Originally posted by cati
Can knights on white horses be very far behind?
I sure hope not!!! My DD deserves a knight.![]()
Yeah, mine too!

Originally posted by cati
Can knights on white horses be very far behind?
I sure hope not!!! My DD deserves a knight.![]()
Originally posted by N.Bailey
I understand what you're saying, but why should it only be woman who give these rights up if they're not serving? I don't believe this to be a women's lib issue. I realize you do, I don't however.
Originally posted by N.Bailey
Yeah, mine too!![]()
Originally posted by N.Bailey
You're sarcasm is so becoming! I feel all the more intelligent for having read your response here!
Originally posted by I <3 Eeyore
So if someone tried to enlist and was rejected for one reason or another they aren't entitled to equal rights? I think there's a big difference between not serving and refusing to serve. Whether or not a person served in the military has nothing to do with their ability to form an opinion on what is just.
This debate is about whether women should be required to register and serve in the event of a draft. At this point in time it is still a volunteer military and has been for some time. Pointing fingers at people who didn't enlist in the past is absurd and not germaine to the argument.
Originally posted by AirForceRocks
Apparently you don't understand what I'm saying, or you wouldn't keep misstating my position.
EVERYONE should be willing to serve their country in order to preserve their rights. Those that aren't WILLING to serve, whether they actually do serve or not obviously don't value those rights. And if they don't value them, why should they keep them?
Originally posted by AirForceRocks
I believe that everyone should raise their children as they see fit, but I've got to say, I really pity these little girls that are being raised to believe that they need a man to take care of them.
How very sad.![]()
Originally posted by Rutt and Tuke
<- since we don't have a popcorn smilie
Originally posted by Evil Princess
That's the EXACT point I'm making. I <3 Eeyore, listen up this is for you too, since you and AFR have the same brain tonight.
You keep throwing the argument that because women have the vote, becaues we have equal rights, that I am not entitled to them becaue I don't fight for them.
Can you refresh my memory as to what war women fought in to get the vote? Was it "The Women's Voting War?" Forgive me, I must've missed out on that one in history class.
I agree, women shouldn't just sit around and be helpless. Women did not gain the vote by fighting a war (well, one in combat anyway). They held protests and got their points across other ways. Would I do the same? YES, I would be willing to protest and argue for my rights. That protest that was held in DC a couple of months back about women's rights and abortion? You could bet I'd be there protesting if I was going to college nearby. That is NOT, IMHO, the same thing as going overseas and literally fighting in a war.
Originally posted by AirForceRocks
I'm sorry, but that is just silly. People that don't have children or who only have sons or those that have served in the military are the only ones that are qualified to answer the question?
What about those of us that have daughters AND sons that would be affected by this - do WE get a say in the matter?
And for the love of God, would someone, ANYONE tell me why they value their daughter's lives more than they value their son's lives? I value both of my children equally, and I think it's appalling that so many people are saying they could deal with sending a son off to war but not a daughter.
I don't NEED a man to do things for me.
Originally posted by AirForceRocks
So in other words, you're willing to risk a blister to retain your rights, but not willing to risk your life to do so. That tells me that you either a) don't value those rights very much or b) believe that it the obligation of someone ELSE to die for your rights.
Originally posted by I <3 Eeyore
I can't help you with that one. The logic kinda escapes me, too.
Originally posted by AirForceRocks
Sure you do - you need men (and willing women) to fight wars for you. You don't value your equality enough to be willing to fight for it.
Originally posted by Rutt and Tuke
I just wanted to say that I didn't respond to the Eeyore person's remark, because I don't really care if you believe me or not. I know the truth of the matter.
Hell, if I was going to lie, I could have said I served. LOL
Do we really KNOW that AFR is in the air force?![]()
Originally posted by N.Bailey
I'd be curious, do the rules that effect enlistment also apply to a draft? Would flat feet be a cause to keep you out of the draft is what I mean?
You're making it out about women's right to vote though. Maybe not you personally. I don't remember who initially brought that up. I didn't realize a draft had anything to do with ones right to vote either! If you're suggesting if I'm against a woman's draft, that I should have to give up my right to vote and other womanly pleasures and rights, then why is to irrelevant that I'd want the same from anyone who's not served? That is not the issue at hand either!
Originally posted by I <3 Eeyore
Well then, I'll certainly be mighty careful about believing what you...people might say here on the DIS. You...they might possibly lie to prove your...their point. How did I ever manage to make it to this point in life...gullible fool that I am?![]()
Originally posted by Evil Princess
No, I dont want to DIE in order to vote. Sorry if that makes me selfish, but to me breathing far outweighs my say in an election. I'd rather be living my life and having a man tell vote instead of me than be dead and not even have a chance to live my life.