tvguy
Question anything the facts don't support.
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2003
- Messages
- 47,495
At least here the school lunch programs try to be healthy, after all Sacramento has started branding itself as the "Farm to Fork Capital"........but there are lots of strings attached to the Federal money for school lunches. You HAVE to use approved suppliers. So what is happening here is, we have Foster Farms just down the highway who can provide fresh, preservative free chicken for the schools, but they aren't an approved supplier. So they have to buy Tyson frozen and preservative laden chicken nuggets trucked in from Arkansas because Tyson is an approved supplier. And yes, Tyson is a huge political donor without regard to the party the recipient is affiliated with.This makes sense. Sadly, it is at the expense of the quality of food served. I've looked at the ingredients of the food our school serves. Tasting bad is the least of the worries. The preservatives and additives are horrible. We have moved to eating a whole food, mostly unprocessed diet at home and it makes a world of difference as far as health. I feel lucky we have the means to do that. I know many students rely on schools to eat that is why more focus should be put on providing unprocessed meals (like another poster said, chicken breast and a fruit or veggie is a good one and add rice to that for an acceptable carb). Serving a donut and juice at breakfast is setting a kid up to fail. Eggs and bacon or sausage and whole fruit for breakfast would improve focus and behavior issues.
https://www.abc10.com/article/enter...bell/103-15c477b3-7b7b-4e4d-82b6-820e99a38925