WWYD?? I don't think I am in the wrong!

NEVERENOUGHWDW, I don't think empowering your children is equal "using them as weapons" or "having them do the OP's dirty work".

Teaching your children how to respond to their controlling father is necessary for them for the rest of their life.

Now if she needs to seek a counselor to get appropriate info, that is not a bad idea.

In this case there is no "right thing" and that is where you get lost on what to do.
 
I think your DH responded best. He told your ex that any communication between you and the ex will have to be in writing. Obviously the ex can't have a conversation without becoming emotional, therefore all conversations must be in writing until he CAN control his emotions. I'd recommend sending the ex an email telling him that you've chosen this route because of his inability to control himself when he's on the phone. That way you're covered should a judge ask why you cut off communication.

As for your daughters always having to listen to their Dad's money problems, perhaps emails might be best for their communications as well. Again, the kids would have to detail in their first email why they are choosing this method so if a judge asks at a later date why this happened, they can provide evidence that they requested this venue. .

So it is WWYD?

Well first I would empower my dd's and teach them how to navigate out of a "rant" conversation. When their dad starts in with the money, I would practice canned answers...like, "Dad if you cannot talk to me about me, then I have nothing more to say to you. I am hanging up now."
(or something to that effect)

Try and keep it to emails, however that is just not going to be possible all of the time.
.

Both of the above are excellent suggestions.. :goodvibes
 
NEVERENOUGHWDW, I don't think empowering your children is equal "using them as weapons" or "having them do the OP's dirty work".

Teaching your children how to respond to their controlling father is necessary for them for the rest of their life.

Now if she needs to seek a counselor to get appropriate info, that is not a bad idea.
.

I agree empowering is a good thing. I don't agree with having the kids tell their father that Mom will call back or isn't available. That should be out of the adults mouth.
 
:hug: Lots of great advice.

Can you just let him call when he wants to talk to the girls? Do they have to call him (court stuff)? I'd let sleeping dogs lie. At some point, it would seem that the relationship is detrimental to the kids and the resolve to that shouldn't hinge on child support.

Even though you hope your ex will change and want a positive relationship with his kids, he has big issues. I'd gather evidence that he is hurting the kids with his badgering and ask the lawyer how much of this should the kids have to endure. Seriously. His issues shouldn't be the kids issues.

It would probably make your DH spontaneously combust if he had to pay child support and couldn't keep targeting them and you with his rantings. But what he is doing is not right. Someway, I'd put a stop to it.
 

I'd be getting my children some professional help in dealing with their crazy father. For myself, I'd just get down on my knees and thank my lucky stars(or whomever you pray to) that he was my EX. Don't take his calls - ever. Get a mediator if you need to. No one should have to listen to his insane threats and ramblings. Again, I'd get my kids professional help.
 
I agree empowering is a good thing. I don't agree with having the kids tell their father that Mom will call back or isn't available. That should be out of the adults mouth.

Yes, but you have to give your kid a canned response when the dad starts going on his crazy rants demanding their mom.

It is really sick because in that moment he is acting like they are a family and reeling in the kids that way to get to the mother.

I do understand what you are saying however. I just don't know what the right action would be, you know?

Neither is good.:sad2:
 
I would have no problem giving up child support to get him out of my life but I have to be fair to the girls. I still have that hope that he will get over his money issues with me and see how wonderful they are before its too late.

I've never been in this situation, so I hope someone who has can help me understand. First, we're not sure if your ex would sign away his legal rights to his daughters. But, if he would do so to end the child support, then couldn't you still encourage the girls to maintain a relationship with him since they know he's their real dad, etc., and yet you'd be in the position to limit it if it got abusive for them? From where I'm sitting, that would be in the best interest of the girls. The ex not having the money issue any longer might make him focus more on them and less on you, but if he still persisted, they could more easily say "No, Dad, we don't want to talk to you" and not have to as there would no longer be a court order.

Also, they're young now -- but they will get older. Many people who have grown up in adopted families have gone to search out their "birth parents" and developed relationships with them as adults. Some people honestly don't handle children well. So it's possible that your ex might interact great with them when they're all grown, but not so well with them now. Wouldn't it be in their best interest to remove the stress of interacting with him when he acts the way he does now?

You said, "I still have that hope that he will get over his money issues with me and see how wonderful they are before its too late." You say you want *him* to see how wonderful his daughters are, but you can't make that happen. If he's willing to sign away his rights, though, you *can* ensure that the rest of Remy and Holly's childhoods are free from the anxiety and tears that these interactions with him cause.

