CPM said:
I agree and frankly, I find it unclassy, trashy and very immature that anyone would say something like that about a child's name

.
For the record, I never used the word "trashy".
Nor did I use the word "unintelligent" which another poster extrapolated from my post.
However, there is a book called Freakonomics, which shows a statistical correlation between low-incomes and oddly-spelled names (i.e. the lower the income, the more unusual the spelling of the name.) This is not my personal claim, merely a statistical correlation.
There is no denying that words have connotations. Naming a child is a parent's first responsibility and it is a huge one. Societies' perception of your child will, in many ways, be shaped by his or her name. Like it or not, we perceive a Tiffany differently than we do a Margaret. There have been numerous sociological studies that demonstrate this.
Whether it ought to be is another debate, but the fact remains, we do make assumptions about people based on their names (and for all you who will swear up and down that you don't, yes you do. If I told you my name was Ye Bin Mok, you would not leap to the initial conclusion that I was, say, Swedish.)
Anyway, if I am skeptical of the child's name, it is a reflection on the parents, not the child. A child's name will ultimately be the property and responsibility of the child (to live up to, or to live down). It should not be the outlet for the parents to express their
own "creativity", "imagination", "uniqueness" or whatever they want to call it.
To the OP - sorry for hijacking your thread to get on my soapbox. Ariel Grace Barbara is a lovely name (in the interest of full disclosure, one of those names happens to be mine, so I am biased) and congratulations on your new arrival!