Thats not how grandfathering works or why it happens.
When you say things like this, it just underscores my point that you don’t seem to understand the POS, the nature of protections we are afforded therein (in this instance, what is not at all protected), or why Disney does not have carte blanche to do all of the things you keep insisting they do.
All of which would be fine; most owners have never even seen the POS to the timeshare they own; the problem is you swing the “attorney” thing around, claiming to have pored over the POS, while saying nonsense like how owners are grandfathered member benefits because somehow we have “rights” protected by some contract, and stating wrong information from a place of authority. And you get comments like this:
All of this at the cost of degrading the concept of ownership rights by perpetuating the false narrative that unless proven by virtue of a lawsuit, Disney is acting within its rights based on your professional reading, which you repeatedly prove to be questionable at best.
To their credit, Disney has been responsive when members have raised concerns around questionable policy positions. If you’re going to undermine that, at least put in the effort to understand terms of our agreement.
You don’t seem to understand the difference between the Condo Association and the sales contract.