The way he's focusing on the money makes me honestly believe that if you offered to have him not pay another dime, he'd take you up on that and sign away his rights to the girls. That doesn't mean you would have to forbid them from seeing him if they wanted to see him, but it would remove money from the equation. They could then interact with him only when they wanted to, not when a court said they had to. And you and your girls would then both see what, if any, time and/or money he chose to spend on them simply because he loved them. Remember, "The love of money is the root of all evil" (1 Timothy 6:10) It does seem to be what he is obsessing about.

-Dorothy (LadyZolt)
 
Lastly, give your DH an extra hug and kiss. He sounds like a really special guy.

Absolutely.

When my dad got all "my dad-ish" in the presence of my mom and first stepdad, step blew up so out of control that I tried to run away. It was horrible. He was trying to protect her, but my dad wasn't doing anything threatening at that time; stepdad was a couple years too late for the violence. Stepdad made it so so so so much worse, but then the story made it to second stepdad (good solid guy at long last for my mom) and he treated my dad even worse, if possible, over things LONG since done, than first stepdad.

My dad wasn't in the right at all. He felt that he should have a say in where child support went or he wasn't going to pay it...he wanted it to go to college fund...my mom explained that stepdad shouldn't have to pay for a father's share of things, and that we needed shoes and clothes and such NOW, and that's where child support went...ended up, after the blow up, with NO money. No child support, no college fund. Yay.

What was it about this jerk that attracted you to him in the first place? I never understand when I read these stories about awful ex-husbands... were they sterling, upstanding men before the wedding? Did they turn into ******** only afterwards? How can I help my daughters choose husbands wisely?

Just my answer, ignore if you only wanted OP's...Freud had something with the electra, looking for daddy, stuff. I looked for the feeling of mom and dad's, and later mom and first stepdad's, relationships (if you can call it that) for years. It wasn't a relationship if it wasn't *charged*. If I wasn't unsure at ALL times if he liked me (forget love!). If we weren't routinely breaking up and making up. "Nice guys" always adored me...I ignored them. Or I wouldn't talk about feelings with the nice guys until it was too late, they thought I wasn't serious, and they'd moved on to the next girl who did like them and would tell them they liked them. wash, rinse, repeat.

And even after I figured that out (reading Adult Children of Alcoholics helped IMMENSELY) it took a good while for my habits to change. And when I finally found a good nice guy, I stuck around! And talked feelings etc, and all those really uncomfortable things. :3dglasses

My dad...stood up my mom on their first date. They were, oh, 15 and 17 at the time, I believe. My dad looked like James Dean (who was already dead by that time) and was ridiculously good looking. He had this sort of tucked in, but strong (not weasely), chin that my brother had (and orthodontists tried to correct it) that caused swooning in women of his age. They met and were separated by fate, and fought to get back to each other. (seriously, there's a reason why Romeo and Juliet end up dead...15 year olds in way over their heads...) My mom, at the time, just wanted to get out of the house...her father woudln't let her do so alone...he and my dad had a closed-door meeting where it was decided that he and my mom would marry. So they did, and moved to SF in the early 60s. She was 17, dad was 19 (they had me 8 years later) A few years after they married, he got mean. And it got worse and worse. My mom said she should have known, since he had stood her up.

In the years before she died, she had some memories come to the surface. My aunt, her sister, refused to believe them, saying that someone had planted them in her head. My mom hadn't had any therapy; she believed them firmly. Memories of her father being extremely abusive to her in the relatively short time she lived at home. I mean, really really abusive.

Again, searching for daddy by marrying who she married.


So IMO if you don't have a dad like that to begin with, and I'm going by the patterns of my girlfriends (most of whom were from nice, calm, intact homes) too here, there's not as much to worry about. But if there's a live-wire dad around...it can get weird.

Lesson learned at long last....Nice guys are nice. :)

Fl state guidelines determine the support amount and we can NOT lower it because it is for the children and Fl state wants to make sure they get what the girls need, not make life easier for the parents. We have been to court over twenty times in the last three years regarding his wanting to lower child support and it is dismissed every time.

I have had both girls in therapy several years (since the beginning of the divorce) but it doesn't seem to be able to make headway with that fear.

