A Pixar-themed resort would be great! Different Pixar films as the theme of each floor of the resort, maybe 4 or 5 floors total. One floor would be called "Monstropolis", one would be called "Toy Story", one would be "The Deep Blue Sea", one would be based on Cars, and maybe one for The Incredibles.
In this Pixar-themed resort would be a restaurant that would serve a character breakfast and a character dinner. The breakfast would have Mike & Sulley from Monsters, Inc. and Woody the Cowboy & Buzz from Toy Story. The dinner would have superheroes from The Incredibles and Lightning McQueen & Mater from Cars, although those would be tough going table to table, maybe the Cars characters would just have to be in the lobby for photos. I don't know how they would incorporate the fish from Finding Nemo but it is Disney and I am sure they would find a way. These characters could also be at the dinner.
I agree with youmy kids would love that
Something like Nickelodeon has right now I have heard people loved it I have never been always staying on Disney property
The pool could be themed like the sea in Finding Nemo. The quick-service restaurant could have themed menu items like "Shark's bite fish sandwich" or something like that. There could also perhaps be a signature restaurant, or even a Dinner Show based on the Pixar films, getting the audience involved as well.
Maybe this would all be too cheesy for a DVC resort, I don't know. I know they have All-Star Movies as a Value resort already but I still think this Pixar idea for a DVC resort would be cute!
What I think would be fun is the idea for a wine country type resort. Think CA napa valley idea. That would be gorgeous and who knows, maybe they could have a vineyard somewhere and bottle an exclusive wine that is featured there. lol and I don't even drink wine.
DVSea
Got two really big boats on their way??
I'd love to see a sleek art deco resort.
I think they will do the opposite and try a value dvc, possibly at Pop Century as it has the unfinished section that just seemed to have stopped for unknown reasons when everything else around it continued to complete. Pop would be the ideal location with the vast majority of the infrasructure already in place. My guess is that the "value" option at the AKL is the test for a value DVC resort. Then again I could be completely wrong...
OMG was that unexpected and hilarious! I laughed out loud!!!You know, it may not be that far fetched! I hear Holly, Bridget and Kendra are looking for a new home?
![]()
![]()
To answer the OP's question, I think they could do a cool place around the 7 ancient wonders of the world. I also think a princess resort would be cool, too! Kind of combines a bunch of things around current resorts and the parks, but I would definitely stay at a pricess resort!![]()
A french village ala Beauty and the Beast .
I would definitely like to see that too. I would have preferred it over BLT, personally.
Do most people agree that Disney is probably more likely to add DVC resorts to already existant resorts rather than building all new ones? (Specifically in Florida)
This is an very interesting idea, however how would it be done?
Would points cost the same and just stretch further? Or would the fact that it is next to a value resort make the point cost lower? If the point cost was lower how would that work if the owner wanted to stay at BCV or BLT, or trade in to RCI?
If they were the same price what would make the decision to buy there vs AKV, which has some value rooms avail?
Yes but the minimum buy in would be reduced from 160 to 100 or whatever the average weekly point costs were for a 1 brv.Would points cost the same and just stretch further?
I would keep it the same cost as noted above but would keep it as part of Pop (like BC is to YC, BW is to BWV, WL is WLV, etc). I would keep the point cost the same with less points required per day to stay per categories available which is where the "value" would be seen.Or would the fact that it is next to a value resort make the point cost lower?
For that and other reasons I would keep the point cost the same. Pop owners of a 100 pt contract would need to bank or borrow in order to book a weeks stay at a deluxe resort based on the 100 point buy in (again, totally hypothetic).If the point cost was lower how would that work if the owner wanted to stay at BCV or BLT, or trade in to RCI?
The same reasons used today by people to determine where they want to buy today such as the resorts appeal, resort location, buying where you want to stay, 11/7 rule (or maybe even an 11/6 rule for value home resort owners), etc.If they were the same price what would make the decision to buy there vs AKV, which has some value rooms avail?