quentina
<font color=deeppink>The bridge has been built and
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2004
- Messages
- 2,173
Disney - Universal Studios!![]()
UHHH, I fear the end of the $99.00, 7 day pass...
Disney - Universal Studios!![]()
I strongly disagree.
If Universal, Gatorland, and all the attractions in Orlando went out-of-business, Disney would still be a huge a vacation-spot as ever. I don't believe that Disney is working to "promote the community". It doesn't need to. It doesn't need "the community". I've been to WDW many many times and have never set foot in an establishment other than Disney while there, except for MCO. None of my friends have ever gone offsite when being in WDW.
I don't think Disney and Universal are "enemies". What I do believe is that Disney knows it has the economic upper-hand, the popularity upper-hand, and it'll do whatever it takes to make it grow. They aren't singing kumbaya with Universal.
MTE
Could Disney survive without the others? Probably, but that doesn't mean that they are out to bring the other parks down. That isn't the way it works here.
And Feralpeg is right, there is not a lot of animosity between Disney and Universal. Heck, I worked with quite a few CMs who were Team Members at Universal.
Could Disney survive without the others? You say probably. I say absolutely.
And who said they are out to bring the other parks down?? Why the exaggeration? I said Disney is a business. Universal is a business. They are owned by separate entities that want to succeed and make money. They don't sit around discussing how to join together to promote the community. If it weren't for WDW, the Orlando area would not be a MAJOR tourist attraction, the top family vacation destination in the world. People don't come over from Brazil, Japan and the UK to visit Gatorland.
I never thought there was animosity between Disney CMs and Universal TMs. But I do believe there is competition between the two companies.
Anyone remember the Universal TV commercials that said something like "when you've had enough fairy tales and pixie dust..."?
There is competition. They both want to make money, but it isn't a nasty competition.
Just to clarify something, I just heard on the news that Disney announced that Universal has the rights to the Marvel characters for as long as they want. They did say that Disney plans to use some of the characters at their parks as well to appeal to boys.
We agree.
I wonder why Disney didn't find some other way to appeal to the teen boy demographic. I can't seem to separate Universal and Marval in my mind!
The article below answers a lot of questions-
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/business/orl-bk-disney-marvel-entertainment-083109,0,2559631.story
Just to be clear: I believe that Universal has perpetual rights to two Marvel characters (really two sets of characters), Spiderman and Hulk, and only has those rights east of the Mississippi. I suspect that they have rights to other characters on a term basis. Either way, continued usage of these characters by Universal would benefit Disney, since FWIR Universal pays a percentage of ticket revenues as long as the attractions remain in place, and I would guess that they pay a fee for usage of other characters.Just to clarify something, I just heard on the news that Disney announced that Universal has the rights to the Marvel characters for as long as they want. They did say that Disney plans to use some of the characters at their parks as well to appeal to boys.
Along those lines, even though Universal has the rights to continuing using Hulk as the theme of its entry roller coaster, I thought I read a rumor that they were thinking of redressing the roller coaster to be an entry to the new Harry Potter attraction area....
Spidermickey
Spidermickey
does what ever spider can
I wouldn't worry too much - pretty often, when a company acquires another company, they don't mess too much with a proven formula.
Disney does film and merchandising well - owning Marvel properties was probably the driving factor, not remaking them. Recall that Warner Brothers bought DC some years ago, and if there were any major changes, they were invisible to the audience. Disney also didn't mess too much with ABC, who gives us Desperate Housewives, LOST, etc., none of which are for kids. And then, of course, there's Miramax.
Almost surely not. WDW is owned by Disney. US is owned by NBC Universal. These are two of the biggest media conglomerates in the United States, and there is no reason why they would want to, or be able to, combine any of their assets.
It's true that Disney works hard at being a good member of the community. That doesn't mean that it would go out of it's way to help US, at all.I may not have phrased it the best. To me, your post sounded like Disney is only in it for Disney. It sounded like they could care less about Universal and the rest of the tourist venues here. I was trying to say that that is not the case. They help each other and they help the community.
You may not think that Disney cares about promoting the community, but you would be wrong. Both companies have individuals who are part of community development committees. They do sit around and try to decide how to make Orlando a better tourist destination. Just recently, a famous fountain at Lake Eola in Orlando took a lightening strike. The cost to fix the system would be close to 1 million dollars. The city has insurance, but the deductible is almost $500k. The city turned to the tourist venues to help. They will be donating money to get the fountain fixed.
When I worked for Disney, the CMs had many opportunities to join community improvement projects. Disney puts a lot of effort into helping the community. Last year, I attended a promotion that raised money for local schools. It was held at the Amway Arena. Hundreds attended. The ushers and helpers for the promotion were all cast members from Universal.
I'm not saying that these companies don't look out for their own interests, but they do have a stake in the community. Orlando is actually a pretty tight community.