I know it sounds stupid but I grew up in an abusive household with a single mom and a series of stepdads and my moms boyfriends that werent the nicest ppl and didn't think the ex was like this until after we were married and had Remy...by that time I felt stuck and didn't see how I could get out of the situation..I actually left for over a year when Remy was two, but somehow got sucked back in thinking he had changed..which he did for a year or two...then when he was deployed several times he became really bad and had me convinced I was worthless, stupid, and that he would get custody of the girls if I left since I had no job at that time and no resourses...it took a long time (and therapy) to see I was a capable woman and was NOT worthless...now I can't understand how I was so dumb..hindsight I guess.

It's so sad he can't see that it's the law and that's it. He's banging his head against the wall trying to get it lowered...that's just so awful.
******
Fear of being in trouble from absent (no matter how good a reason for the absence!) father is a big big fear. It was so deep set in me that on one trip to my mom and second stepdad's home, when I was in grad school, my mom and I started bickering (as we had always done), I said something that ticked off my stepdad (he had never seen us bicker, I guess), and he started "talking loud" to me...I ran upstairs and became hysterical, hyperventilating for WAY too long...just b/c I was yelled at by a father-figure. I can't take it.

Even now, if hubby and I have some stupid argument (and this was especially so in the year leading up to blood sugar problems were diagnosed and he changed his diet to keep them lower and more level) and he raises his voice, I will start freaking out. Thankfully I don't just let whatever it was go, but I do communicate the fear I'm feeling, and we can continue on working through the problem instead of just yelling at the problem.

Anyway, fear of loss of father's love is a big one. I lost that after 30 (when my mom died), and especially lost it back in '07 when I had it out with him about use of certain language in front of my son. That is WAY too long; I encourage trying to help them through that by a much younger age! :hug:
*******
It doesn't sound stupid at all, hon. It sounds very common, and it happens often.

My MIL never did leave her husband, even after her 3 children got old enough to start *begging* her to leave their father. But she didn't have citizenship (b/c she wanted to make sure she could flee quickly back to Korea, just in case...the logic fails there with what comes next in the story, but that was her story), not until she was nearly 70, and FIL would threaten her with taking and keeping the children, and that she would NEVER see them again. He would gather them together and tell them to say goodbye to their mother...that she was leaving them...that she loved Korea more than them... She never left him. And I should mention that my BIL is 9 years older than my DH (who is 2 years older than their sister), so it's not like he was only doing this with infants.

She finally started thinking about divorce...just as he got sick for the last time...and now she feels she caused his death b/c she told him she was going to leave him.

So what you went through isn't stupid. You got out. You were strong, even if strength took awhile to get fully instilled.


I agree empowering is a good thing. I don't agree with having the kids tell their father that Mom will call back or isn't available. That should be out of the adults mouth.

But if he is saying these things to his daughters...what are they to do? Give her the phone? If so, then he says "tell your mother to get her butt on the phone", and...she does it. That is NOT good. It's not good for him to feel he's gotten his way, it's not good for the OP to maybe feel she's given in, and it's absolutely not good for what her daughters might take away from it.

So what should their daughters say to him?

It took me to my mid/late 20s to stop being a go-between. It took longer to stop being a go-between between dad and my brother. These girls are far younger than that. It might be beyond them to say "I'm not a go-between, I can't talk about this with you."

Then again, perhaps they could just not hear him and end the call as they would normally..."bye, love you (if they say that...I said it to my dad while never saying it to my mom even though I felt it for my mom), school day tomorrow, goodnight!"...then just hang up. Might be a solution. Maybe.


But, if he would do so to end the child support, then couldn't you still encourage the girls to maintain a relationship with him since they know he's their real dad, etc., and yet you'd be in the position to limit it if it got abusive for them?

If he's willing to sign away his rights, though, you *can* ensure that the rest of Remy and Holly's childhoods are free from the anxiety and tears that these interactions with him cause.

When first stepdad was around, before he showed his own true colors to my mom, there was discussion of this in our household. So from my very shaky knowledge of it, giving up parental rights means walking away. It means opening the door for OP's current husband to adopt the girls. It's not just a way to stop the money flow.

And...as someone who, as a kid, wouldn't have mind having the stepdad as a dad...if my dad had agreed...it would have devastated my already routinely broken heart. It would have killed a part of me, to have him agree.

But I am often much more sensitive than others so that might just be me.

