As I said, it is indicative of the industry. The fact is that you can say that Delta cut costs too quickly; that US Airways made structural changes to address their bankruptcy that left it without the structural infrastructure that it had in the past; that AirTran is growing too fast, etc. This is an industry issue.Look, I'm a huge fan of Jet Blue and will gladly fly them again. But Jet Blue's problems resulted from structural flaws in Jet Blue. They grew too fast - they expanded their routes without having the structural infrastructure to support it. They admit it - why defend them?
The only difference is that JetBlue is saying that there is a problem, while the other airlines are keeping their problems close to the vest.
Not even a little. When I was traveling 200+ days per year, I would be reaccommodated via an interline agreement at least twice each year.As for the interline thing - I've been a reasonably heavy flier for 20 years. I've yet to see a problem where it came into play. I know it does, but it's totally minor.
Interline agreements don't fix missed flights. It is strictly a benefit to passengers who's itineraries are disrupted by cancellations.Besides, it's just one more factor in the airline's delay statistics. If an airline averages 10 missed flights due to problems, and is able to fix one of those through interline agreements, that's still 9 missed flights.