My question is for those who are vehemently against them and say consistency and consequence are the solution. I've seen PPs ask this too but I haven't seen an answer. If someone has answered it, I apologize.
Do you have locks on your cabinets to keep your toddler away from the chemicals under the sink? How about a baby gate at the top/bottom of your stairs? How about a fence around your pool?
If so why aren't these things considered "lazy" parenting. As you've stated consistency and consequence are the solution. Using your argument all an engaged parent would need to do is instruct their children to stay away from said cabinets/stairs/pools and do so consistently on order to keep their child safe.
Now, I'm not arguing that consistency and consequence are not key concepts when working with children in any capacity. However, it often takes more than a few times in order for the child to "get it" especially at a young age. Why is it so wrong to use a back up method, like a leash/reigns/tether until they understand like you would a cabinet lock, gate or fence?
You know, I've tried to ask similar questions several times with different examples on this thread and they get shot down as being "apples to oranges"

I have no idea why putting a fence around a pool would be good parenting yet attaching your child to a leash while in a crowded area is "lazy" (in case they haven't mastered walking like an adult yet)?? if you ask me, all these things are extra safety measures to help the parent have peace of mind. Once again....since these examples are clearly not "apples to oranges" and rather "apples to apples" than I stand by my theory that people are just hung up on leashes because they "look" like dog leashes and that just freaks them all out. They DO look like dog leashes but who cares!
I'm sure there's one or two posters here (not going to name any names) that think I'm sticking up for the "leashers" because I'm a lazy parent and take vacations from parenting when on vacation. No...i'm just realistic and am trying to get the point across that it's really ok to snap a leash on your kid while at a mega crowded park if it helps you relax a little and be able to enjoy yourself versus having to hold a sweaty hand all day. If there is a product out there that DOESN'T HURT THE CHILD, DOESN'T DISRUPT OTHER GUESTS, and MAKES YOUR LIFE A LITTLE EASIER than why be so ashamed to use it? It's almost like the anti-leashers want to do things the harder way to earn some sort of parenting badge. It really is quite odd


There's a million apparatuses sold at Baby'sRus that help provide safety and PEACE OF MIND TO "LAZY PARENTS" such lifejackets, safety locks, baby gates, baby monitors, child proof medicine bottles.....oh and just send your toddler out the front door to ride their tricycle while you watch tv because "if they were disciplined they wouldn't be running out in the street". And if you were truly good at discipline you would have no need to put your meds up high and out of the way because your kid KNOWS BETTER than to get into them because you are a "consistent disciplinarian"

puuuuleeeze!
ok, I'm getting kind of tired of this thread and it's really quite petty anyway. My kids are 12 and 15 so it really doesn't apply to me. I've never used a leash and I actually never even needed baby gates or child locks either. Not because I rock at being good with discipline but because my kids were timid and clingy and sort of little "sissies". BUT....I would never judge and jump to the conclusion that a parent is lazy for using a leash. I would see one and think "ah, clever idea, kid seems happier than being tied into stroller and mom and dad can chat and be adults since they have peace of mind". I'd also think to myself, "glad my kids aren't the kind to run off since they are so clingy but not everybody has clingy scaredy-cat kids so I totally get it". I mean do you really think they tie this kid up at home and walk him around their neighborhood on a leash?! (and if you do, you'd be on
youtube
) of course not, they probably just whipped it out at WDW because the place is freakin' crowded. duh. Said parents might actually want to be able to "relax" just a bit on vacation and probably have every intention on getting back to working on discipling the kid to walk in crowded places once they get back home and they are not in such an overwhelming venue.