Though my brother, at my wedding, heard our dad introduce one of our half-brothers, his third child and second son, as his oldest son. What's worse, it was to people that knew better. And my brother, at 31, finally, at long last, emotionally wrote off my dad entirely. What he heard was not so different than signing papers giving up rights...




OP I feel for you! I wish my mom were still around, she might have words for you to help. She watched my dad play me like a top for years. It was only distance and age that started to help. But then again, she was mired in simply surviving for SO long that there was no money, no help, for any sort of counseling. ...interestingly, it was my own dad who paid for my anger management counseling which morphed into general counseling, when I tried to beat up a boyfriend who was being horrible to me...it was as close to an apology, for setting up those responses, as I feel I'll ever get from him.... Since your girls have been in counseling, I think they stand a really good chance at dealing with all of this and being as minimally a/effected (?) as possible.

Now go relax!
 
I don't think the ex-husband has a right to harass the kids about child support just because he's supposed to be paying it. That seems to be his mindset. Maybe after some documentation (detailing his harassment) is given to your lawyer he can be given some "guidelines" by the court.

Wouldn't it be cosmic justice if he had to pay a fine for every time he harassed the kids about it?
 
What was it about this jerk that attracted you to him in the first place? I never understand when I read these stories about awful ex-husbands... were they sterling, upstanding men before the wedding? Did they turn into ******** only afterwards? How can I help my daughters choose husbands wisely?

I wish you all the best. I hope that your sweet little girls are able to have as little contact with this guy as possible.

As a divorced parent, I can assure that I did not, nor I am sure the OP did not, set out to choose someone who would be a controlling, jealous, abusive moron. How dare you assume that anyone chooses "unwisely" and sets their children up for that kind of abuse?

And yes, sometimes men do present a good front, or change *gasp* during the course of a relationship. Years go by, people want different things, and usually when the relationship ended on a sour note ( which most do ) and they are angry that they are a large part of the reason it ended, they become jealous, angry, and abusive.

Want my ex-husbands number? You can give him a call. He cheated and hit me, and is one of the most bitter men you'll ever meet. And he can show you a picture of his new baby and tell you how he mucked up that relationship because he refuses to commit to anyone because he wrongly thinks one day we'll get back together.

So no, we do not pick out the jerkiest guy in the room and go "Hey, let's have some kids!" nor can you determine how someone will change or react to any situation. Think Lacey Peterson married Scott Peterson knowing he'd do what he did? Pretty sure not. Be careful getting off that high horse.
 
I agree empowering is a good thing. I don't agree with having the kids tell their father that Mom will call back or isn't available. That should be out of the adults mouth.

But, sometimes they have to be able to give him an answer of some sort. The OP talking to him is useless. The kids need to be able say "mom said to email her" or "you can't talk to her right now". Otherwise they are just sitting in the middle with dad demanding to speak to her and her saying no.

I do think that she or her dh should be standing right there and if the ex continues to demand to speak with her, they should take the phone and simply state, "this conversation is over. If you want to talk to your daughters you can, but only about them and their lives. you can call back when you are ready to do that. If you want to talk to me, then you know that we are only communicating through email." and then hang up.
 
But, sometimes they have to be able to give him an answer of some sort. The OP talking to him is useless. The kids need to be able say "mom said to email her" or "you can't talk to her right now". Otherwise they are just sitting in the middle with dad demanding to speak to her and her saying no.

I do think that she or her dh should be standing right there and if the ex continues to demand to speak with her, they should take the phone and simply state, "this conversation is over. If you want to talk to your daughters you can, but only about them and their lives. you can call back when you are ready to do that. If you want to talk to me, then you know that we are only communicating through email." and then hang up.

I think I have it.

How about you teach the kid to say...."OK" ?

The dad starts in with put your mom on the phone, then the child says OK and puts the phone down instead of hanging up.

Gives the kids an immediate "out" and then the OP can decide to pick up the phone and take it from there.
 
The best gift my 2nd hubby ever taught me was HOW TO HANG UP THE PHONE on my ex. :lmao:


Don't put the kids in the middle by asking them to hang up--take the phone yourself and hang it up. You can say 'I said email" "Email" or nothing at all --whatever---but don't make it the girls responsibility to referee between you. And yes they are acting like referees if you have them hang the phone up---they are actually separating the boxers and sending them to their respective corners.;)


Now-some states are what they call "one party consent" states--that means only ONE person involved in the phone call needs to consent to taping the call (DUH--that would be the person doing the taping). If your cell phone has record on it, record his phone calls with the girls (letting them know and as you are the custodial parent you are giving consent on their behalf). Let them tell their dad if they want to--don't ask them to "hide it". If your cell phone can't record check radio Shack--they used to have that type of equipment.

