stays the same with dh job, I will continue to stay at home and take care of everything. I agree with the op's that my dh is spoiled. He likes it that the weekends are free and we do not have to try to catch up on the laundry or cleaning. I do get every upset when someone asks when I will be going back to work. I did not want children so that someone else can care for them while I am at work.
 
I was a SAHM until my youngest started 1st grade. Then DH insisted I get a job, so I went back to college for 3 years, got a BS degree in Education, and taught school for 3 years. I liked it, but hated that I was neglecting my family, and realized that my kids would be gone in a few years, so I came back home. (I agree with those who've said that our kids need us even more when they're teens!)

When my youngest goes to college I MAY work for a few years to pay for the Disney wedding she wants, but that's it. I love being a wife and mom and making our house a home! And yes, even when the kids are gone, I'll still love making a home for my wonderful DH!
 
I was a SAHM for 13 years. I LOVED "being there" for my kids & hubby. I would NEVER have traded those years for all the money in the world!

WHY do I know that this was a good choice for us? Because - both of my adult kids (30 & 32) have thanked me for "being there" for them. They respected my DH's and my decision to raise them as WE felt we should. Do not listen to others - your decisions are just that - YOURS!

Now - we have an "odd couple" switch. (I am 60, DH is 63.) For the last four years, HE has run the house, done all the errands, etc, etc, while I continue to work. It is HEAVEN! I really do enjoy the "no housework for me" thing. Everything is done for me. All I do is go to work. Life is good.

So - enjoy your SAH status. Life changes too quickly. We're here to do what we feel is right.

(OK - I'll get off my soapbox now!) :blush:
 
I'm not sure. I am open to it, but I can't see myself going to a 40 hour a week job, ever. I want to be available for the kids when they are in jr high and high school (a time when perhaps it's even MORE important for me to be home in the afternoons when they get home from school).

I have a BA in Child Development. I can see myself just using that experience and education by being an assistant of some sort in a local school, maybe 25 hours a week or so.
 
This thread really came at the right time for me. With a degree in nursing I have so many opportunities in job flexibility. Yet, even though I am working only 12- 18 hours/ pay I still chafe under it. I love OB nursing, but the politics, drama, and boatloads of mandatory skill testing are driving me crazy. The hospital setting is so stressful.

I know that I could stay home. We would make it work. I desperately want to... yet I am afraid of letting go of that "life line" of extra financial security.

Thanks for sharing your positive experiences. I have been encouraged and inspired. It's nice to know I am not alone in my strong desire to me home with my children.
 
I could never stay home but I applaud all you moms who do so. I love to work, I love that we never want for anything and working 3 12's a week on night shift really doesn't take much time away from my child because I sleep while she is in school/camp and I am awake for her when she is home. One of the things I love about nursing. The best part is that DH works seasonal as a brick layer so he is home much of the winter doing all the SAHD things. It works out for us, so I say do what works for you :goodvibes
 
I Love Pluto said:
I was a SAHM for 13 years. I LOVED "being there" for my kids & hubby. I would NEVER have traded those years for all the money in the world!

WHY do I know that this was a good choice for us? Because - both of my adult kids (30 & 32) have thanked me for "being there" for them. They respected my DH's and my decision to raise them as WE felt we should. Do not listen to others - your decisions are just that - YOURS!

Now - we have an "odd couple" switch. (I am 60, DH is 63.) For the last four years, HE has run the house, done all the errands, etc, etc, while I continue to work. It is HEAVEN! I really do enjoy the "no housework for me" thing. Everything is done for me. All I do is go to work. Life is good.

So - enjoy your SAH status. Life changes too quickly. We're here to do what we feel is right.

(OK - I'll get off my soapbox now!) :blush:

Funny, but I have thanked my mom for the very same 'being there' and she was a single mom who worked 2 jobs and then did the books for another business while she was home to make ends meet.

Good for all of you that are happy with being home. I am happy with working and paying someone else to scrub the floors, the toilets and mow the lawn. My DH is pretty darn spoiled himself - if he needs new clothes then I go get them with the kids on one of our 'at home' days (I work 3 days and will be working 2 come 2007) and he tries them on and I return what he doesn't like!

Do what is right for your family, I agree, and for us we are lucky enough that I have a rewarding career in a flexible field. I actually think that I do make a difference in other people's lives when I am at work, and it is important for me to do that and that my kids see me doing that.

I'm sorry to come in and butt in on the thread, but I just had to say that 'being there' for your kids is important, but please don't discount that there are working moms who are there for their kids in every way that is important! And I mean my mom here, not me! She worked and raised us and both my sister and I have turned out pretty darn good (if we say so ourselves!) so my soapbox is to not discount her parenting, or that of other working moms just because you choose and have the luxury of staying home.

