I'd have to agree... My family loves VB...
True.. The land and land is the most expensive, but alot of that is offsite in the higher dues that they collect from members.
It's also true that expansion across the road was cancelled and land was sold, but IMHO, the resort is better off because of it... It makes it smaller and more intimate...
As far as
DVC unloading the property, DVC cannot sell our interests... Maybe one day, VB might be managed by Hilton or more than likely Marriot as DVC has worked with them in the past, but we'd still have the right to stay there.. What we would lose is the ability to use points to stay at the WDW resorts without going through II, but then maybe we'd gain the option to use whatever resorts the new management company has.. Personally, I own at both VB and BWV, so I know that I more than likely will always have the option of staying on WDW property. Plus I wonder that if DVC does ever sell the management over to another company, if our contracts would still end at 2042??
That being said, I tend to think that DVC will keep the property... With SSR and EP in the works, the number of members will be going up and up, and booking VB will become harder and harder. The VB property rounds out the collection quite nicely for members. It makes the overall values of our memberships more.