Email is fine but if you ever want to cut off his contact with the girls due to his total lack of concern for them and their lives then you have something to go to court with. Emails are fine but the tone of a voice can say so much more. (A good lawyer can argue that 'tone" can be "misconstrued" in the written word--especially if he is smart enough to throw in some LOL, smilies, etc. type language to make it "look" like a joke).

Were either of you required to take some type of divorcing parents seminar? They talk about situations like this--the message is usually not heard but ......
 
I know that I should expect nasty remarks, by this stage I am used to them. I am just tired of getting into pointless arguements and want to have records from now on for court purposes. I would have to say that roughly 97% off all convos with the ex regard his feelings on paying too much in child support. I would be more sympathetic to this if he didn't make almost 5K a month and have a new house, two new vehicles (both over 30K each) as well as being otherwise financially stable. The truth is he feels like he is giving ME money for nothing instead of in reality paying part of the girls living expenses. The court also says I pay the same amount in support, but of course it is paid to "myself" for their upkeep. Fl state guidelines determine the support amount and we can NOT lower it because it is for the children and Fl state wants to make sure they get what the girls need, not make life easier for the parents. We have been to court over twenty times in the last three years regarding his wanting to lower child support and it is dismissed every time. Acutally we are scheduled to return to court for the same issue sometimes soon (just got the papers served, no court date yet sigh). I would also like to make sure that everyone understands that I get NO money in addition to the child support, I pay OOP for all extras the girls need like school clothes, school fees, activities (for which I go without luxuries to be able to afford to give them..by luxuries I mean cable, clothes for myself, any going out, treats, etc), field trips, etc. Unfortunately we do need the cell since we turned off our regular phone (the cell costs us 28/a mo less which may not seem like alot but to us it is).

$5K per month is a $60K job. That is not poverty level but it certainly is not living the high life. It seems he got in over his head on purchases, cars and home, and is really hurting WRT cash flow. That is not the kids problem but his problem. He needs to solve his financial problem.

If you are allotted 1/2 of the kids support and they live with you then you must be making good money.
 
Don't put the kids in the middle by asking them to hang up--take the phone yourself and hang it up. You can say 'I said email" "Email" or nothing at all --whatever---but don't make it the girls responsibility to referee between you. And yes they are acting like referees if you have them hang the phone up---they are actually separating the boxers and sending them to their respective corners.;)


......

Agreed. It's really cruel to the girls to ask them to relay message from you (meaning having them say "Mommy told you to email.") It puts them more in the middle then they already are. You are the grown up, so take the phone when he asks to talk to you and say, "Ex, if you would like to talk to me, then email me, if you want to talk to the girls, I will put them on the phone. If not, then I am hanging up now." It's not Remy and Holly's job to buffer you from him.
 
I've never been in this situation, so I hope someone who has can help me understand. First, we're not sure if your ex would sign away his legal rights to his daughters. But, if he would do so to end the child support, then couldn't you still encourage the girls to maintain a relationship with him since they know he's their real dad, etc., and yet you'd be in the position to limit it if it got abusive for them? From where I'm sitting, that would be in the best interest of the girls. The ex not having the money issue any longer might make him focus more on them and less on you, but if he still persisted, they could more easily say "No, Dad, we don't want to talk to you" and not have to as there would no longer be a court order.

-Dorothy (LadyZolt)
I agree with this completely. If his only conversation with them is about the money he pays to you, then it seems that it's in the best interest of the girls to remedy that situation by cutting off all ties. It appears, based on your posts, that this behavior has been going on for a long time and isn't going to stop anytime soon.

I would have to say that roughly 97% off all convos with the ex regard his feelings on paying too much in child support.

I would have no problem giving up child support to get him out of my life but I have to be fair to the girls. I still have that hope that he will get over his money issues with me and see how wonderful they are before its too late.
LadyZolt touched on this and, once again, I have to agree with her. It's not fair to your girls that they are forced to carry on 97% of their conversations with their biological father talking about the money he pays to you. Not when you have in your hands the ability to end this kind of torture for them by proposing he terminate his rights and end those support payments.

