We are, also, just going to have to agree to disagree because no matter how you try to explain it...I don't agree with you. I honestly believe that if it inconvenienced you, you wouldn't believe in it and it's consequences. It's easy to support something that you believe has no real negative impact on you or those you love
There are lots of ways to teach personal responsiblity and I, as well as a lot of others, don't believe that this is a reasonable way to teach it. That's really the bottom line here.
And I also that it's unfortunate when someone's personal hot buttons get in the way of participating in a reasoned discussion. The reference to all these people who think they should be excluded from the rules while everyone else should have to follow them? Please point out those posts........ because I don't see that here. I just see people doing a lot of venting about the stupidity of some rules and saying that they should not exist for anyone, period.
ETA: and the fact that someone would so proudly admit to being condescending (and with a thumbsup to boot) is really kind of sad. Behavior to be proud of? YikesI'd be much more concerned about the child of that parent than the child of the parent who wants to be sure he/she eats lunch.
Read the thread, there have been posters here who have said they have or would break that particular rule.
And what's sad is if I came here and said "I wasn't being condescending, I only meant this but it didn't come out right, or some other excuse. I'm not going to hide behind excuses, I'll stand behind what I say here, especially when I think it deserves to be said. Your previous posts insinuates that its a shame parents don't come out and speak out about a rule because in your mind its just not inconvenient enough for them to care. How could it be that we may agree with the prinicple of the rule when its not something you do? Talk about a condescending attitude
