Eye opening discussion - Thank you. I'm torn about some issues, but certainly not all.
While my dd lurves her some PB&J, that most definitely does not outweigh another child's right to basic safety. We'd find alternatives, no question, complete no-brainer. I might gripe/groan to myself about it initially (when faced with the 'oh crud, what do I pack now? dilemma'), but I'm sure with time it'd become a complete non-issue.
But . . . where does/will the line fall? I am (thankfully only peripherally, as we don't have any allergies in our family) aware that food allergies are on the rise - in terms of numbers, types, and severity. I truly feel for y'all that have to scrutinize every single label of every single item for nuts, wheat, dairy, etc. I can easily find alternatives to nuts - but wheat (also airborne)? That's far more difficult (as I know those of y'all faced with it know) . . ..
Part of me says that if it comes to that, then the schools need to be charged with coming up with/offering several acceptable options (as it would be the only way to assure that these omnipresent allergens don't show up) - but, let's face it, our schools are having a hard enough time just educating our children (that's a whole other conversation!). {side note: I don't mean that in any way to offend our educators on here - y'all are charged with an enormous task, yet given far too little money/support/time to accomplish it, IMO!}
I certainly don't claim to know the answer(s) . . ..