You can't force him to "see how wonderful they are". Obviously, with 97% of the phone calls turning into support payment arguments, he's not going to be seeing that for a very long time. Your job now is to watch out of the well-being of your girls. If their conversations with their biological father are putting them into therapy, maybe you need to find a way for those conversations to stop.

You're going to have to choose between money and your daughter's well-being. Yes, it's a bad decision to try to make, but life isn't fair.
 
You're going to have to choose between money and your daughter's well-being. Yes, it's a bad decision to try to make, but life isn't fair.

I don't know. Does his detrimental behavior absolve him from his responsibility to his kids?
 
I don't know. Does his detrimental behavior absolve him from his responsibility to his kids?
If you had an ex-husband who was sexually abusive to your children, you'd remove them from his presence, right? In this case, there's a man who is psychologically abusive by continuing to make his girls cry whenever he gets on the phone with them. This apparently isn't going to stop.

The OP hasn't said it's about the money - she's stated that she wants her ex to recognize her daughters as being wonderful. This isn't going to happen. She now has to decide if she wants his money more than she wants the psychological well-being of her girls.

To say that it's unfair to the children to deny them some kind of "birthright" by bankrupting their father, then to force them to interact with someone they'd rather not interact with....well, I doubt they really care about giving up their "birthright" of cash so they can enjoy their "birthright" of not being tortured every week of the year until they're 18 and can put a stop to it.

Maybe it comes down to that saying:

When people say it's not the money, it's the principle of the thing, they're lying. It's always about the money.
 
I feel for you and the girls. I had this issue, but on some great advice found a way to fix my situation that might be helpful to you. I explicity warned my ex that I would no longer fight with him, that I would no longer discuss money issues with him. That his phone calls were for him to get know what is going on with his children who do no in any way deal with financial things in my home.

The very next time he called I immediately answered the phone, said hi ex, here are the kids I need to get in the shower. I went in the bathroom and turned on the cold water and stayed there. The first couple times he asked to speak with me, the children were able to say she is in the bathroom...she is in the yard mowing..whatever excuse there was. I removed myself from the vicinity. The kids weren't lying, they weren't being held hostage. Took about 4 phone calls but guess what he learned I wasn't going to speak to him..PERIOD.

If he continues to speak to the kids about financial things I would immediately consult an attorney and have a very nice letter drawn up. Letting him know that these issues are NOT kid related, what his phone calls are to be about and send that certified/signature receivable. Your lawyer can also include your email account as the place he is to send any adult discussion with you and it is not OPTIONAL. At this point I would start documenting. There is no way I would give him a free pass on the c/s. Your girls deserve what they deserve. If he has issues with the amount the proper place to discuss that is with a lawyer and the courthouse. Your lawyer can also include that in his letter to him.

I really feel that sometimes in the ex situation we get tangled up so much in the negative we let it go on too long. The behavior becomes a habit. Now he needs to understand, you need to teach him, you are breaking the habit. Whether he understands that or not, it will NOT change. The rollercoaster is stopped on the negative behavior.

Kelly
 
If you had an ex-husband who was sexually abusive to your children, you'd remove them from his presence, right? In this case, there's a man who is psychologically abusive by continuing to make his girls cry whenever he gets on the phone with them. This apparently isn't going to stop.

The OP hasn't said it's about the money - she's stated that she wants her ex to recognize her daughters as being wonderful. This isn't going to happen. She now has to decide if she wants his money more than she wants the psychological well-being of her girls.

To say that it's unfair to the children to deny them some kind of "birthright" by bankrupting their father, then to force them to interact with someone they'd rather not interact with....well, I doubt they really care about giving up their "birthright" of cash so they can enjoy their "birthright" of not being tortured every week of the year until they're 18 and can put a stop to it.

Maybe it comes down to that saying:

When people say it's not the money, it's the principle of the thing, they're lying. It's always about the money.

I agree his harassment isn't going to stop without legal help.

My point is maybe the courts will uphold his child support and tell him to cease the harassment. If he doesn't cease the harassment he should still have to pay child support without visitation.

ETA- I don't know, but I *think* the OP needs the money for the kids. I don't think it's a luxury. Also, as far as bankrupting the birth father, he has done it to himself with the extravagant purchases and is taking it out on the kids. Sad situation. But he has a responsibility.
 





New Posts








Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE













DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter DIS Bluesky

Back
Top