KAT4DISNEY
Glad to be a test subject
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2008
- Messages
- 28,410
Exactly, which benefits Disney, not the owner trying to sell or the buyer trying to buy. Those that buy RIV could have a difficult time selling it down the road (still too early to tell). So, Disney has no real motive for ever lifting the restrictions. Let's just say the bottom falls out of the market for RIV...owners may hold on to them, then letting them go at a huge loss. My gut is that Disney is banking on people who buy and have to sell down the road will have a more difficult time because of the restrictions and thus, drive people to buy from Disney direct so they get the trading power into other resorts that makes the DVC product so good.
DVC would have but in the out clause because what they might feel they are seeing are sluggish sales because the restriction is there. The lifitng would happen while it was still in active sales. Once Riviera is sold out? The only incentive might be is if this did end up causing booking issues down the road for direct owners because resale buyers were very diligent in booking or they have no other options. That might trickle down as news to new the next resort sales and impede DVC selling them. And be an incentive for them to lift the restrictions. Otherwise for the most part if they don't think they're seeing an effect on their direct sales then it won't be changed after the resort is sold out. Thus my guess that if say Reflections was sluggish they and the felt they could get better take rate if they didn't have the restrictions I doubt they'd leave Riviera sitting there as the only resort with those types of restrictions.