The Black Panthers committed to a violent image and to actual violence from their inception.
For example, one author writing in 1976, observed that the group's "paramilitarism was clearly visible from the start, as Black Panthers strutted around in their black jackets, black berets, and tight-fitting black pants, their pockets bulging with side arms, their clenched fists high above their defiant heads (Albert Parry,
Terrorism from Robespierre to Arafat).
The group acted on its image. In some instances, members would appear en masse and simply threaten violence.
In others, they took over buildings or engaged in shootouts with police or with other militant groups. Both Black Panther members and police members were killed in confrontations.
- 1967-1968: A number of shootouts between Black Panther members and the police, leave a number of both parties dead
- April 6, 1968: An armed confrontation between Black Panthers and police led to a 90 minute confrontation at a building housing Panthers. Eventually, the Panthers surrendered. Over the course of the day, at least four policemen were wounded and one killed. One Panther member, Bobby Hutton, was killed by the police and seven others were arrested.
I didn't look hard, but those popped up. I don't think you could call the Panthers small potatoes, but the Klan sure has been around longer. I will add that the Klan is pretty much underground these days while there is a New Black Panther group that has way worse ideology than the original group ever did. Read their manifesto, it's chilling. At least the original group evolved over time and then went away. The new one is