Sorry, I will leave you alone now :blush:
 
Great to hear about people who have their priorities in order. You and your DH should be proud that you put your families needs and happiness before the all mighty $!
:thumbsup2
 
sara74 said:
I'm sorry to come in and butt in on the thread, but I just had to say that 'being there' for your kids is important, but please don't discount that there are working moms who are there for their kids in every way that is important!

I don't think anyone here has *discounted* the working mom who feels they are doing what is right for their kids. Listen to this scenario, if you will:

I have a friend who has 7 children, homeschools, is a published author, speaker and hosts the local morning show. She is beautiful, smart, articulate, incredibly funny and can sing!!!! Hello, could one person have too many talents? I think so :rotfl2: At the end of the day, she never wants to be away from her children. NEVER. If she is given 30 minutes to do whatever she wants, she wants her kids. If she is going to the store, she takes kids with her. She also never wants to be away from her husband (who works at home). *Now*- I think it's healthy to have a break. I think I am a better mom and wife when I get some time for myself. *She* thinks she does a better job and is more fulfilled the *more* she time she spends with them. She actually feels guilty if she isn't around. There was a time when us (girlfriends) felt like she looked down on us because we didn't share our bed with all of our children, and we didn't *want* to spend every single waking hour surrounded by our little angels. :teeth: Over time we have come to realize and respect that she is crazy :lmao: :rotfl2: :lmao: JUST KIDDING.

We have come to realize that we are different. :goodvibes What she feels about how she is raising her kids is different than how we feel. She could *never* ever take a weekend away from her kids with a group of friends. She doesn't *discount* that it is effective for us but she doesn't think it is right for her.

Working mothers are doing their jobs both at home and away from home differently but not necessarily better or worse, K? I am certain there are benefits but for me I would feel absolute misery (like my friend) if I did things differently. There are SAHM's who feel judgemental (as there are those who work that do the same ;) ) Don't lump all those types here, because I think the posts on this thread talk about the *personal* feelings of staying home and not how the others are wrong and making a mistake. :confused3
 
sara74 said:
Funny, but I have thanked my mom for the very same 'being there' and she was a single mom who worked 2 jobs and then did the books for another business while she was home to make ends meet.

Good for all of you that are happy with being home. I am happy with working and paying someone else to scrub the floors, the toilets and mow the lawn. My DH is pretty darn spoiled himself - if he needs new clothes then I go get them with the kids on one of our 'at home' days (I work 3 days and will be working 2 come 2007) and he tries them on and I return what he doesn't like!

Do what is right for your family, I agree, and for us we are lucky enough that I have a rewarding career in a flexible field. I actually think that I do make a difference in other people's lives when I am at work, and it is important for me to do that and that my kids see me doing that.

I'm sorry to come in and butt in on the thread, but I just had to say that 'being there' for your kids is important, but please don't discount that there are working moms who are there for their kids in every way that is important! And I mean my mom here, not me! She worked and raised us and both my sister and I have turned out pretty darn good (if we say so ourselves!) so my soapbox is to not discount her parenting, or that of other working moms just because you choose and have the luxury of staying home.

Sorry, I will leave you alone now :blush:

The poster you quoted must have said 10 times that she did what was best for HER family, that is was THEIR choice, that it was a PERSONAL choice, and so on. Why jump on her for stating HER opinion? My mom worked her butt off too when I was growing up but I would have given my left arm for her to be a SAHM. I appreciate she worked to support us but secretly wished we had enough money so that she would be there for me when I came home from school like other friends' moms did. I would have loved, loved, loved, to have my mom physically there instead of having to wait til she got him at 5:30. Because of this I made sure that I would be there for MY children. I made sure that MY children would never secretly wish I stayed home with them. Fortunately my children never want for anything with me being a SAHM because my DH has a great job. I also had maid to come in and clean every Friday and I am a SAHM. You don't have to have to be a SAHM and do all the cleaning too!
 
I recently had some one ask me if I liked being a nurse, to which I replied "I really enjoy being a retired nurse." I was partly kidding, but I do not have any plans to return to nursing in the near future.

I considered being the school nurse at my girls private school this school year, but quickly found out that I am not ready to work again right now.

My DH is a self-employed contractor. Our office manager was involved in a terrible accident in April, and I was able to step in and take over his job. I worked on the phone and with paperwork while in the carpool line, and in the office the 2 days my youngest was in preschool. I am not sure what DH would have done if I was working, as he desperately needed me. We are not sure if the OM will be able to come back to work in his original capacity, due to his brain injury, so I may have to help out again in the future. But DH will work around my schedule with the girls, and it will not be permanent.
 















Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE







New Posts







DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Back
Top